Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentMar 20, 202623:02

Ali Bahreini, Iran’s UN Ambassador: No surrender

The Interview

About this episode

“Donald Trump was indicating that they will attack Iran for a few days and then the system will collapse, and then they will repeat what they have done in Venezuela. And everything went into a different direction. The Iranian nation is not a nation to surrender.” Evan Davis speaks to Ali Bahreini, Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations, about the ongoing war. He talks about Iran’s nuclear negotiations, how it says the war is unfolding, and why it believes their strikes on neighbouring countries are justified. Bahreini has represented the Islamic Republic of Iran in international diplomacy since 1999. He is now speaking at a time of heightened regional and global tension, following a wave of strikes by the United States and Israel, and Iran’s retaliatory attacks across the Middle East. Despite senior Iranian figures being killed, Bahreini insists Iran remains defiant and will never surrender. Thank you to the PM team for its help in making this programme. The Interview brings you conversations with people shaping our world, from all over the world. The best interviews from the BBC, including episodes with Polish President Karol Nawrocki and Antonio Guterres, UN Secretary General. You can listen on the BBC World Service on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays at 0800 GMT. Or you can listen to The Interview as a podcast, out three times a week on BBC Sounds or wherever you get your podcasts. Presenter: Evan Davis Producers: Guy Emanuel, Caleb Darwin, Lucy Shepperd, Osman Iqbal Editor: Justine Lang and Damon Rose Get in touch with us on email [email protected] and use the hashtag #TheInterviewBBC on social media.

(Image: Ali Bahreini Photo by SALVATORE DI NOLFI/EPA/Shutterstock (16721914l)

Get every episode summarized

Each time The Interview publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

225 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Ali Bahreini, Iran’s UN Ambassador: No surrender

The Interview

0:00
23:02

Full transcript

The InterviewAli Bahreini, Iran’s UN Ambassador: No surrender. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

This BBC podcast is supported by ads outside the UK. The best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong people, so when you want to reach the right professionals, use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over one billion professionals, including 130 million decision makers, and that's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company, role, seniority, skills, company revenue, so you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. It's why LinkedIn ads generate the highest B2B return on ad spend of major ad networks. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash broadcast. That's LinkedIn.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply. Is Venezuela Donald Trump's model for regime change? Is Venezuela's ousted president Nicholas Maduro prepares to go to court in New York this week were inside his home country exploring how well Donald Trump's plans are going

for Venezuelans and for the US. Listen to the global story on bbc.com or wherever you get your podcasts. Hello, I'm Evan Davis, BBC presenter, and this is The Interview from the BBC World Service. The best conversations coming out of the BBC. People shaping our world from all over the world. If you're not a little bit afraid, then you're not paying attention. You have never seen a people so united. Do not make that boat crossing. Do not make that journey. Being born in America, feeling American, having people treat me like I'm not. We're more popular than populism. For this interview, I spoke to Ali Bahraini. Iran's ambassador to the United Nations. He's been conducting diplomacy for the Islamic Republic of Iran since 1999 under the hard line leadership of Ayatollah Ali Hamine.

The supreme leader was killed on the first day of the war by the US and Israel and to son Mosh Taba has been appointed his successor. This interview was recorded before the death of the Iranian security chief, Ali Larajani. You're going to hear Iran's defence of negotiations over its nuclear capabilities, how it says the war is unfolding, and why Iran believes striking its neighbours can be justified. This is a message that we have given to our neighboring countries that we don't fight against them. We don't have any war against those countries. We are friends. We belong to the same family. In fact, we appreciate the role they have played before the start of war. To give contribution to the diplomatic process. But unfortunately, we have quite evidences that the bases located in their countries are operational against our country.

Many military operations which are carried out by the United States are carried out by from those bases. And we expect our neighboring countries to understand the fact that we cannot seat and watch our country being attacked from those bases and do not have any reaction. Of course, we are expected to exercise our right to self-defense by taking appropriate measures against those bases. Welcome to the interview from the BBC World Service with Ali Bahraini. The election of St Mustafa Khamani as the leader is the indication of both stability and continuity in our country. And the fact that our country has been able to elect a new leader in this time of war, and the time that our country is under attacks,

signals the stability in our country and the fact that the political system is working very efficiently. And secondly, I think if you look at his message, you can understand the principle of continuity. And it seems that he is going to advocate and follow the main principles and guidelines that has been advocated and followed by his father. Everybody now in the country is happy with what has been done, particularly with not letting the position of leadership to be empty for a long time. And everybody is very confident in the ability and wisdom of the new leaders. And you say the whole country is glad about the continuity and the

speed of the decision to get the leadership situation clear. I mean, we hear from many people, some leaving Iran, people in Iran, Iran, Iranians outside of Iran, many have been hoping that this would be a moment when the Iranian regime would fall. They're not necessarily welcoming American in Israeli bombs, maybe not, but they are nevertheless not delighted by the regime. I wonder if people wanted to resist the regime, come onto the streets and say we don't want this new supreme leader. We don't like him. Would that be allowed at this point? Of course, there is divergence of views in our country like any other country, but the democratic system is telling us that the decision of democratic institutions should be respected. The election of new leader has been conducted through

