
Can We Please Be Done With Conservative Boss Babes? [Reformation Red Pill]
About this episode
CLUB MEMBERSHIP: https://reformationredpill.com/products/reformation-red-pill-club-membership
Email: [email protected] - In this episode, Joshua Haymes exposes how the conservative movement is filled and led by ideologies of feminism.
-
Our Wonderful Sponsors:
-Paleo Valley: Head to www.paleovalley.com/reformationredpill (https://paleovalley.com/promos/reformation-multi-product-page?utm_source=podcast&utm_campaign=reformation) for 15% off your first purchase.
- Montana Coffee Co. https://www.montanacoffeecompany.online/standforsomething?utm_source=rrp&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=youtube&utm_id=RRP+Partnership Code: reformation
-
Get your Christian Nationalism pin here: https://reformationredpill.com/products/christian-nationalism-flag-pin?variant=47896671518910
Get every episode summarized
Each time Fight Laugh Feast USA publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
816 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Fight Laugh Feast USA — Can We Please Be Done With Conservative Boss Babes? [Reformation Red Pill]. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
The conservative movement is shot through with feminism and we gotta be done with it. They are going into the workforce. They're not committing themselves to full-time motherhood. They are dressing like second or third-wave feminists. That is not an equivalent arrangement. If men are going to do their masculine duties, the expectation must be from a societal standpoint that women are going to perform their feminine duties, that they will lean into their role as a homemaker, as a keeper of the home, Titus II V. That should be the expectation, but it's not right now. It just isn't. What are these women actually like? Do they understand and believe and put into practice the biblical mandate to submit to their own husbands and to obey them? You can tell a lot about a woman from her Instagram profile. If she is showing off her cleavage on Instagram, you can bet that she's not a very submissive, obedient wife. My main question is why? He told me to proclaim to go using the darkness on a we must make America the Christian again.
Can we please just be done with conservative boss-babism? Please, please, the conservative movement right now is full to the brim. With women who want to defend the policies of first-wave feminism, while pursuing the career in lifestyle of second-wave feminism, while dressing with all the sexual promiscuity of third-wave feminism. In other words, the conservative movement is shot through with feminism and we've got to be done with it. We've got to be done with it. Today, I'm going to be reacting to and responding to a conversation on this very topic between Andrew Wilson and Pearl Davis. Let's pull this up here. I don't know. I haven't watched the full clip, so I don't know what I'm going to agree with or disagree with. But come on, come on, the journey with me. Let's do it. How is I'm debating Tommy Lauren? Well, she's insufferable. And she's also very deep voice on Tommy Lauren, very masculine traits on her. But also, like many of these conservative commentators, I really don't understand the female conservative commentator's fear because they're really, really stupid.
And I'm like, how is it that you keep getting brought on TV and then you realize, oh, I see, it's because they think that men want to have sex with you. And so they present you as a package where you say, right wing thing plus man want and then bam, we make money. So once you realize that that's what the formula is, it's like, okay, that makes more sense because yeah, that's obviously true. That's obviously true. And we can see that that's true. And I mean, not even from a network standpoint, but from an influencer standpoint, all these, I see so many of these like, tradcon influencer women who are just wearing low-cut blouses on Instagram. Yeah. Talking about politics, none of that is traditional or conservative. Absolutely none of it. So yeah, I mean, it's obviously true that, you know, sexuality is being weaponized or utilized to sell these lady-con influencers because they are really stupid. And it's like, it's no wonder you don't see female conservatives in the debate sphere with feminist because they would just get destroyed.
