Chulin 118

0:00Kufdü, Drakhas, or Madalif, on the first wide line, it's not awesome, bring a Mischdorf from being a Vooksen. I boxed off it with two lines and it's dealing with Yad and Shamer. Essentially, a Yad is if you have a widget and there's something connected to the widget, like a handle, a little bit of Yad be a handle. It's sort of part of the frying pan, but it's not part of the frying pan. Like you're going to fry the eggs in the frying pan part, but you need to handle. Otherwise, it's not function, that's a Yad as Shamer. It's let's say like a piece of skin from the animal that has the meat attached to the animal that it protects the piece of skin, but it's not really the piece of meat. So Kulshu, who if you had something and I had to line these forwards, Yad, the loy, Shamer. It functions in Yad, but does not function as a Shamer. Well, Tame, who mit Tame. So if it, let's say, was tarant, touches a sharrant, it would become and transfer the

1:01tumour. Let's say it was a piece of skin with the meat attached to it to transfer it to the meat, even though the skin itself, let's say like a sheep skin, is not really that food at all. It would be macabre tumour like the food itself. So, a mit Tame, it would, then if it was time we would be able to transfer the tumour, so something else touched the Yad and did not touch the thing itself, it would transfer the tumour to it. The enumid star if it would not join, in other words, if the food item had a shear less than a bait set would not increase the size to get you to a minimum size of a bait set. Kama. And on here, Shamer, about to be Shano Yad, let's say it's functioning as a Shamer but even though it's not a Yad, that would be like the skin of, let's say, a sheep connected to some of the meats. That would be Tame, umitame, like we said before, an enumid star if it would join together

2:05with the shear of the meat of the muscle, I guess, that is meat to get it to the minimum size. Kama, let's say something that's low Yad, the low Y Shamer. Not Yad, not a Shamer, for instance, so let's say like, hair. You know, you don't pick something up by one hair of it. You don't, so it doesn't protect it. Low tummy, the low Yad mid tummy. So if something next tummy touches the hair, it wouldn't make the meat attached to it. Tame. Similarly, if the beet was talking in the hair, it's not the yellow, so we'd bad give off its tumour. That's the end of this next source. Yad, guys, they put a fire box on Yad, guys. Hey, Kaksivis, what's the scriptural source of this concept of a Yad? Well, now we're going to have here three psocs that are quoted. They're all from Veikwa, chapter 11, and it's going to be dealing with seeds. It's going to be dealing with a animal that died. It's going to be dealing with a ton or a oven. So the first psoc, Dixi, the psoc says, is psoc lameth ches over there, and this is

3:08by seeds. It says, we're chiyutan mayim alzera, but not many of us am alav tamihul lachha. So when water also liquid is put on seeds or anything that grew, and then a dead herb is going to say an animal that's tummy fell on it, it would be tamihul lachhaem, that term lachhaem we're going to do as a whole ship is sirekhhaem, for like any part of that which you would need it for, and I don't want to do any of these words, the raw voice of sirekhhaem. This comes to include not only the food item itself, but also a yad, kama, uksi, and then the next psoc, psoc lameth ches, that is by an evela, it says, we chiyutan must be in a behemer as you lachhaem animal and all the other types of dead, that's yours in the veilah. Lachhaem, for you all, that is lachhaem sirekhhaem. So what's that coming to include? Well that would be lirabu says, hayyadu says, that underline lirabu says, hayyadu is apparently of two phrases to include yadu says, being shaykh to the tumah, colon and therefore

4:16yad lachhaem s ulohi c. So we have the idea that yad would function to bring tumah into the item itself and also if the item itself was coming to bring the tumah out. What about though, kama, shumalah, this lohi c connector, lulzara, krah. As far as the shumalah, let's say like the peel of something, to bring tumah to it or to take tumah away from it, you don't even need a pusse, because this evela, kama, lulzara and from what we just saw, hayyadu says, colon, myyad, shaykhna magina, a handle does really protect the item itself. Yet, machinesis u moitsia, it functions as the ability to bring in and to take out tumah from it and shaykhna, like cultured, shaykhna, shaykhna, is actually protecting the item all the more soot, it's more shaykhna is to the item. Which case, shaykhna is a strong monolomaliy, why do you have to tell me about shaykhna, like a shaykhna, you can know from a couple of times, shaykhna magina, let's say that would come to tell you that additional item or that additional halalah, that if the food item in question had less than a necessary sheer, you could join together along with it

