
Audio long read: So you got a null result. Will anyone publish it?
About this episode
The 'file-drawer problem', where findings with null or negative results gather dust and are left unpublished, is well known in science. There has been an overriding perception that studies with positive or significant findings are more important, but this bias can have real-world implications, skewing perceptions of drug efficacies, for example.
Multiple efforts to get negative results published have been put forward or attempted, with some researchers saying that the incentive structures in academia, and the ‘publish or perish’ culture, need to be overturned in order to end this bias.
This is an audio version of our Feature: So you got a null result. Will anyone publish it?
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Nature Podcast publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Nature Podcast

Audio long read: Could mending damaged DNA prolong life?
Nature Podcast

Briefing Chat: How Dolly Parton left her mark on science
Nature Podcast

Highest-ever ocean temperatures recorded as El Niño intensifies
Nature Podcast

Briefing Chat: New narcolepsy drug could unlock host of novel brain therapies
Nature Podcast