Yeah, they would do feminist, which just mangled them because they're so stupid. I mean, just ridiculously stupid. I've seen that too. I've seen these tradcon feminists go into debates and they're not equipped to face the lips. They're not at all equipped, not all of them. Now, I've seen a few good ones. Don't get me wrong, but I've seen so many clips where they just get absolutely destroyed, demolished because they just memorized the talking points. They haven't thought through these ideas. They haven't internalized them. They understand that they're pretty. And if they say conservative things, they're going to get lots of attention. Again, not traditional, not conservative. Yeah, I think there was a point in that debate where you said, I can't remember what you said. I just remember her face. And it was just like, she had- Yeah, Apple duties women have. Oh, that was it. It was so funny. It was like, what did you do to say women have towards men? And she was like, well, I just think that men naturally want to provide for men. That was brutal. We, okay, we need to bring up that clip. That men should be douchebags. That all of a sudden, you're a covert feminist. Call me a feminist. I really don't give one crap one way or another,
but I can tell you this. A lot of these men, these podcast hosts on the right, they like to think of themselves as these big masculine men and what are I getting out of it. I can tell you this. There's that feminism. I believe in women as you, right? Yeah, there's the feminism. Oh, and then you're interrupting me too. Didn't take long. They didn't take long to get it. Okay. Yeah. Oh, I'm sorry. Did you want to stick over me? I don't care if you call me. I don't really care if you call me a feminist. You're a strong independent woman. Yeah. Yeah, you're actually interrupting me. I didn't interrupt you when you were spewing your bulls**t. So now it's my turn. Okay. Oh, say not very ladylike. Not very tradcon. Like I said before. So I believe I'm a, there we go. And, you know, don't get me wrong. I don't agree with all of Wilson's tactics. I think that he conducts himself in a way that is decidedly not Christian very often. And I know he, regardless, I don't agree with a lot of it, but I do agree with aggressively pointing out and even mocking the hypocrisy within the conservative movement. That's, we have to do that. We have to root out this feminism. And oftentimes mockery is the best way to do that. I think there's a Christian way. And I think there's lines there that once you cross them,
you're kind of crossing over in a sinful territory. But that doesn't mean that mockery is off the table. It certainly is not Elijah with the profits of bail. Jesus mocked the Pharisees. There we go again. Pierce, I'm a woman of virtue. I happen to be independently successful. I have a husband who's not only a performer professional athlete, but is currently a professional baseball coach. So is he not a masculine man? I mean, I'm confused here. What's your concept of masculine man? I mean, a man who respects me. Yeah, that misses the point though. Like you're still not continuing with the argument that made me. What's your point? Saying inside of society, right? This second, right? Masculinity is not only punished, but also women on the right. Covert feminists on the right are constantly inconsistently talking about how they need to have privilege in society. I want men. Their version of masculinity is men who take care of us, men who protect us, men who do all of this. Those are all duties that men have towards women. Great. What are the duties that women have towards men? What are the duties that women have towards anything? What do men get out of this arrangement? What are we getting out of this arrangement? Can you tell me? I mean, you have an author that said that guy. Well, I don't want to talk about some providers. I'm telling you what, that's how many are born that way. That's how many are born that way. That's how many are born that way. And then I'll come to you, Jess. That's how many are born. That's how many are born. Most men are born to be protectors and providers.
I can't imagine my dad saying, you know what? To my mom, you know what? I'm not going to be a protector and a provider unless you do this. That's not how real men operate. Real men are protectors and providers. And they marry women who have some virtues. Oh, great. A woman telling us what old men are. But I also bring a lot to the table. That sums it up. Oh, great. A woman telling men what men are. That is the problem. It doesn't matter if they're right. Frankly, it doesn't matter if they're right. It's not their place. It's not their place to be lecturing men on masculinity. It's not a good look. And it makes you, it makes you appear to be the feminist that you are. People as well that are great mothers, great wives, caretakers of the home. There's nothing wrong with being a traditional wife and mother. You're misunderstanding me. If you think that I think that women should just be out doing whatever they want, I think that they are. I love you, but women are what real men are. But I don't think a man needs to get something out of it to be a manly man, a protector and a provider. If you think you need to get something out of it, I quite frankly don't consider you a real man. Yeah, she has nothing. She has nothing. But we'll just go through the moment where the rancher Wilson is a real man. Here's fear of life or nothing. I offer nothing. You also mean she's not a thing to me yet.