5:19the sheer of the shaykhna. Period. What was going to question the presentation, which is a few times, three times, for aim I put a diamond around vehima and a number one in the margin with a diamond, two lines later at the end of the line, there's another vehima, that gets a diamond with a number two in the margin, the diamond around the number two. And when I flip the page, the first line, first word, another base is vehima, that gets a diamond with a number of three in the margin. So three times of the margin, that's why not say, and then make a suggestion a little bit different. So here we go. Vehima, why not say? Now we were learning yad and we were learning shaykhma from those verses. So yad here I circled and the first word on the next line, shaykhma or I also circled. So I only say like this, that what do we learn from all those phrases? Yad lahathnis, not Lahathsi. Why don't we say the yad, it could bring the tumah in but not let the tumah out. Shaykhma which we had circled, Lahathnis or Lahathsi, but a shaykhma would bring them

6:19either way. Aval, here would be the difference with this suggested approach. Not Lahathsi, that you would have a yad that would function to take the tumah away from the item and transfer it to something else. Also that a shaykhma is the tsar-aif that a shaykhma would join together to make it the minimum required cheer. Maybe low we don't say that. Well the more answers, that's not a valid approach because the yad lahathnis below the hoaxi, oh much the summer is here, you can't really say that the yad is going to function to bring tumah in but not let it out. Why? Actually Yulimayla, it actually brings it into something that didn't have tumah at all then if it's already the thing tumah, afukim, bi-lakh of course it would spread it to something else. Second attempt to ask a question on the approach for aima, yad, I circled the word yad four lines later, I circled the word shaykhma. So why not say this, fine. Yad, the other way, Lahathsi, Lahathnis, if the item itself is tumah already then it will make the yad function to transfer that tumah into something else but not the tumah.

7:23That's a big advantage. And a shaykhma, which is a certain shaykhma, Lahasi Lahathnis, aval and here's what we wouldn't know, this would be the difference, yad lahathnis. How do you know that the thing function just because it said yad that it would make the item itself tumah, those ones that tumah before and a shaykhma that's still the same low. Well and he would be in the third person. Now this is back to Vayikra, parikud alif, I believe this is Puss of Lamaid hay if he keeps it from earlier and this is by a tonor, by the old time other than he used to have. Xeev it says, tonor vikirayib, utas, utas, adikirayib which is placed to put a pot onto, I have to be smashed or it's rather more becomes tumah and then the adds the word at the end of the pot, lahem, just like I did the previous few times in which case we'll darsen it, lahem lahosha vitsar khaykhma, any part of it, Laharab is to include yad deis. Okay, now the assumption here is that at least one of those terms was extra.

8:24The thing is though which one was actually at, we need all of them suggesting raheminayu meyatere. So as she says, you need all of them to teach that it would take the tumah out and we'll go reach one now, lithaiv put a vector underneath the word lithaiv so it's directly below one line another lithaiv and directly below that another lithaiv. So there's three mid-curus that we brought, one by zrayim, one by tonor, one by naveila. So lithaiv raheminayu mana zrayim, we want to just tell us that there is a yad dei hithsar by zrayim seeds, the leh suhan of meyatere, we want to learn the other two from it. Well, can't do that because mana zrayim shakain tumahs maruba. You can't do that because the amount of cases of tumah when it comes to zrayim is like a lot because zrayim can become tumah even from a vlana tumah. As opposed to let's say a tonor which will become tumah from my higher, more intense level abatumah.

