About this episode
Today’s episode is the jackpot for Supreme Court bingo players, as our hosts play a guessing game as to which justices will write some of the court’s most anticipated forthcoming opinions. Also on today’s episode, David and Sarah chat about two cases involving racial classification in the dispensation of government relief to “socially disadvantaged” farmers and ranchers, and debate which Supreme Court cases AP U.S. history students should be required to commit to memory. Plus, Sarah shares a fun story about her experience camping outside of the Supreme Court building to hear oral arguments for D.C. v. Heller.
Show Notes:
-Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
-Ferris v. United States
-Trump v. Hawaii
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Advisory Opinions publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Advisory Opinions
Justice Alito Stays Ruling on Abortion Pill by Mail
Advisory Opinions
May 5, 20261:18:59pending
Gutting the Voting Rights Act | Interview: Judge Roy K. Altman
Advisory Opinions
Apr 30, 20261:24:21pending
Arguing In Front of SCOTUS | Interview: Lisa Blatt
Advisory Opinions
Apr 28, 20261:15:07pending
Overturning Religious Precedent
Advisory Opinions
Apr 23, 20261:28:11pending