Best of 2021: Are We Getting COVID Testing All Wrong?
About this episode
This episode originally aired in September.
In the U.S., the PCR test is the gold standard for COVID testing. Common knowledge would have it that the test is more accurate—and therefore more effective at containing the spread of the disease—than the rapid antigen test.
What if that isn’t quite true?
Guest: Michael Mina, assistant professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Host: Lizzie O’Leary
Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Meta Settled. Is it a "Reckoning?"
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
A.I. Enshittifies Everything (Still)
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Can the Midterms Withstand Prediction Markets?
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future
Are Flock Cameras Watching You?
What Next: TBD | Tech, power, and the future