So I always love having him as though you know that. Let's go to a real man, James Bond. Thank you. Yeah, so that was the debate. I think that pretty much sums it up. The expectation from the quote, Trad Conn women that men perform all of their masculine duties. Meanwhile, they are going on TV. They are getting involved in politics. They are going into the workforce. They're not committing themselves to full-time motherhood. They are dressing like second or third wave feminists. That is not an equivalent arrangement. If men are going to do their masculine duties, the expectation must be from a societal standpoint that women are going to perform their feminine duties. That they will lean into their role as a homemaker as a keeper of the home, Titus 25. And that they are going to be chased and that they are going to be actually traditional. That should be the expectation, but it's not right now. It just isn't. And it's important for conservative commentators, for Christians in particular to point this out. My brother and Christ, God did not design men to be fat and weak, but in this modern age of desk job,
seed oils, trans fats, and artificial sweeteners, becoming fat and weak is almost inevitable. Unless you're disciplined with your habits and with your diet. And I think I've found the best way to remain disciplined with your diet. It's really very simple. Healthy snacks. Which is why I am so excited about our new sponsor, Paleo Valley Guys. It's time to cut out the slop. It's time to cut out the copious amounts of sugar and carbs and get healthy and to do it with Paleo Valley. These are the two staples in my daily diet. Number one, a Paleo Valley protein shake with ice. Coffee and peanut butter. Oh my gosh, trust me, you'll think me later. It's so good. And Paleo Valley's all natural grass-fed beef sticks. They are so good. They have tons of different flavors. They're all amazing. My personal favorite is probably the garlic, some are sausage. But tariyaki is so good too. It's all good. And honestly, guys, my protein shake and my beef sticks are two of my favorite parts of the day. And I'm not exaggerating. So if you're ready to stop being fat and weak,
while simultaneously getting to enjoy something delicious and healthy, head over to PaleoValley.com forward slash Reformation Red Pill or use code Reformation at checkout for 15% off. And you can also save 35% now and 20% for life if you subscribe. You could, like me, have these delicious beef sticks show up at your door every single month. Trust me, it's the best. It truly is. One more time that's PaleoValley.com forward slash Reformation Red Pill. Links are in the description. For women, I'm like, so wait. So you think that I want to get you nice just to watch you happen. That's what you're saying? Great. Well, that's fantastic. Every man on Earth wants to sign up for that. And then if you say that to him, like, well, you're not a real man. You know, a real man will buy me nice. And then just watch how happy I am when I get it. That's what real men do. They're wild. These women are wild and out, especially on the conservative side. In fact, a lot of the feminists, the outright outspoken feminists, act more conservative in their relationships with men than the conservative women do.
Yeah. Significantly more submissive than the conservative counterparts, which is just insane to me. I know I see. Oh, brutal. Brutal. That's, and that's a huge part of this equation. It's not just the public facing persona. It's not just that. What are these women actually like? Do they understand and believe and put into practice the biblical mandate to submit to their own husbands and to obey them? You know, you can tell a lot about a woman from her Instagram profile. If she is showing off her cleavage on Instagram, you can bet that she's not a very submissive obedient wife, generally speaking. If we're going to do the con thing, the trad con thing, you got to do it all the way. And the Bible is what tells us what true, traditional, godly women look like. Anyway, let's keep going. Now, I saw you on whatever. And you're one of the few people that say that there's no difference between conservative and liberal women. Like you hear Farley Kurt and he'll say like, you know, a woman's political opinions matter. And I don't know what you found on whatever. But when I was doing interviews,
I didn't really see a difference. I was like, you can just reprogram her after you. Yeah, well, I mean, there's always going to be individuals who have good political takes who are women. Like that's... This is something I actually appreciate about Andrew. For all simplifies things, often oversimplifies things and say, women, all women or this, all women or that. But Andrew often brings some really helpful nuance. He's like, look, there are going to be women who have good political takes. That doesn't negate the fact that we can speak in generalities. But it is important to offer up that nuance. So you're not making enemies of people who would otherwise be your friends just because you refuse to add nuance. Like that's the case. But you're generally speaking. It's like a general statement. It is true that you can't put a piece of paper between conservative female commentators and feminist female commentators. Like it's a piece of paper between them. And that's what I found too. And when I'm debating, they always use the same talking points. And instantly, you know what's really fun to watch? If you get two conservative females on a panel, and there's like four liberal females, and you start tangling up with both sides, and you watch the sisterhood form instantly.
