
About this episode
Featuring:
- Lori Calvasina, Managing Director & Head of US Equity Strategy at RBC Capital Markets
- Jennifer Huddleston, Senior Research Fellow at the Cato Institute
- US Energy Secretary Christopher Wright
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Bloomberg Surveillance publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
487 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Bloomberg Surveillance — Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 14th, 2026. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
If you invest, lead a business, or allocate capital, one-sided views aren't enough. Join me, Brad Rogoff, the Global Head of Research at Barclays, on the Flipside podcast. Each month, I go head-to-head with one of our expert analysts on my global team to debate the economic and market issues that matter most. From inflation and AI to equity and credit trends, each debate helps you see what headlines might miss. Find the Flipside wherever you get your podcasts. Seventeen courts, hundreds of matches, thousands of points, all happening simultaneously during the US Open. And you can't possibly be there for everything. That's why IBM helps bring together billions of data points with more than 20 years of player history. We scores, stats, insights, and highlights behind every moment, so nothing gets missed. IBM, let's create smarter business. Adventure Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done.
Through innovation, venture global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's venture global. That's unstoppable energy. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. We begin the sad.
We're stocks tumbling as a potential AI pullback rattles investors. The anthropic CEO, Daria Moda, presenting a three-step plan with the goal of pacing the frontier. Laurie Cabasino of RBC joined us now for more. Laurie Good morning. Good morning. How much earnings risk is building here? So look, one of the things we've been doing in our modeling is just taking the bottom up consensus and hair cutting it by 10%. In previous versions, earlier in the summer, we were baking a 5% haircut to account for the non-AI stocks, potentially having some pressures from the Iran War, inflation, etc. In our last couple of updates, we've expanded that to 10% to potentially account for some froth on the AI side of things. Not that we were pounding the table and saying it was going to happen, but there has been some concern building on that front for a few months now. So we wanted to reflect that in their numbers to try to calm investors nerves a bit. Do you think there is a slumber buildout on the horizon here? So it's funny, if you look at CapEx data, and I will say this has been a set of charts in our deck that's been a bit more popular over the last few months, and it doesn't necessarily have big do this, do that conclusions.
It's just interesting. But we look at CapEx growth in the S&P 500. The two Q updates are actually showing it hitting new highs year over year. If you look at the top 10 market cap names, which is where you've got the big AI behemoths, you've been hitting sort of peaks essentially. If you look at the rest of the other 490 stocks, you're very, very early days in a CapEx buildout cycle. So you're up maybe third innings. You're showing some growth year over year that became much more apparent and too Q. And we've been telling people if you're concerned about the CapEx story going forward, take your attention off those top 10 market cap names. Look at the rest of the index and you're going to laugh. It'll give you like one example from the last reporting season as I got very excited reading insurance companies. And I called up one of my healthcare analysts and our insurance analysts and I said this is really interesting stuff because I'm seeing companies, there was one company in particular that was sort of saying we're not engaged in FOMO here. But then they went on to talk about how they were doing these upgrades or thinking about these upgrades. And AI was kind of prompting that. So that's been an element that we've been trying to focus people on.
Are you starting to get some CapEx upgrades, IT upgrades, AI sparking it, maybe not the only thing that's happening. But that to me is sort of the more interesting part of the story is some of these derivative impacts. How immune is that story to the frontier models and more specifically to successful IPO is of the likes of Anthropic and next year of OpenAI? You know, I'm not sure I have the answer to that question to be honest. I know that right now though kind of going back to the original issue we're dealing with is that there's just a lot of jitters in the market. And we made a comment last week and our weekly that we were expecting a five to 10% pull down. We thought that those risks had risen. We've got midterm elections. The last couple of cycles you've seen extreme volatility in both directions in the back half of the year. We've got interest rate risk and I don't care what's going on when the bond market and macro investors are worried about interest rates rising. Everything else hits harder. So I think that's part of what we're doing. We've got a new Fed chair. You typically see volatility in markets when you're ushering in new leadership at the Fed. We've seen that in Worsh's three predecessors.
