Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
societyJan 29, 20259:39pending

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

About this episode

The text presents the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The case centered on the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act’s (BCRA) restrictions on corporate independent expenditures in political campaigns. The Court overturned key precedents, holding that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as individuals regarding political spending. While affirming BCRA’s disclaimer and disclosure requirements, the ruling significantly altered campaign finance law by removing limits on corporate independent expenditures. Dissenting opinions argued the decision disregarded important precedents, lacked sufficient evidence, and jeopardized the integrity of elections.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Think and Act Locally publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Think and Act Locally

0:00
9:39

More episodes

More from Think and Act Locally

View all episodes →