Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 19, 20261:35

Adams Defends Himself in Bombings Lawsuit

About this episode

Gerry Adams, former IRA leader, defends himself against bombing victims claims in Londons High Court. Adams denies involvement, accuses victims of seeking a broader historical probe. Witness statements from British intelligence officers support victims case. Trial concludes tomorrow.

Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.

Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]

This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].

View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/324c5ea5559136f7

Get every episode summarized

Each time UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

11 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Adams Defends Himself in Bombings Lawsuit

UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

0:00
1:35

Full transcript

UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!Adams Defends Himself in Bombings Lawsuit. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

On March 19, Jerry Adams appeared in London's High Court this week to defend himself against claims from three men injured in IRA bombings decades. Ago. The victims include John Clark from the 1973 Old Bailey attack and Jonathan Ganesh and Barry Lackock from 1996. Blast in London Docklands and Manchester's Arndale Center. They accused Adams of being a top provisional IRA leader, including on its army council, at the time, and want just one pound in damages each. Adams told the court he had no role in the bombings and was never an IRA member. He came to reject the accusations head on and to defend the Irish Republican struggle for freedom. He also expressed respect for all conflict victims, noting that the violence has finally stopped thanks to peace efforts. The men's lawyers explain why they waited so long to sue, citing unawareness of their rights, costs, health issues, and fears of retaliation. Adams's team called the Lays Extreme, especially Clark's 50-year gap, and argued the case is really a bid for a broad historical pro-brother.

Then focus claims. They wanted thrown out as an abuse of the system. Witness statements from British intelligence officers bolster the victim's side. Once said Adams couldn't have risen politically without army council ties, right up to the 1996 Canary Wharf bomb. Another noted government's treated him as a senior IRA figure on the path to the Good Friday Agreement. The trial before Mr. Justice Swift wraps up tomorrow, with both sides pushing hard on evidence and fairness as the judge weighs the claims.

More episodes

More from UK News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

View all episodes →