Right? Suddenly, they're not conservatives or women or liberals. They're women. And you're an evil, oppressive, patriarchal, lunatic man. Right? Instantly, all of the political divide gone. I saw. Which is why, listen, which is why we need to be unapologetically patriarchal. And I'm talking to not just them in, the women in the audience too. And I've got lots of awesome men who follow this channel. The YouTube comments are usually pretty favorable. They're usually pretty good. When I speak on this stuff, I see women in the comments constantly. Yes, amen. That's exactly right. That's what we need. We need unapologetically, do we need to be unapologetically patriarchal? Because that is the enemy of feminism. That is the way the God ordered and structured the world. He ordered and structured the world with, he imbued hierarchy into creation itself. Okay? And hierarchy is not inherently oppressive. It can become oppressive whenever it's perverted by sin. But that's why we need to encourage righteousness. We need to encourage even from a civil perspective, even from the perspective of civil magistrates and our laws and our customs.
We should be encouraging, yes, patriarchy, godly patriarchy specifically. That's what we need. Patriarchy really is inevitable. Like, we do have some of said we have a matriarchy, we have a long house. We talk about the gynecocracy. That's true. We are ruled by feminine sensibilities right now. But we are being ruled by feminine sensibilities at the pleasure of men. Meaning they let this happen. At any point, men could put a stop to it. Because they're the bigger, stronger, sex. They could put a stop to it, but they don't. But they don't. And the time is coming when either men will put a stop to it in a tyrannical fashion and we will have an actual toxic patriarchy or Christians will put a stop to it. Christian men will put a stop to it in a godly fashion in a way that honors women and honors them as the weaker vessel. So that's what we need. I saw that with the Nala. That was crazy. All of the, oh my gosh Michael, have you debated him yet? He won't debate. I've asked multiple times, requested multiple times live. And I know that Brian whatever is requested it, multiple times, the guy won't debate. Yeah. You know, it's really funny for the guy who always gets a lot of
it. The roster of men that I've debated is massive. The roster of men, most of my critics has debate. Zero. Zero. So it's like, I'm just equal about it. Right? I don't care if you're a f***** idiot who's a guy or a girl. Right? Both of you. You're an equal opportunity. An opportunity is when it comes to that. So with Knowles though, yeah, I would be happy to him. All of those guys on the daily wire was always happy to tango, especially Klaven. After I saw the Klaven interview, he did, I was like, oh man, I want to tear Klaven so bad on this either because they're just clueless. If no idea what they're talking about. Yeah, what are your biggest disagreements with them? Like, what would you? If I were to take like the daily wire or T.U.S.A. All of them. If you were going to, if you were going to do you versus like 10 of them, what would be like the points you brought up? Well, the first thing I would do is I would say, like, you guys publicly lie a lot about the idea of women in your organizations because when I talk to the T.P. USA people on the ground privately, who are at universities, organizers, things like that, they're like, Andrew, I totally agree with everything you're saying. These women are completely, they're a big problem to have an organization. You know what I mean? I wish more people would tango level them. They know it's an issue. They just pretend it's not and why? It's because they want a groundswell support from conservative women. That's what they're after, right? And that's tough. That's so tough because look,
I get the appeal of being able to remain totally ideological, ideologically pure. That is one of the privileges of being a dissident whenever you're not actually trying to attain and wield political power. You're not trying to infiltrate, get into organizations or the government itself. You don't have to play the game when you're a dissident. You can just be ideological, ideologically pure. You can just say what's true. But if you actually want to get into institutions and subvert, you have to hide your power levels. You actually do have to do that. And we need both. We actually need both. And so I think that on the one side, if you're getting into these institutions and you're trying to attain and wield political power, you do have to play the game. You have to be judicious and prudent in what you say. That's all true. I don't think you should out-write lie about an issue like this. I think you can acknowledge the problem. But even with this, especially with how hot this issue is, of all the issues that I constantly hammer on,
this is the one. When I poke the feminist idol and I, the vitriol that I get is wild. It's wild, guys. This is one of the most foundational little G gods of our modern civil religion of gay race communism. It really is. It's one of the foundational gods. We must tear it down. But you have to be judicious. I agree that people need to be speaking out against it. But you have to do it in a prudent way. But like I said, we need that interplay between the people who are hiding their power levels, getting into institutions and influencing people, kind of being a bridge to some of these more dissident views. Because they actually, you know, they're gained the audience. They're able to speak to millions. And oftentimes they're actually gaining political power, which is very, very good. Political power that, or, yeah, political power specifically, that a lot of people in the dissident category could not attain to because of the things they say publicly. But we need that interplay. We need the dissidents to understand, hey, we got these good guys on the inside,
