Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
educationFeb 27, 202426:54pending

Can States Prohibit Social Media Platforms From Censoring Opposing Viewpoints? The Supreme Court Just Heard Oral Arguments and Here's How The Justices Are Feeling. Plus More.

About this episode

1. DEEP DIVE: Supreme Court to Decide Whether States Can Ban Social Media Censorship of Opposing Viewpoints (1:08)2. QUICK HITTERS: Air Force Member Sets Self on Fire Outside Israel Embassy in DC (18:54); Republican National Committee Chair and Co-Chair to Step Down Following South Carolina Primary (19:56); Donald Trump Wins South Carolina Primary, Super PAC Pulls Funding From Haley (21:46); FTC Sues to Block $25B Kroger/Albertsons Merger (22:57); United States Will Soon Lose Communication with Private Moon Lander (24:21); Trump and Co-Defendants Appeal Engoron's NYC Judgment (25:15)If you enjoyed this episode, please leave me a review and share it with those you know that also appreciate unbiased news!Watch this episode on YouTube.Follow Jordan on Instagram and TikTok.All sources for this episode can be found here.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Get every episode summarized

Each time UNBIASED Politics publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Can States Prohibit Social Media Platforms From Censoring Opposing Viewpoints? The Supreme Court Just Heard Oral Arguments and Here's How The Justices Are Feeling. Plus More.

UNBIASED Politics

0:00
26:54

More episodes

More from UNBIASED Politics

View all episodes →