And we've also got the war, frankly, which a lot of companies didn't really, frankly, talk that much about this last reporting season. But two reporting seasons ago, a lot of them were saying they expected it to be wrapped up by the summer or two queue and that hasn't happened. So you've got a lot wane on this market right now. That's a pretty big laundry list. And somebody could say, I don't know that I want to come in and buy stocks after a five to 10% pull back. If you haven't resolved the war, you've got diesel prices over six dollars a gallon. You have questions, existential questions around some of the frontier models of AI. And frankly, interest rates are going to challenge some of the multiples. Why should you pick that up, given the fact that so many people come on, they're like, yeah, buy it. I'm excited for this. Well, we're sort of believers of the idea that there's not just one thing that drives markets, right? There are many things that drive markets. And when we look at the GDP backdrop in particular, we've seen consensus. We've seen RBC economists over the summer kind of move up to a low two percent type number. And that's traditionally a very favorable environment for the stock market. So I think we have to sort of get through this period and then look and see,
do we still think the underlying economy is strong right now? The number suggests yes. If you also look historically at what happens to markets when the Fed is hiking, if it's a 12 month time frame and you're doing like one to four high, it's certainly markets actually been pretty strong. But when you do more than four, right? If we start talking about six, seven, eight, and a 12 month time frame, that's when the stock market tends to struggle. Like when our rates strategist last week, he had not been looking for hikes. He's changed his call now. He's looking for three, but he's calling them adjustment hikes. An adjustment height kind of world that spells to me short term volatility, but you can recover from that. But if we start talking about a different story, our modeling suggests we'll have bigger problems. What would you need to see potentially to bring down your price target? So, you know, we've moved to a rolling 12 month forward process. So we're constantly trying to use that 12 month forward target as a longer term bogey. We're not trying to sort of adjust, you know, a December 31st number in the short term. We're trying to talk about, you know, sort of the short term through our four tiers if you're a framework, which is where that five to 10% drawdown comes.
And, you know, one of the things that's been coming up in conversations if you look at the market last year around tariffs, we had, what was it like, a 18, 19% drawdown? And we still had a pretty healthy year. And what I was astounded by at the time was, I remember getting out on the road in June and talking to investors. Now, yeah, we're done with 2025. We're looking ahead to 2026, whatever damage happens this year because of tariffs. We already paid the price for it. So that's one thing that I think makes price target very tricky when you're trying to sort through short term issues. Tariffs are a lot different than $4.30 a gallon nationally on gasoline, more than $6 a gallon on diesel. How much is going to impact small companies? So, you know, what I've been a little more focused on, I do think, you know, consumers, I think is one thing in the crosshairs of those oil price forecasts, but also just looking at inflation forecasts for the middle of next year. Because if you look at consensus numbers, they're for like 2% year, 2-ish percent in change, you know, year over year on a headline basis. And as we've talked to some economists around the street, that seems to really be baking and some normalized gas prices,
you know, coming in, the war threatens that, right? And so we're not really seeing those numbers move yet and the economics community, but I think it's something to pay attention to. You beginning to think about 2028. You have to think earlier and earlier at this point. I mean, we haven't done a 2027 year ahead for cash. Seems well done, though, but you've probably took us that. But I will say, John, like moving to this 12 month forward price target has actually been very useful this year because it really does force us to separate the short-term issues from the longer-term issues. And longer-term, I'm still seeing a case for bounce back right now after we work through a period of angst. We constantly reevaluate this. We update all the models once a month. But right now, we're not seeing the longer-term story derailed. Stay with us, Moulinburg-Sovietans coming up after this.
Some people treat Chachy-P-T like some kind of smart search engine. And some use it to get work done. Chachy-P-T work is a new way of working in Chachy-P-T that can take action across your apps and files, stay with a project for hours if needed, and turn a goal into finished work. It's designed to help you move from a chaotic starting point to a reviewable first version. So all the soon-to-beginning models you've seen are the new models that you've seen. And you can see the new model of the new model that you've seen. This is the first version. So all the source materials, briefs, and scattered information that you have to grind through to turn into something useful can just become something useful. Put Chachy-P-T to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chachy-P-T.com by selecting Work Mode, available on plus and pro plans. You already know how AI is changing how everyday work gets done, how much ground you can cover, and how fast a team can scale. You need the tools to give you a competitive advantage, built for this new era.