hiding their power levels. And we need those guys to not demonize the dissidents and say, yeah, keep going, keep going, keep pushing, keep pushing. Anyway, that's the, that's a very important interplay that you guys need to understand. Not demonize each other. Like the, I don't know, the Michael Noilsers of the world and the Charlie Kirk's of the world. They were excellent coalition builders. They're, they're, yeah, they're on the inside. They're getting close to political power, influencing very powerful people. And they hold most of the right views actually behind closed doors. They can't say it all out loud. And that's good. We actually need that. And the dissidents are going to be pulling the over to the window and providing opportunities for the guys on the inside. Men, what have I told you that for less than the cost of a couple drive-through coffees, you could have premium gourmet coffee delivered straight to your door every single month. And you could even win a free riverfront getaway in the process. Life good news for you. That's exactly what I'm telling you. Montana Coffee Company is a Christian owned, veteran owned coffee company that is committed
to producing exceptional coffee without compromising their values. They are base Christian brothers. They make excellent coffee and they are fully in support of our mission to make America Christian again. Ten out of ten highly recommend their new subscription program ensures that you will never run out of the fuel you need for those early mornings of prayer, Bible study, and mindlessly scrolling through social media, brain rot. I'm just kidding. You guys would never do that. I know you would never do that. Right now, the first 50 subscribers are entered to win a free weekend stay in a beautiful riverfront cabin from river walk properties in Fayetteville, Tennessee. Plus a complete Montana coffee bundle. Head over to Montana Coffee Company today. Sign up for their subscription and use code Reformation for 15% off your order. Bryce's King drink accordingly. The problem is they're not actually speaking to real conservative women's issues. And real conservative women's issues are not about these stupid idea of baking bread, wearing a sudden dress.
And that's what it's become. So, the first thing I would dive into is like, what are the women's issues between the left and the right? Right? That you find makes the woman a right-winger or a left-winger. What are these actual issues? Where's the divide here? I don't think they could give me an answer. I don't think they could actually give me an answer. I think that they would end up saying a bunch of social issues that were all left-wing based. All of them. So, what would be your next point with them? So, the first part would be about college and the other way around. Yeah, well, the first point would be to ask what the distinctions, what they would consider the actual distinctions between the behaviors of conservative and liberal progressive women. What are they? I don't think they could give me many. The second would be to ask why they sent them to these dens of inequity when they know that that's a terrible idea. And the third is why it is that they refuse to engage in any of the points of the Red Pill in order to either a, refute them, or b, adopt them, but give a Christian prescription correct for what it is. Or, see, just like blow them all out. You have to either offer the refutation at some point, or you're going to get dominated by the ideology. These are supposed to be Christian conservative commentators. That's good. I want to go back to what they said, what he said about number two. For what it is. Or I think you were talking about sending women to college.
Look, I'm not against women going to college in principle. I am against them going off to college. Let's actually, let me rephrase that. I'm not against women getting an education. I think that it can be very good for a woman to really pursue deepening her knowledge and her wisdom. I think that would be best done either online under the protection of her father in his father's, and her father's household, or perhaps like a community college or something like that where she stays at home. I think, well, I don't think that, that is a far superior situation than anything else, because what's going on right now is they are going out from the protection of their fathers. Now, unfortunately, so many fathers don't even understand as their duty to protect their daughters until they receive, until they actually find a husband. But what's happening right now is they're going out from the protection of their fathers, and they are basically marrying the state, or the institution. It starts with college where they're indoctrinated into gay race communism,
and then they effectively begin to, instead of understanding their husband and fathers or protector, they are looking to pass policies and pursue, like I said, this gay race communism that sees the state as the protector, as their father, as their daddy to give them privileges and to protect them. This is not the state's duty. The state makes a terrible daddy. All right, makes a terrible daddy. So that's a huge problem. So I'm okay with women getting an education. I think it's a really bad idea to send your daughters off to college, generally speaking. Or, you know, see, just like blow them all out, right? You have to either offer the reputation at some point, or you're going to get dominated by the ideology. These are supposed to be Christian conservative commentators. The only one I've ever seen in the Red Pill doing battle with these guys is me. I've never seen anybody else doing it. And things... We'll be in coach. We'll be in coach. So funny, even though I fight with Red Pill guys constantly, I'm constantly debating with them. I get associated with Red Pill because I won't take any from these feminist women. That would be my next question if you could... Yeah, that's the same with me.