9:26Okay, lithaiv rahemana so then let the puzzle come for it in just by tonor. The lithaiv meyatere, and I would learn the other two from it. Well, no, mala tonor, you can't do that because the tonor if that was going to be the source, shakain mitan mavi, right? Tonor is like really bizarre, like kind of dangle the dead sherets in its airspace and suddenly everything inside it becomes tonor. That's right. Okay, fine with that. But this lithaiv meyatere, the word lithaiv rahemana, let the puzzle come for it in by naveila that there is such a thing as tumah lahid sa, um, the leh suhan of meyatere, and learn the other two. Zrayim and tonor from it. Malinavale, you can't have naveila's this or shakain mitan ma, adum umetan ma masa. The tumah is meyatere, it's got also something very unique. And number one, it can translate just tumah to a person. Number two, even just by burdening it, like carrying it, even though you're not touching it, um, it would translate tumah. And also the tumah is like intrinsically from the naveila. Okay, so you couldn't teach, I just couldn't have the possibility to just one,

10:27learn the other two from it. Khademi khadu lahid sa, how about this though? Tasi khademi tarti, one I have the possibility to just by two of the three, and I would learn the third from it. Okay, so the more that's speaking out and see if that's the possibility, hey, Tasi, which one of the three would be the one you would derive from the other two? So how about this? Now the gnomarsmen over each possibility of if it didn't write this, so low lift, if I double on nine in the word low. Four lines later, the fourth, the last word is low, I double on nine. That the line below is after the lalif, another low, I double on nine. So three suggestions, long lift of one of the three, let the possibility of when it comes to the seeds, for Tasi khadu lahid, and let me learn it from a combination of Tana and naveila. Well, no, Mahlaha naveila can't learn from that, because Shakin, Mitam and Shalobahakshar, they received their tumah, even if it was no Haksha, or Tana, no, it's not going to be Makshha or Tana, and Dengal Sharats, and it's tumming naveila. And actually, like intrinsically, it's tumming.

11:28Tali mark, the same piece it by Zoroy, when it comes to seeds, Shai, Mitam and Lalifahakshar. They don't become tumm-if, like you just have a seed or a fruit, it's detached from the source of its growth. It doesn't become tumm-if, and it's actually have like a Haksha, which in this context means like desired contact with a liquid after it been picked. Okay, Narafuna jumps in and says, well, that's not really a valid point, Amarifuna, greater be sure. Peirai shalai hukshur, no, no, if you're talking about Zoroy or Peirai shalai, that if not even Makshha, basically not done. And therefore, they would then be tansm-if, almost like a tonnish-ling naveila. If you have a tonnish-ling naveila, that has yet to be finished being made, it also won't be tumm-if. Ella, rather, I squint one on the a- Ella, Paragachu, you would have to make the question like this, colon, slightly different. Malahana, you couldn't use Tana and naveila, and then learns from it why Shikane Nitam in Shalai Bina Gia.

12:31They become Tame, like even without touching, the thing that was Tame. We know the tonnish-ling naveila is like inherently Tame, Tame, Mark on the same beside Bayes Royam, Shane Nitam in Ella Bina Gia, I'm reading it the way Russia is the gyrus, and the way the gyrus is the student, and that it becomes Tame, only if something actually physically came into contact with it. Okay, so that's not a good suggestion. How about this? Loyal if they leave double-in-the-word low, let the puzzle go not a written bit Tana, but taste of Hanna, learn from Naveil and Zrayam? Well, no, you can't do that, because Malahana, Shikane, no you can't. Maybe Naveil and Zrayam have this halacha, because there are things that would be eaten, the written animal, if it was kosher would be eaten, Zrayam could be eaten, you can't say the same by a Tana, okay, well, how about this? Loyal if they buy double-in-the-word low, let the puzzle never written by Naveil of a Tacy, may Hanna, and learn from a combination of Zrayam, seeds, or these are growing the ground, fruits, etc., or Tana, or and learn Naveil from it?