Welcome to Agenetic Revenue. Adio is the CRM for this world. It meets you where you work. Compounds every customer signal into context, then acts on it across your pipeline to let you move it on match speed and scale. With agents and animations for every job in revenue, Adio orchestrates your work around the clock, built to handle the scale of your workloads, extensible with API, and MCP, and with the infrastructure to keep up with your most ambitious agents. Loved by high growth startups like Granola, Modal, and Edge, Adio runs the work behind every win. That's Adio, the Agenetic CRM, the intelligent system that never sleeps. Picks up leads at 2 a.m. Catches renewals before they slip. Hands you the answer before you ask. Try Adio free at adio.com slash iHeart. That's adio.com slash iHeart. Jennifer Houdlson of the Canon Institute writes the following, there is a significant difference between companies choosing to pause
and a government mandate that could pause all AI development. Jennifer joins us now for more. Jennifer, welcome. I've heard this over the weekend. I wonder what your perspective is on it. If they want to slow down, why don't they just slow down? I think that's exactly one of the options. If an individual company wants to not advance with their product, they have the right as an innovator, as an entrepreneur to say, this is where we're stopping. But what we will likely see in those cases is others in the market. This is a very competitive market. Continue with some of those beneficial applications of more advanced AI. While a lot of the conversation around this has been about the potentially risky impacts of AI, we also have to consider what this means for many of the significant benefits of AI, whether it's the ability to respond to some of these same cybersecurity concerns or whether it's some of the amazing advancements we're seeing in fields like medical research. Also, of course, when it comes to the DOD, they find this research and AI to be just paramount to what they're doing right now.
But Jennifer, when it comes to these companies that all want an edge for one of them to hold back, don't they all need to agree? Well, one of the things that we could see evolve on some of these very specific issues, some of these very specific concerns around things like cybersecurity are the emergence of industry norms are some forms of self regulation as opposed to top-down government regulation. One of the advantages of that, particularly in a fast moving space like AI, is that it can be much more adaptive as new risk emerged, but also as new potential benign or beneficial elements emerge. When we're looking at government regulation, government regulation is a very static element. It's something that takes quite a while to evolve as a technology evolves while technology, particularly in the AI space, is very dynamic. And so you could end up with a sort of pacing problem where even if technology is good and beneficial, it's unable to go forward if a government regulation is particularly
outdated. When it comes to government regulation and any sort of government involvement, does it come from Congress or is this going to be through the executive branch? When we're talking about this type of major issue, you're likely to need some sort of congressional framework at some point. What's also been concerning is the number of states that have started to act around AI issues. And that's also something to certainly consider in the scenario. What will this mean in various state legislatures that have considered potential action on AI? How might an AI patchwork be disruptive to the industry and to the development of those norms? We have, of course, seen various executive orders around AI and we've seen significant changes in different administrations around those executive orders. This didn't just start with the current Trump and Biden administrations. There have also been AI executive orders going all the way back to the Obama administration. Jennifer, there are a lot of concerns here about artificial intelligence from increasing cost of electricity to water usage,
to now the eradication of humanity. But I am wondering these are very different risks, right? One of them is a quality of life. One questions about cybersecurity risks opening up to a lot of different companies versus, you know, this being compared to a nuclear weapon. How should we look at this? Should some of the AI advancements be treated as nuclear products or more just as technology that needs to be regulated with growing pains, clearly manifesting themselves? When we're talking about artificial intelligence, we're largely talking about concerns around specific applications. And so it's very unlikely that in most cases we're going to be looking at any kind of regulation of the technology as a whole or that something that should certainly give us haws because usually those concerns about the harms are more tied to a specific application of the technology. When it comes to a lot of those concerns, there are existing laws in play already around things like cybersecurity, around things like fraud, around any number of potential cases
