Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentApr 15, 20241:38:38pending

[23-108] Snyder v. United States

About this episode

Snyder v. United States

Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Apr 15, 2024.

Petitioner: James E. Snyder.
Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

  • Lisa S. Blatt (for the Petitioner)
  • Colleen E. Roh Sinzdak (for the Respondent)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

James Snyder formerly served as mayor of Portage, Indiana. He was convicted of federal funds bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) for soliciting and accepting $13,000 in connection with the city’s purchases of garbage trucks, among other federal crimes.

Before, during, and after trial, Snyder argued that the evidence did not support a finding that there was an agreement to exchange money for the truck contracts before they were awarded. Without a prior quid pro quo agreement, he argued, § 666 cannot apply. Interpreting the plain language of the statute and Sixth Circuit precedent, the district court rejected his interpretation of that provision. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed.

Question

Does 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(B) criminalize gratuities, i.e., payments in recognition of actions a state or local official has already taken or committed to take, without any quid pro quo agreement to take those actions?

Get every episode summarized

Each time Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

[23-108] Snyder v. United States

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

0:00
1:38:38

More episodes

More from Supreme Court Oral Arguments

View all episodes →