13:34Hmm, the actually could do that. In which case then, we go back to the drawing board, because the original fush of God, the Naveil of Lomily, why do you have to have the puzzle tell specifically that there's God by Naveil? Like, you would know that from the combination of Zrayam and Tana. Even in Liyabana, well, you don't need it to tell us that, and therefore it's not to teach us the Adlobilats in the Naveiliyad Dama. In general, that there's a concept of Yad, like a frying pan, oh, colon, in which case, Yad lahakness, I don't know, Yad lahakness in the Adloheitsi, and a shameless Zrayaf, that is a general rule that would apply. Vacati, but still has the Gimara, Yad Naveil, it's Rick, you still need Yad Naveil, don't know me already, you're doing the Yad Naveil, why? Because Rakhman had been Naveilah, if it would not have written it, the Lokas Rakhman Naveilah, haven't even know what I thought to say, Diyo, let Ba min Hadin liyayis kani do it, that the Limud is only going to go so far, literally, that it's enough that the issue,

14:35which I mean, derived, be only as strong as the issue, which is derived from colon. Mahana, when you're talking about this, Zrayam, and that Tana, Loymeta Meyadah, it's not the strong of tumor that a person becomes telling me from it, you might have thought to say, Af Naveilah, Lomid Tana Meyadah, and maybe Naveilah, also Naveil Tana Meyadah, oh, in which case, unless we learn the other Yad Naveilah, Mitzach Zarech, Yagadah, then in which case, we don't have the Muckar, but we do because, here's another thing that is actually unnecessary, Shamer, Denaveilah, who do I sorry? We're not on the island anymore, we're going to go into a Shamer, the Shomer of Naveilah, that's what's not necessary. Now, with Tana, why did the Pusser, write it, Lomid Hiltus Akhasa Rahmanah, oh, well, in this Rufi, it's going to tell you that it would join together, the Shamer along with the Iker item, to get you to the Minum Shir, Amrus, Loymeta Zarech, we did say, like on Kufi Zainab Bayes right at the bottom, that it would be Mitzach, it would be Lohit Sea, and as far as if it's coming to make,

15:38able to transfer to them, so so much that there's a Shamer, they'd become Tamae, or it would become Tamae, well, Kabutan Meyadah, say we would know that, like, certainly from the Yad, in which case, Ella, I suppose we'll learn in the Ella, in the Shamer, did Naveilah, didn't need it for that, say, Wynnimli, Yad, did Naveilah, something else in the Naveilah, which is the Yad, do you mean Wynnimli, in the Yad, in the Vela, which we don't need, say, Wynnimli, Yad, general, Yad, colon, and therefore, Yad, Lohit Sea, if they item itself this, Tamae, the Yad would transfer to them into something else. Yad, Lohit, they say, Dut, underline, the Shamer, Litsari, when it comes, let's say, to Tuma, so I think we have to have it in the Shamer. Says if we're one more attempt, though, the Ema, we'll put a Dime Dron, the same, you may know, when the Shamer did Naveilah, which is what we'd just suggest before, you don't need it, tell you about Shamer, let's say, when the Shamer, Dama, like in general, for Evelin, Shamer Lohaknes, Shamer Litsari, of a Yad,

16:38Lohaknes, like, question mark, like, why not say, the wouldn't have the ability to take, let's say, if someone was Tome, and it touched the Yad, then it would make the thing Tome, maybe not. Hell, Lohaknes, Shamer Lohaknes, and the Allah, it's almost like back to the drawing, Lord. Meekar Kiksivah Yad, when the Puzzle originally mentioned this concept, Yad, Ahaknesok Sivah was actually written in the context of, Ahaknesok, in other words, let's see the Rashi on the fourth line, Lohaknes, Shamer Lohaknes, Shamer Lohaknes, Kaloimar, Shamer Lohaknes, let's see the Rashi inside, Hades, Me Rashi, that which we had asked from the earlier part, Aima Yad, Baha'i Sivah Lohaknes, maybe the whole Yad, mentioning this only to bring the Tome, but excuse me, to take the Tome once it's time itself, to take it out, but not to bring it in. Well, we can't really say that, La Pyrchee, why, the Kiksivah Yad, the context with which Yad was written in the Puzzle, but Eichlin, at Kilos, Tumasan, Ksifa, that's what it's like, firstly coming Tome,

