Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentNov 27, 20231:24:49pending

[22-6389] Brown v. United States

About this episode

Brown v. United States

Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Nov 27, 2023.

Petitioner: Justin Rashaad Brown.
Respondent: United States of America.

Advocates:

  • Jeffrey T. Green (for the Petitioner Justin Rashaad Brown)
  • Andrew L. Adler (for the Petitioner Eugene Jackson)
  • Austin L. Raynor (for the Respondent)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

Justin Rashaad Brown was indicted in York County, Pennsylvania, for multiple counts, including being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Brown pleaded guilty to one charge of drug possession and distribution as well as the § 922(g) offense. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania sentenced him to concurrent terms of 180 months’ imprisonment due to prior convictions triggering the fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence prescribed in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Brown appealed his enhanced sentence, arguing that his prior state marijuana convictions should not serve as predicates under the ACCA because those crimes are no longer a categorical match to their federal counterpart. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed.

Question

Does the "serious drug offense" definition in the Armed Career Criminal Act incorporate the federal drug schedules that were in effect at the time of the federal firearm offense?

Get every episode summarized

Each time Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

[22-6389] Brown v. United States

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

0:00
1:24:49

More episodes

More from Supreme Court Oral Arguments

View all episodes →