where a bad actor could use this technology to do a bad thing. When it comes to some of the other concerns we've seen recently arise as it relates to artificial intelligence, things that you mentioned, like electricity caused or light growing demands on resources, this should actually be serve as a good opportunity to have a broader policy discussion about those underlying issues, not just as they relate to artificial intelligence, but as they relate to things like our grid and our water uses more general. I guess that what I'm getting at Jennifer is how much is this the normal growing pains of new technology? How much can this be likened to the ad van or the birth and proliferation of the railroads versus say the nuclear treaties and different types of discussions that happened during the Cold War? I mean, there are two very different discussions, which do you think is most appropriate? One of the things that makes artificial intelligence so unique is how general purpose of a technology is. And that's why we often see what seem like very different
conversations going on at once. Artificial intelligence is an incredible tool for access to information. And of course, there are a lot of different forms of information one can access, but I think that also has to be part of the thought and the conversation here, particularly when we're talking about potential regulation, what does it mean for the government to be the one that can dictate how this technology can evolve versus something that we can see emerge more from these industry norms. This is a bit of a thought exercise, of course, but I love your input on this by the time we get to 28 and the general in this country, the next presidential race. What do you think regulation looks like? How much do you think it's changed if at all? I think it will be interesting to see particularly what happens at a state level. Do we see that kind of congressional framework that US approach to AI policy? And if so, isn't an approach that continues to take the light touch that has really allowed the US to excel in areas like the internet, or is it something that's much more regulatory
something that could make it much harder for some of those benign and beneficial applications of AI to go forward? I also think the other thing that will be interesting to see come 2028 is what do we even consider AI? Because as we get more and more use to certain technologies, we cease to think about them as AI. Very few of us think about the auto complete on our emails as a form of artificial intelligence. We don't think about the customer service chatbot that we might interact with before getting connected to a human when we've been in a request as artificial intelligence. How has that also changed by 2028? Stay with us, Moulin-Pleumberg-Sophane is coming up after this. Some people treat Chachy-P-T like some kind of smart search engine and some use it to get work done. Chachy-P-T work is a new way of working in Chachy-P-T that can take action across your apps and files, stay with a project for hours if needed, and turn a goal into finished work.
It's designed to help you move from a chaotic starting point to a reviewable first version. So all the source materials briefs and scattered information that you have to grind through to turn into something useful can just become something useful. Put Chachy-P-T to work on your most ambitious ideas and projects. Get started at chachy-P-T dot com by selecting work mode, available on plus and pro plans. You already know how AI is changing how everyday work gets done, how much ground you can cover, and how fast a team can scale. To stay ahead, you need the tools to give you a competitive advantage built for this new era. Welcome to a GenteG revenue. Adio is the CRM for this world. It meets you where you work. Compounds every customer signal into context, then acts on it across your pipeline to let you move it on match speed and scale. With agents and animations for every job in revenue, Adio orchestrates your work around the clock, built to handle the scale of your workloads, extensible with API, and MCP, and with the infrastructure to keep up with your most ambitious agents.
Loved by high growth startups like Granola, Modal, and Edge, Adio runs the work behind every win. That's Adio, the agent at CRM, the intelligent system that never sleeps. Picks up leads at 2 a.m. Catches renewals before they slip. Hands you the answer before you ask. Try Adio free at adio.com slash iHeart. That's adio.com slash iHeart. This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem? Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other. One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. That's software overload. Odo is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try Odo for free at oduo.com. That's oduo.com.
Let's turn to energy. Crude rising this morning as export risk continues to build in the Middle East. The run and golf states delaying talks on a temporary shipping lane through the straight of four murs and Saudi Arabia closing a key alternative route. Joining us now to discuss the US Energy Secretary Chris Reim. Mr. Secretary, thank you for your time this morning. We appreciate it. A critical juncture to have this conversation on Middle Eastern energy exports. What is your peers in the Middle East? What are the energy secretaries across the Middle East including policymakers in Saudi Arabia saying about what's going to happen to the US pipeline? Well, this is not new for strikes on this energy infrastructure. And of course, unfortunately Iran's done that ton of that. But they've proven resourceful in the past. I think you'll see the pipeline back running very soon. Have you spoken to your Saudi counterpart? Why do you think very soon? Can you give us a timeframe? I might have more of a timeframe tomorrow.