17:39Shamer Khablin, or something, or Sheritz, the Kavende Machnesse, if it can become Tome, Koshri and Shamer Ksifa, what's it, it's Tome, certainly, it could have its Tumas bread via the Yad, in which case for Shamer Lohaknes, he may come from Rashi, and Shamer Desrayim, let's sorry, that is the Gamora's approach. On the fourth line, we pick up, and Shamer Ksifa didn't avail, anomaly, well, that way, Shamer Ksifa, we need a Lugufa. Okay, we need it to teach us the acronym, that there's an avail, and there would be a Shamer, and there would be a Tumas transfer between the meat of the Nevela, and something, colon, ulemi, okay, feel a Gufa, which didn't specifically, I squiggle on the word E, E leads through Fee, Amazon mid-star-rif, again, we said, it wouldn't be mid-starves to make it the minimum share. E, I squiggle on the word E La Hachnes, if it's to transfer to me, in or out, Kavikhan Mijana,

18:39they call them more so if a Yad is functioning to do that, certainly the Shamer would. So, Lugufa has an answer. Milsa, sometime, something that asks about Kavikhan Mijana, even though it's something that you can learn with Kavikhan Mijana, everything you need to tell you, still for various reasons, Taro, Kavikhan Mijana, Kavikhan Mijana, anyway, we'll tell you that, then, we'll one second, then, if it's a Pazikhan Mijana, tell you that, then, like, anyway, even though you could learn from Kavikhan Mijana, Kavikhan Mijana, Shamer, Da-Alma, E-Malachwanis, but regular case of a Shamer, Lahaknes, Mijana, Sardas, Kavikhan Mijana, Taro, Kasselokra, Swannis, Sardas, Sardas, and, well, Borg-N-Alach, it also be the case, because even though you could learn from Kavikhan Mijana, you would read it anyway. And it bars two answers, either, answer number one, heikhan Mijana, just our shin-un, listen, when you have the ability to darsen it, so you do darsen it. Second answer, if you could, you know, Amar, Shini Shamer, you'd endavaila. That's different. When you do the withinavaila, it's an animal that died in the Shomer of it. Kavendamise Yad, Kha, of it, since it's basically functionals of Yad, to have it come in around,

19:40like you would pick up that piece of debaela, using the skin, Yad Shadinan lay. We basically make it just like the Yad. Herr-Rashi says, this is about 60% of the way down the derollines of the Rashi, do we're more like Yad Shadinan lay. Li-Ois, In-N-Liyad Damat, a general that Yad is a reality, and hashtakulud Shrekh in there for, according to this, you need all of the mentions of it in the Psoke, Kolyada Saksibi, Lahoytze, Shrekhi, Dachadameida Khlai Asya, Kedermini, you can't learn one, from the other Uddenevaila, that Yad mentioned in the Conzun Naveila, we should like to have read Dayao, not to say that, and the Shomer of Yad Nasa, Li-Ois, In-N-Liyad Da-Hach Nasa, the Shomer of Da-Echlin, Litsa Raith, so back in the Kamara, Mas-Kazar-Ryu-Dabay-I-Sh-Maw, Hadith-Than, what do you do then with this? I guess it's a mischievous from, Uksid, if you have a Pomegranate, the Pomegranate is attached to the tree,

20:41and then the other side has this little crown thing, and in the crown thing, these little growths that look flourly grow, so how pit-bush-y'll-re my Mr. Reff, is fan-netch-y-le-ain-myth-star. The pit-bush-y'll-re, which is a little, it's a little, like, growth inside of the crown thing, we'll join together again, a shear, but not the little crown thing around the top. Ask the Kamara, va-a-my, well, why should I need a mischievous? Right, but with a mischievous, I need a mischievous, not like the item itself. Well, Cree-Con, because you should, again, this is still the question, va-a-my, Cree-Con, shouldn't you apply over here, I'll call, Zer-A-Zaru-A-Vel-Eka, it's basically something that's edible, not so unedible. This suit would even further. Hadith's not really have a mission of, I look quite familiar, I'm parked off, I put right angles in, the next line in two words. Now, this is talking about how- or, this is if I'm parked, this is the first mischievous, remember, how- or, as we learn in the word, or, which by the way, we know, or skin on the animal, the dead animal, which is, kind of, just a meat, is actually a shame here.

