Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
governmentOct 4, 20231:24:41pending

[22-429] Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

About this episode

Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Oct 4, 2023.

Petitioner: Acheson Hotels, LLC.
Respondent: Deborah Laufer.

Advocates:

  • Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner)
  • Erica L. Ross (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting neither party)
  • Kelsi B. Corkran (for the Respondent)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

Deborah Laufer, a prolific litigant with physical disabilities and vision impairments, sued Acheson Hotels for failing to publish information about their accessibility on their website, which is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The district court dismissed the lawsuit, finding that Laufer lacked standing to sue because had no plans to visit the hotel and thus suffered no injury as a result of the lack of information on the website. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit reversed, concluding that Laufer’s lack of intent to book a room at the hotel operated by Acheson does not negate the fact of injury.

Question

Does an ADA “tester” have Article III standing to challenge a hotel’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she has no plans to visit the hotel?

Get every episode summarized

Each time Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

[22-429] Acheson Hotels, LLC v. Laufer

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

0:00
1:24:41

More episodes

More from Supreme Court Oral Arguments

View all episodes →