But yes, I've been in close contact from him since hours after the attack started. And so they've been very carefully assessing what the damage was, what needs to be done. And I think more clarity on that will come out very soon. As you know Secretary Wright, that's seven million barrels a day in terms of capacity. How much right now do you see oil flowing through the Red Sea, which with the Bob Elmondebs, straight in the Houthis, really asserting more of their power? How much do you see flow of energy through that passageway? Well, there's about a few million barrels a day going through. But most of it has not gone through the Babel Mandep. Most of it has gone the other way through the Suez Canal and the pipeline there at Egypt. So like energy gets to markets. I just got the latest data from last night and flows through the straight over 12 million barrels of oil and oil products flow through the straight of Hormuz last night. The running seven day average is over 10 million barrels a day and on a gradual upward trend.
We will see continued increase in energy flows out of the Arabian Gulf region. That will not be stopped by any activity Iran does. Bumps on the road, of course, but those are temporary bumps. When it comes to the straight of Hormuz, 12 million barrels a day is north of what you said just a few weeks ago, 10 million barrels a day. How are those vessels getting out? So just to clarify, I often give 12 million is yesterday. The running average is a little over 10 million barrels a day. But I think you'll see that running average continue to go up. So these ships are escorted by the US joint force. They're defended. They're mostly done at night. Of course, all the transponders are turned off, which is why the commercial shipping monitors just haven't had an ability to see it. And people think I give another opinion every morning I get a report of every single ship, the ship name exactly what its cargo was, and then it transit it. So ours are estimates or guesses or magic math. I've heard all sorts of just hilarious critiques.
It's just a serious reporting of exactly what's happening. Does that report also give you a breakdown of what is crude and what is oil product? It does. It does. I combine crude and oil products. We're also get reports on LNG and other products that are going out. I've confirmed my public disclosures to just oil and oil products. How much are you seeing the Middle East as the source of some of the increase that we've seen in diesel prices in the United States up some 30% over the past couple of months? Is that really coming from Middle East or as President Trump said yesterday? Is that really due to Ukrainian attacks on Russian facilities? So it's a combination of all of the above. And that is one of our focuses in the Middle East is to get more refined products out of the region. You'll see an upward trend on that. We are getting some and it's not trivial, but we want to see even more come out of the Middle East. But yeah, obviously there's been a huge disruption in Russian diesel exports. They were a meaningful exporter diesel today. They're not exporting any. Russia was a small exporter of gasoline.
Now they become a meaningful importer of gasoline. So refining is tight in the Middle East. It's tight in Russia. Heck, Gavin Newsom managed to close two significant refineries in California in the last 12 months. So those are just own goals from Democrat climate policies. They think somehow hobbling our energy system does something good for the world. It doesn't. President Trump is just dead set on putting the American people and the American economy first. And we'll focus on energy addition even during these crises. You'll see progress in that production and ultimately progress on prices. Secretary, right, how quickly could we see progress in prices? Given the fact that we've seen a pretty rapid rise and many analysts have come on this show and said they only see it going north going further up ahead of the election. Yes, well, obviously Iran has turned up their attempts to disrupt energy flows and they've got a lot of missiles and a lot of drones. So they have caused trouble in the short run. Certainly they've spread fear in the short run.
I'm pretty confident you will see increased flows of oil and oil products through the straight in the coming weeks and in the coming months regardless of what Iran does. And of course, we're working. We changed regulations for refiners in the U.S. to increase their throughput or pass the summer driving season. So we'll see a natural decline in demand and you'll see a rise in the throughput of American refineries. But we've got, you know, obviously we're fighting against headwinds in Russian refining sector, Chinese have held refining capacity off the market. I suspect we'll see some of that come back and we'll continue to get increased refined products out of the Middle East. Where does that confidence come from, Mr. Secretary, you said I'm confident then the next few weeks. Where does that confidence come from? That comes from talking to the U.S. military and how our operations are running there and to all of the exporters in the area and what their plans are as far as getting ships and products ready to go to come out. So you look at the last eight weeks we've had sort of a bumpy but steady increase in throughput.
