03-31-26 Part 1

0:00Yeah, we've been making it work, Tim's been contributing a lot, helping me find articles, helping me find videos and sources and stuff because it's very difficult to fill three hours a day, five days a week. But we love doing it, especially when we're both on here. We're able to have guests of the caliber we're going to have on today. Tell them a little bit about Simon Dixon. We've got joining us at the bottom of the next hour. So Simon is a, he's a great guy. We had a genius. He's a genius. We had him on the show. He is a one of the original people in Bitcoin, the people who've been pushing it. He's tried to start his own bank in England. Yes. He's got an extensive history. He used to be on Wall Street. He knows everything about the financial system and the, the industrial complexes that control behind the scenes. So he's like one of those insiders where you're going to get the best information because he's in rooms that the average person is not in. So I really love to have him on the show. I was like, hey, we got to make sure that enough people here. Well, this is a guy that tried to make the first

1:02new bank in England in like hundreds of years and was like was on the precipice of doing it and they tell you how the whole system works. And he's like, okay, I'm going into crypto. I'm going into these alternative modes of currency. And that's what he's really an expert on. Early early early Bitcoin adopter. I believe Max Kaiser and him are mutuals as well. That person has a long time affiliation with my father. So it's very cool. Very cool to have Simon Dixon here on the network. We've been trying to get him on for a little while. But you know, we're new at doing this. Things can be a little bit imperfect. But that's why we do it. We love the struggle. Yes, we do love the struggle. But again, phenomenal guess to have on you guys are going to really enjoy that at 9 a.m. Yeah, but let's get into the news here. We got Trump's latest tweet. And this is clip one. I want to just go ahead and third of this because we're not trying to just do the politics and war show. We got a lot of very information from y'all, but y'all want direct updates. This is the first news show on InfoWords in the morning. Let's go to clip one. How close are you getting that? Well, we have a coalition for them, but they should have been up here a long time ago. And you know, they're affected. The amazing thing is we don't need the

2:05hormones strength. We don't need it. We don't need it at all. We don't we have so much oil. Our country is not affected by this. We have more. All right, let's pause. We have twice. Okay, so he's saying, can we leave it up on the screen? We don't need it. He's saying you don't need it. We have all the oil you need. Just buy it from us. And the number two, build up some courage and just go take it. Go take the straight. Here's the thing. Patriots are in control. We've heard this. We've heard that the situation is under control. Does this sound under control? I mean, we've we've been saying that for a while. As soon as, you know, the missiles start flying over to the middle to these Gulf states. Don't worry, guys. It's under control. Don't panic. We know you have drones. Go get to these high rise. Don't panic. Don't worry. We'll take care of it. Oh, South Korea, Japan. We're going to need those missile defense systems. Yeah, by the way, we got to take into the middle least. Oh, the Gulf country is like, yes, is it for us, brother? Is it for us? No, no, no, it's not for you. It's for us and Israel. So like our allies, you're just like, okay, and they were like, you can buy the oil from us or you can just go take

3:09it yourselves. I mean, taking it themselves means making a deal with Iran. That's what that really means. That does. That's the that's the hidden message. Well, I mean, at this point, either do that or you go to Russia, right? Because Russia's rolling in the cash. I think they made $760 million within the last month or two just off of the loop. So I mean, I don't see how you just say, take it without force. So you're saying commit your troops, commit your ships, get into this conflict. If you want some oil, right? Like the Philippines right now, I think they were like 40 days before, before all of their oil reserves. It's like a national crisis. You know, go ahead, Philippines, go take your oil. That's all you need. Just go send some ships out there and it's like, yeah, and this is going to destroy the rest of the world. It's already started to do that. And just because we're insulated from that here, doesn't mean it's not going to affect us down the road. And here's the thing. A lot of people love America. A lot of people really still love America around the world. We're trying our damnedest to remove that. And that really sucks.

