
About this episode
Rudy Giuliani has come out of retirement for the first time in 28 years to litigate on behalf of the Trump campaign. To say his gears were a little rusty would be the understatement of the century: Giuliani walked into court this week and couldn’t remember the name of the judge, couldn’t remember the name of his opposing counsel, couldn’t remember the meaning of “opacity,” and couldn’t argue the proper standard of review in the case. As our podcast hosts remind us, effective lawyers not only know how to make a constructive argument, but also tailor their advocacy to the humanity of the judge. Giuliani did neither of these things. After catching up on the latest election litigation disputes, David and Sarah discuss imminent lawless action in the context of the First Amendment and two of their favorite television shows.
Show Notes:
-Morse v. Frederick.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Advisory Opinions publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Advisory Opinions

Justice Alito Stays Ruling on Abortion Pill by Mail
Advisory Opinions
May 5, 20261:18:59pending

Gutting the Voting Rights Act | Interview: Judge Roy K. Altman
Advisory Opinions
Apr 30, 20261:24:21pending

Arguing In Front of SCOTUS | Interview: Lisa Blatt
Advisory Opinions
Apr 28, 20261:15:07pending

Overturning Religious Precedent
Advisory Opinions
Apr 23, 20261:28:11pending