Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsOct 25, 202329:54pending

But, Maybe, Logic Games Were… Good?

About this episode

LSAT's decision is not totally... illogical. ----------- The LSAT is ditching logic games from upcoming tests and the Above the Law gang is conflicted over whether or not that's a good thing. There's a good argument that the section disproportionately disadvantaged folks with vision issues. On the other hand that was a deficiency that admissions could address on the back end, but without that score schools no longer have a pattern recognition evaluation -- and what's more "thinking like a lawyer" than pattern recognition? We also discuss NYU Law Review getting sued by Stephen Miller and a lawyer citing Hitler approvingly.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

But, Maybe, Logic Games Were… Good?

Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

0:00
29:54

More episodes

More from Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer

View all episodes →