
Content Moderation, Encryption, and the Law
About this episode
One of the most urgent debates in tech policy at the moment concerns encrypted communications. At issue in proposed legislation, such as the UK’s Online Safety Bill or the EARN It Act put forward in the US Senate, is whether such laws break the privacy promise of end to end encryption by requiring content moderation mechanisms like client-side scanning. But to what extent are such moderation techniques legal under existing laws that limit the monitoring and interception of communications?
Today’s guest is James Grimmelmann, a legal scholar with a computer science background who recently conducted a review of various moderation technologies to determine how they might hold up in under US federal communication privacy regimes including the Wiretap Act, the Stored Communications Act, and the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The conversation touches on how technologies like server side and client side scanning work, the extent to which the law may fail to accommodate or even contemplate such technologies, and where the encryption debate is headed as these technologies advance.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Tech Policy Press Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Tech Policy Press Podcast

AI, Gig Work, and the Future of Nursing
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Unpacking the SECURE Data Act
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Attorney General Raúl Torrez on What's Next in New Mexico's Case Against Meta
The Tech Policy Press Podcast

Why Palantir's ImmigrationOS Endangers Democracy and the Rule of Law
The Tech Policy Press Podcast