My suspicion is and from what I hear we'll see an even more rapid increase in throughput in the next two months than we saw in the last two months. So that's directly from the exporters on the ground. But at the same time, Gulf partners were set to meet with the Iranians to try to open up a waterway and that meeting has been shelved. The rhetoric coming out of the region is actually not looking optimistic at all. So those are two different pathways. There's the pathway of Iran deciding they want to end being the world terrorists and they want to give life opportunities for their 90 million citizens. I don't know how to handicap that one. That's what you're reporting on there. What we're doing is using the U.S. joint force in collaboration with all our allies in the region to get flows to increase no matter what Iran does. So two different pathways. President Trump prefers the peace approach but we've got the military assets to drive flows even without peace. Hopefully all this brings Iran to the table. They don't have a card anymore. Maybe it's better to give up the ghost. Secretary Wright, the president promised lower gas prices.
He promised oil would be flowing. We have gasoline north of $4.30. Diesel north of $6.00. At the same time, the current amount that we have of crude left in the SPR is basically above the mandatory baseline at these levels. When can you start refilling our strategic petroleum reserve? Oh, it'll start being refilled in the next few months. Remember the oil we released, none of it was sold. It was all swapped with delivery dates and delivery amounts agreed in those contracts. So that oil will start going in. The oil problem is going to fade away. The bigger problem is the refined products. It's turning oil into gasoline, diesel, and jeff oil. At President Trump, you saw last year amazingly low inflation adjusted prices for gasoline, diesel, for home heating from natural gas. So I think President Trump has delivered on his agenda to increase American energy flows. But of course, he also thought I'm not going to kick the can down the road and deliver a nuclear-powered Iran to whoever President Trump's successor is.
So yes, he took bold leadership there. I think the rest of the world is waking up to the fact that, oh my gosh, this is Iran without nuclear weapons. Imagine a nuclear-armed Iran. His leadership there does cause short-term disruptions. But this is a far bigger question. Imagine long-term energy prices where you have this regime in power in Iran and they're nuclear-armed. That's unacceptable. This is the Bloomberg's events podcast, Bringing You, the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics. You can watch the show live on Bloomberg TV, weekday mornings from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple. Spotify or anywhere else you listen. And as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. And how fast a team can scale. To stay ahead, you need the tools to give you a competitive advantage. Built for this new era. Welcome to a Genteg Revenue. Adio is the CRM for this world. It meets you where you work. Compounds every customer signal into context. Then acts on it across your pipeline to let you move it on match speed and scale. With agents and animations for every job in Revenue, Adio orchestrates your work around the clock.
Built to handle the scale of your workloads, extensible with API. And MCP. And with the infrastructure to keep up with your most ambitious agents. Loved by high-growth startups like Granola, Modal, and Edge. Adio runs the work behind every win. That's Adio, the agentic CRM, the intelligent system that never sleeps. Fix up leads at 2 a.m. Catches renewals before they slip. Hands you the answer before you ask. Try Adio free at adio.com slash iHeart. That's adio.com slash iHeart. One of the most extraordinary on-screen bond you'll ever see.
This is Jacob Goldstein from What's Your Problem. Running a business is hard enough. Don't make it harder with a dozen apps that don't talk to each other. One for sales, another for inventory, a separate one for accounting. That's software overload. ODO is the all-in-one platform that replaces them all. CRM, accounting, inventory, e-commerce, HR, fully integrated, easy to use, and built to grow with your business. Thousands have already made the switch. Why not you? Try ODO for free at oduo.com. That's oduo.com.
More episodes
More from Bloomberg Surveillance

The Shifting AI and Energy Trades
Bloomberg Surveillance

Energy Driven Inflation Risks, Mounting US Debt & The Case Against Cutting Socia...
Bloomberg Surveillance

Bloomberg Surveillance TV: September 11th, 2026
Bloomberg Surveillance

CPI and National Security since 9/11
Bloomberg Surveillance