Like, I'm much closer to like an Andrew Wilson than I am to Andrew Tade or a Myron Games. Absolutely. No question about that. But, well, and that's because what's going on is the Red Pill guys who are actually acknowledging the problems. They're acknowledging the depths. How truly rotten feminism is and how it's rotted out our culture. And so whenever you start to acknowledge the same problems that they're acknowledging, you start getting lumped in. Even though you have some very substantive disagreements on the solutions. If you consider yourself Red Pill at all? I think that descriptors from Red Pillers are often fine. Like, descriptions of what's going on is fine. Yeah, I think that's the time they come out with prescriptors. They're terrible and stupid and kind of... So like, with guys who are saying, sleep with multitudes of women to like experience a level of, I think that that's dumb. I think if they're saying things like... Do you think it works though? No. No, it doesn't work. You don't think women treat men... Who has access to that? Like, this teeny tiny percentage of men, how's that going to help in men in general? Well, I'm not talking about men in general.
I'm talking about like individual men. Like, if they're trying it and coming back and saying that this helped them in their life, like, you can't really argue with that. Yeah, but I mean, you can say the same thing with heroin. You can say the same thing with crack, whatever you want it. You know, I tried helping in this portion of my life. It's like, I still wouldn't give it as a prescription for people to do. You know? Yeah, but... When I was really down and out, here's an easy one. When I was really down and out. Yeah, that's the thing. We're not utilitarians. We don't just offer up solutions because it might or might not be helpful in the short term. In the long run, we must adhere strictly to the word of God in its prescriptions. If we do not, if we go with something that's strictly utilitarian because it seems like it's going to help, we're going to go off the rails and it's going to have long term deleterious effects, obviously. Down and out after a breakup, I would drink way too much. That doesn't mean I would give that out as a prescription that men drink way too much after a breakup. Yeah, but I don't really see it as like, they're telling men what to do. I just think it's more like, if you want to do this, this is how to do it. Yeah, I agree. But that would again be a descriptor instead of a prescriptor. It's the guys who give it as a prescription or the pickup dating or as community does this a lot. Yeah, like live how I live. Yeah, here's the various prescriptions or what society should be doing or things like this.
That's where they were to fall, but a lot. And you've got to take some of the descriptors with the grain assault, too. They're not always true. With pair bonding studies aren't always true. There's lots of stuff you've got to be careful about. I just think anecdotally, though. I think most men, like women just tend to abuse men that they're their only source of sex. And that's where the problem comes in. Well, what do you mean? Like women just have a tendency to not, like, I don't know, I see so many men where they're married and the wife knows that he doesn't cheat. And she just does not appreciate his loyalty. And I see women where they think that the husband either could cheat or would cheat. And they just tend to treat him better. Yeah, tend to behave better. Yeah, and I think that's like, that's what I was saying where as much as you don't like it, I can see why. Yeah, but can it be that luminous implicit threat without it ever being stated? Like, I think there can be. And I think that those guys, a lot of those guys who can do that, they don't even bother saying what do they need to say it for? They can just tell her. Yeah, you don't need to tell her, right? It's not important. So how is that? But how is that a prescription? There's such a small select few guys. And this gets into this is more of a critique on Pearl. She does, she can't think like a question
because she's not a Christian. She doesn't have the Holy Spirit, right? She believes that the best way to motivate a man or a woman or a relationship. Is this kind of threat of cheating. Like, you might cheat on me so I need to put out. Or you have the opportunity to cheat on me. So therefore I should give you lots of sex. No, actually the proper motivation here would be, let's get back to it. The word of God, God says, do not withhold sex from one another. God says that your body is belong to each other. And because of what Christ has done for you, you actually want to obey him and you want to love your wife or the wife wants to love her husband in that way. Even if she has to kind of muster up and well, not even just muster up. Even if she has to see it as a duty rather than just a delight that she's always just ready and willing and so excited about it. But she does see it somewhat as a duty. That's fine. That's good.