21:42So, how- or if I write to the keepet, so that, they'd start to let's all make two mus, Eichlin, that tin, Manila, where we know that from. LX-Lossa, Cree-CV-3, phrases, plus this, I'll call, Zera, Zaru-A, or, or, or, or Zaria? What do we need the three terms for? Colin, Khan, Lysheimer, and Dizrain, I'm not only Dizera, but the show, where this rhyme is included, Khan Lyshemer, D'Lones, a shame, where, Treething, and Edel, what's the third one for, Lysheimer, Bussar, Ubeitsim, Vedogim. That one comes to me, the eggs, or fish, that the shame, where the, let's say, the skin would be, able to sometimes transfer or out, period. I'm rev- Kiyabarashiyama-Rav, I start with Rav, and at the end of the line, his Rebi-O-Khenniser, his Rebi-O-Khenniser, he says, he says, he says, he says, the tumma of the in-yad lah-hashere, this comes to me, Yad, again, like a handle of some of this attaches, not to think itself, it's attached to it, there is, as far as tumma is concerned, like, to make tumma come into the thing,

22:42to make tumma come out of the thing, however, let, Haksher, remember, any, thing that grew in the ground, like, plants, vegetables, has to, after it is picked, come into contact in a desirable way, with liquids, or one of the main liquids, how but if the liquid touched the yad, is that like the thing itself is now moxion or not, well, according to Rav, no, where is Rebi-O-Khenniser, Haldumar, nope, Yashad, the tumma, and the Haksher, which means, Yad will function, to make it tumma into transfers to the mountain, also, even if the yad is that, which had been connected with the liquid, it would be moxionate. Now, by going through the, what is the essential point of my clothes, is in Rav, then Rebi-O-Khenniser, it's for Rebi-O-Khenniser, you can say the one, cool, ebi-O-Khenniser, you can say it's based in the, verse, I believe this is, parake, yud alif, in Vayu-Khenniser, Puss of Lama-Khest, the Puss of the Nostalisense, Vikyuton Maim al-Zerah, when water is placed on the seeds, on the grue, and now the tash, then nuffel, you've lost some love,

23:42and like one of those pre-bureaucol-e-shared things falls on it, Tami-Lachem, it'll be Tami-Lachem, Mar, suffer a devil on the word Mar, and what about that Rav? One like later, I double on the word Mar, and what about Rebi-O-Khenniser, and here are the two opinions. Rav suffer, Micra-Nidris, Lephan-Evil-O-Difine, Lephan-Evil-O-Difine, you look at a Puss of, you can d'artion from the Lachem term, and we learned Yoddys from Lachem to the phrase right before, which is Tami-Hoo, but you can't go all the way back to the beginning of the Puss of, which is talking about, Hesher. Mar, suffer a devil on the word Mar, and what about Rebi-O-Khenniser, here are the first Mar, and here at the end of the line is another Mar, that's going to be Rob. So Mar, suffer a Hesher, Tkri-Las-Tumah,

24:43who only makes sense that Hesher would work, because what is Hesher now? Hesher doesn't make the thing Tami, but basically gives something that wasn't, that didn't have the ability to become Tami, he has become Tami, so it's basically like, the first step of becoming Tami, whereas Mar, suffer a, that would be Rob is of the opinion, Hesher, what are you talking about? What's Las-Tumah, you've got some of this Maksher, and it becomes Tami, at the beginning of Tumah, you might need it for Tami, but it's not being in Tumah. Listen, who the sure, with the following three line Brysa, Tami with Brysa, Kavase, that would be just like the way we explain it, but you'll find out, the box that off it starts here. Kashem-Shieh Shad-Tumah-Kah, Yeh Shad-Leh, Hesher just has an idea of Yad function for an item, to make Tumah-Kah, maybe in the item, rather the item. So, too, there's Yad for Hesher, who Kashem-Shieh, Mekab-Lantumah, Ella-Las-Kesha, you've got this shoe, just like it's not going to come Tami, unless it's been detached from the ground, Ka-Kahem-Kah-Mahed Hesher, so two of it, want to be Masha, let's say a typical Masha with the, having a couple of times with liquid, it only works all that on sheet,

25:44which would have to be, picked if it wasn't, picked through, detached from its source of roots, uh, in the ground, it would not work, that's going to be the, Tami-Exource OddCon.