
About this episode
Minnesota and Illinois are suing the Trump administration to slow down or reshape ICE operations—using the language of federalism and constitutional rights to challenge how immigration law is enforced. Todd Huff breaks down what these lawsuits are really arguing (administrative warrants, “sensitive locations,” and claims of political retaliation), and why the bigger story is a sudden left-wing “concern” for federalism only when enforcement shows up in blue jurisdictions. He also revisits Arizona v. United States and explains the difference between civil immigration removal and criminal conviction—plus why enforcement isn’t “punishment,” it’s the federal government doing its job.
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Todd Huff Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Todd Huff Show

Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
The Todd Huff Show
Sep 4, 202640:51completed

James Talarico's War on Capitalism
The Todd Huff Show
Sep 3, 202640:51completed

The Lindsay Clancy Defense Concedes the Facts
The Todd Huff Show
Sep 2, 202640:51pending

Everything Is Not a Conspiracy
The Todd Huff Show
Sep 1, 202640:51pending