a democratic process. It has been made by the assembly of experts who are the representatives of the people and the reaction in our country, the feedback has been quite positive. If you look at the presence of Iranian people in these streets nowadays, you can see that they have supported the decision, and there are very positive sentiments for this decision. What of the major miscalculations which was made by Donald Trump and his ally Ben Yamin Netanyahu was that, okay, they will attack Iran, and then there would be a kind of collapse in the Iranian political system, and the things will change in the way they wish. But the reaction shown by our people

was quite opposite. The people came into the streets from the very beginning after the attack, and they expressed their support to the government. In millions, they came into the streets in order to express their support. There is a different point of view as well, which is that the reason why people come out and support the regime is there are many supporters, and that's be quite clear about that. There are many supporters, but there are many people who oppose the regime, and it's difficult for them to come out on the same terms, because there isn't freedom of expression, and there isn't freedom of protest, and some very serious consequences in thousands of deaths have been felt by those who have protested against the regime. And that, that, that obviously is a very major major factor, as to what is going on. So I just come back to, if people don't like the regime, are they allowed to protest at the moment in Iran? Any person, any individual, or any group

who has anything to say in our society, he is allowed to express itself very peacefully with the condition that they make their demonstration, assembly, and expression in peaceful manner. It is our government who has got the responsibility of protecting people, those who want to express themselves, they are not only they are allowed, they are protected. Can we talk about Iran's tactics in this war? I'd like to focus on the bombing of your neighbors, the Gulf states, neighbors that have not necessarily allowed their bases, their American bases, they've got American bases, sure, hadn't allowed those bases to be used in the attack on Iran, and why you felt it was a good idea to bomb those countries, to strike those countries with drones and missiles. This is a message that we have given to our neighboring countries, that we don't

fight against them, we don't have any war against those countries, we are friends, we belong to the same family. In fact, we appreciate the role they have played before the start of war, to give contribution to the diplomatic process, all of them were involving and they were trying to have contribution. But unfortunately, we have quite evidences that the bases located in their countries are operational against our country. Many military operations which are carried out by United States are carried out by from those bases. For example, the attack which was made against one school in the city of Minab and resulted in the massacre of more than 160 students had been carried out from the US bases in our region. There are many evidences which shows that

those bases are operational against our security, against our country. And we expect our neighboring countries to understand the fact that we cannot seat and watch our country being attacked from those bases and do not have any reaction. Of course, we are expected to exercise our right to self-defense by taking appropriate measures against those bases. But a man had been serving as an arbitrator, a country that was trying to stop this war happening. Are you saying that a man's bases, American base in Iran, had been used to attack Iran and that that makes it fair and legitimate for Iran to attack a man? There is no verified information indicating that Iran has attacked a man and we are very suspicious about maybe some other agents have

conducted that attack against Iran. But that's useful to hear. It has been said to our Iranian friends and brothers that we do not target any plays in a man because a man is not part of the, or part of the sword against Iran. The best B2B marketing gets wasted on the wrong people. So when you want to reach the right professionals, use LinkedIn ads. LinkedIn has grown to a network of over one billion professionals, including 130 million decision makers. And that's where it stands apart from other ad buys. You can target your buyers by job title, industry, company, role, seniority, skills, company revenue. So you can stop wasting budget on the wrong audience. It's why LinkedIn ads generates the highest B2B return on ad spend of major ad networks. Spend $250 on your first campaign on LinkedIn ads and get $250 credit for the next one. Just go to LinkedIn.com slash broadcast. That's LinkedIn.com slash broadcast. Terms and conditions apply.

As Venezuela's ousted president Nicholas Maduro prepares to go to court in New York this week, were inside his home country exploring how well Donald Trump's plans are going for Venezuelans and for the US. Listen to the global story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts. You're listening to the interview from the BBC World Service. I spoke to Ali Bahraini last week. Now it's been surprisingly rare to hear official voices from Iran during this war. And so I appreciate having a decent amount of time to talk to Ambassador Bahraini. But it does create a dilemma. It's difficult to know how far simply to put questions and listen to the answers in order to understand what the Iranian position is, which we don't often hear, or how far to challenge some of those answers. In the end, I went for a bit of both. Let's return to my conversation with Ali Bahraini. You have sent pretty well as many weapons that the United Arab