It is good to do your duty toward one another. And you do it not because you're getting like a quid pro quo situation, but because God says so. And because Jesus, the man Jesus Christ died for you and he proved his love for you. He filled you with his love and now you want to pour that love out for the people in your life, first and foremost, your husband and your wife. Okay. These are, like this is the motivational structure for the Christian, but like Pearl can't wrap her mind around that because she doesn't understand that the gospel of Jesus Christ actually transforms people, which it does. Few guys who can do that. Who have... Do you know what? Yeah. I think it's more common than you think. I met this guy the other day. He was like five, seven, overweight. He was showing me his rotation. It was like five, twenty, two, 23 year old women. Is it rich? No. He was just a good talker. He was just easy to talk to. So I don't know if it's like from what I've seen, the P-Ways, I don't think they're always the most attractive, like a rich guy. Like sometimes they're just charming. They're also con artists a lot of them. They're conning, right? Like they make that up. Like they guy Johnny Anthony, a lifestyle called con artist, just made it all up.
You know, I've got an 8,000 body. He's like, shut up dude. And then the guy tells me he's like, I've never met a pickup artist in the world who hasn't done it one or two. And I'm like, I'm like, what dude? What? He's like, yeah, never met one who hasn't. And I'm like, he's pretty sure most of them don't. But so the thing is, it's like a lot of those guys are fully about the whole work. No, I've gone to events. Like I've seen them take the women home. And a lot of times it's really not. It's not always the best looking guys. They're just charming. By the way, I like how Andrew is like just a contrarian. Like he's always going to argue. And I noticed I met him at the TPUSA event that he trained up a lot of the up and coming debaters and whatever I talk to him. It was literally like the conversation was almost a debate. He just takes the opposing view. But he's just constantly trying like he's, you know, he's designed that way. He's trying to get down to the truth. And whether it's a formal debate or a conversation, he's going to play the contrarian, see if you know your stuff and then try to get closer and closer to what's true, which I really appreciate that about him. I got to. I remain skeptical in this regard. Yeah, I mean, it's by like one of the PUA's I met in like Vega.
He was not attractive at all. I mean, some are, right? Like a lot of like a good amount of art. But there's enough that aren't good looking that like you would, I'm surprised you would like you would be surprised just from what I've seen. Yeah, I mean, I'm sure that there's again, there's going to be men who you know are exceptions to these rules, you know what I mean? But I don't think for the most part, it's available to most men to be able to go sleep with whatever type of woman they want. I know it's just the challenges. There's just no incentive to be loyal today. Like what do they get out of? The title here is the problem with female conservative debaters, which we talked about early on. And now they've just kind of gone astray. So they were going to land the plane here. Yeah, we need to be done with conservative boss babes. I think we can all agree. No more conservative boss babes were done with women in the conservative movement who pursue the policies of first wave feminism, who pursue the career path and lifestyle of second wave feminism and dress like with all of the sexual promiscuity of third wave feminists. We're done with that.
By the grace of God, we'll be done with that. We got to call it out when we see it. And we need to resolve in ourselves to, you're going to take arrows. Look, you're going to take arrows if you're going to unapologetically promote patriarchy, if you're going to unapologetically attack the idol of feminism. You're going to take some arrows, just get ready for it. Just get ready for it because we have to win. We have to win. We have to reorder our society the way that God has subscribed for us, both in scripture and in nature. As to with that, guys, patronize our sponsors. It means a ton to me. Truly, uh, paleo valley, Montana, coffee. Go pick some up right now. It means a lot whenever you guys, look, I just, I actually DM some of you guys are DMing me saying you guys are picking up the stuff. And you guys, you have no idea how much that means to me. Join our club, all that good stuff. Now get out there and build, defend, and expand the kingdom of all Lord Jesus Christ. Congratulations TOY w
More episodes
More from Fight Laugh Feast USA

Charlie Kirk’s China Warning: “America Must Shape Up, or China Wins” [China Comp...
Fight Laugh Feast USA

Let’s talk Ozempic...again! [Waterbreak]
Fight Laugh Feast USA

The Servant Jesus Called Wicked and Lazy [Eschatology Matters]
Fight Laugh Feast USA

Re-evaluating the Christian Political and Legal Imagination [God, Law, and Liber...
Fight Laugh Feast USA