About this episode
In today’s podcast, David and Sarah talk about the recent Supreme Court term and how Trump’s justices have changed the ideological makeup of the court. After some SCOTUSBlog stats analysis, Sarah explains how she would categorize the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence this year, and why a lot of commentators are leaving out part of the story when they discuss the justices’ ideological leanings. Plus, a dive into an anti-critical race theory lawsuit out of Evanston, Illinois, where elementary school students have been getting simplistic and controversial “anti-whiteness” training.
Show Notes:
-SCOTUSBlog statistics
-Deemar v. Evanston/Skokie School District 65
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Get every episode summarized
Each time Advisory Opinions publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Advisory Opinions
Justice Alito Stays Ruling on Abortion Pill by Mail
Advisory Opinions
May 5, 20261:18:59pending
Gutting the Voting Rights Act | Interview: Judge Roy K. Altman
Advisory Opinions
Apr 30, 20261:24:21pending
Arguing In Front of SCOTUS | Interview: Lisa Blatt
Advisory Opinions
Apr 28, 20261:15:07pending
Overturning Religious Precedent
Advisory Opinions
Apr 23, 20261:28:11pending