About this episode
John is joined by Darius J. Khambata, SC, a barrister in the Mumbai office of One Essex Court. They discuss the civil justice system in India, including the absence of a standing requirement to bring public interest litigation, the burden on the judiciary of handling millions of cases, and the emphasis on oral argument rather than written submissions. They also discuss how, for many cases, the decision on interim relief is effectively determinative, how arbitration is becoming increasingly prevalent, and the prospect that technology and a new influx of highly skilled young lawyers may dramatically improve the efficiency of the Indian civil justice system.
Podcast Link: Law-disrupted.fm
Host: John B. Quinn
Producer: Alexis Hyde
Music and Editing by: Alexander Rossi
Get every episode summarized
Each time Law, disrupted publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Law, disrupted
Law, disrupted Mailbag: The Future of AI in Litigation, International Legal Prac...
Law, disrupted
Law, disrupted Mailbag: Litigation Philosophy and the AI Revolution
Law, disrupted
Perplexity Wins Landmark Victory Against Amazon at Intersection of Agentic AI an...
Law, disrupted
Re-release: From Provo to NEOM: A Lawyer’s Career in Higher Education
Law, disrupted