Emirates do by Abu Dhabi as you have against Israel. It's perplexing from afar to see Iran attacking the United Arab Emirates. And then saying we want to be your friends and we want to reach out and be good neighbors. Yes, we want to be good neighbors. But we expect our neighboring countries not to provide any facility or any space to the United States to attack our country. What we are doing is not to attack the United Arab Emirates or any other country in our region. We are exclusively attacking those bases which are used by the United States Army to attack our country. And the friendship among our neighborhood in our neighborhood is a principle

which we follow it. We advocate it. We like it. But we expect our neighboring countries not to make any facilitation for the Army of the United States to attack our country. That is a principle which should be acceptable for the peaceful coexistence in our region. And just to be clear, when you hit civilian targets in Dubai, a hotel for example, or the airport, the main airport, that is just an accidental strike by Iran because you're only aiming at the actual bases, the American bases. So you're not intending any attack on civilian targets in Dubai. No, our military forces have been instructed and they are very careful about this instruction, not to attack any non-military location or place, not to make any harm to civilians. And they

have been very careful about this. But sometimes the Australian tactics of our enemy, United States is changing. Sometimes they are using their official bases in those countries in order to attack our country. And sometimes they are using some other places which are not seemingly, they are not recognized as military bases, but they are used for military purposes. And I think it is the United States which should be blamed for making such a huge problem for our neighboring countries because for us it is a matter of defense, it is a matter of self-defense. And we should make sure that there would be no any attack against us from those bases. And unfortunately the United States military forces are using not only those official bases but also some other places

in those countries in order to make operations against us. And we expect our neighboring countries to stop them from doing these malicious policies. Can I ask if Russia is giving much help to Iran in this war? Iran and Russia have closed the relationship. We have supported each other in many, on many issues. But to tell you the fact, Iran has never outsourced its security. Iran has always tried to be independent with regard to its military capabilities. Iran has prepared itself for such a scenario, for such a situation because our assessment, we are telling us that the possibility of war is very high and we have prepared

ourselves for this situation. How long do you think Iran can last? How long before Iran runs out of ballistic missiles, runs out of drones? How long can Iran tolerate this war? Iran is defending itself and this defense will continue to the point that the aggressors are stopped. For us, the end of war is when the aggressors are stopping the war. Iran did not start this war and it was the United States and Israel who started this war. If you look at this statement made by Donald Trump on the first day of war, then you can measure the level of success for the United States and level of victory and success for us. Donald Trump was indicating that they will attack Iran for a few days and then the system will collapse and then they will

repeat what they have done in Venezuela and everything went into a different direction. We measure our success and victory with how we have defended our country because we have been able to attack Israel, to have serious attacks against Israel despite of the heavy problems in the flow of information but different evidences and footages are showing that how Iranian attacks have been efficient against Israel. Iran has not allowed them to have any invasion from the land. That is something that they were planning at the beginning but they very quickly realized that it is impossible and they failed in that regard. And one more important thing is

the solidarity of Iranians. It is a strong message in the United States to Israel that Iranian nation is not a nation to surrender. Coming back to your question, Iran will defend itself to the point that the aggression is stopped. I want to just talk about that tragedy. It appears to have been an American accidental strike on the first day of the war against a gold school elementary school in Minab. You referred to it and most people who have looked at this do you think it was the Americans who struck that school? Can I ask you whether it was a coincidence that the IRGC base and military base was right next door to an elementary school? It was clear that the Americans were aiming at the base but hit the school. I do not want and I expect nobody to to give any kind of justification to the crime which has been committed by the United States.

According to the latest information, this has been a deliberate attack against that school. And I think what everybody should do is to condemn the United States, particularly now that everything is clear for everybody. Donald Trump was trying to fabricate some lies attributing these two Iran, but now everybody knows and it is clear that it has been made by United States forces. And I think that there is no difference to commit a crime, such a big crime, even if it is accidentally those who have attacked those who have ordered should be held accountable. We don't believe it has been accidental because it is against what they are claiming because United States is claiming that they are very precise. How can it be accidental? It cannot be

accidental. It has been a precise attack against a well-known school. And they know any excuse can be acceptable to attack a school of children and to commit such a massacre which is a clear example of the war crime. And I'm sure that United States will pay a very big price for that crime. And one last question, Ambassador, if I might, is when you look at the events of the last two weeks, do you think it may have been better for Iran to make more concessions in the talks that we're occurring with the United States before this war? Your country's position is we didn't want nuclear weapons, but we did want to enrich uranium and to enrich it above levels that might be

needed for civil power. Why not just concede more and have kept your country safe? Do you ever look back at what happened and think we should have just given away more in the negotiations to save this country going through what it's going through? The fact that the war has taken place does not give any argument for those who have attacked us. I think Iran was enough constructive, enough creative Iran came with the specific initiative to the negotiations. The assessment made by Omani foreign minister was quite positive and he was a genuine assessment about the negotiations. He believed that agreement is within our reach. All those assessments were based on realistic criteria, realistic parts of the negotiations. I think Iran was very constructive.

Iran showed good faith in the negotiations. You know it was at the time that we had one very bad experience before in June, at the time that when we were negotiating, we were attacked. But despite of that fact, in order to show our good faith, in order to show our constructiveness, Iran accepted to engage in a new round of negotiations. But again, they attacked Iran. Thank you for listening to the interview. You'll find more in-depth conversations on the interview wherever you get your BBC podcasts, including episodes with Iranian author Azir Nafici, or UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Plus, many others. Until the next time, bye for now.

Is Venezuela Donald Trump's model for regime change? Is Venezuela's ousted president Nicholas Maduro prepares to go to court in New York this week where, inside his home country, exploring how well Donald Trump's plans are going for Venezuelans and for the US. Listen to the global story on BBC.com or wherever you get your podcasts.

More episodes

More from The Interview

View all episodes →