4:09It is. And it's that like playing both sides things where like people are like, well, we trust you, but then you like stab us in the back. Right. And that's the thing that the rest of the world is not going to cooperate with. And again, we're pushing most of our allies closer to our enemies doing these types of things. And we all know, you know, talk is cheap. Like people want to see actions and not just in America, but across the world. That's really what they want to say. No more looking into it. Like you looked into it enough. We got a war. Okay. So like it's time to go get on your bike. Well, you know, it's bad when the Pope starts speaking up to because I've never seen him say anything for these other conflicts. The Pope said, we don't have this article. Maybe we can pull it up, but it's not super important. The Pope said that the prayers of those who like commit wars or start wars go on an answer because they have blood on their hands. And he's American. Right. So I mean, it doesn't get any better than that folks. Like I mean, if an American Pope is going out there, the Pope is a sad loser. That's what you get.

5:10Right. But seriously, let's go ahead and get into clip two. And this is what's going on in Israel right now. This is just a brief little story. They've passed the death penalty if you are a Palestinian convicted of killing in Israeli, they'll automatically kill you. So let's watch them. Let's see how they celebrate this. They're saying they've got thousands of people already basically lined up that they are going to execute now that this has been passed. And if here's the thing, you know, you're in a public relations image battle. Why would you do something like this? Why would you now explain the scenario for for me and maybe some other people like, so what is this end up doing? Like they're

6:11celebrating. It's an it's an ethnicity specific law. So it would be like, okay, so like if a white man kills a white man trial jail, whatever, if a black man kills a white man, black man gets killed, you see it on sand. That's that's the type of fun, you know, secular liberal law that we have here. That makes sense to you. Yeah. It's pretty dark, right? It is pretty dark. But you know, you just see it. These people don't care. They're detached from reality. Yeah. So I mean, for them, if it doesn't affect them, they're like, well, who cares? Right. And it's also like we talk to our guests that we had on Nate Collins, also the ultra orthodox faction that all these people represent. And they also they don't have to serve in the military. Yeah. They get kickbacks. It's all of it. And it's just it's really truly a sickening faction. Yeah, we had an Israeli citizen on our show probably a couple of weeks ago. And he kind of runs us through kind of how Israel's structured. And it really is like Drex is talking. There's a ruling class. There's a ruling class. And the ruling class is like these ultra orthodox like super conservative religious

7:17sects and super rich, but they broke. Yeah. They're able to go or they don't have to pay taxes. They get what stipends or something like that. Pretty much the rest of the ban handle they beg for money. That's literally what he said. It would be like if all the people, homeless people in America were to be like the ruling class is how he this isn't my words. This is how he equated it to where they're going around begging and they're supposed to be superior to the average person who's worked. And we just take a look at that and people around the world are going to reject that and hate that. That's why we played that clip. Let's go ahead and go to clip three. And I wanted to have a robust discussion with you on this. Let's talk about it for the next 15 minutes or so. So we've got these robot security droids, these like spider dogs. And apparently it's like half the cost to employ them versus a traditional security company. Your homeless person in Atlanta, you get rolled up on by one of these. And dude, that's straight out of black mirror. Yeah, it's robots waving at you. A lot terrifying, bro. I hate this so much. Wow. That's capitalism now.

8:24Coming to a city near you. Seriously, hold citizen, hold citizen. Did you pay walking fee citizen? Like you'll you have to pay your carbon credit. Wait till they strap a gun on it. That's that. Yeah. Absolutely. That's when it becomes really scary. Yeah. And you're going to you're going to see that. I mean, we're going to see like this is a whole new era of like unprecedented stuff because this technology, yeah, we watched the Boston Dynamics robot like 15 years ago or whatever. This is now mass produced, mass accessible. They're going to be trying to put this in all sorts of various applications. What do you think about that? Yeah, they are. Okay. So as an engineer, as an engineer, I look at this two ways because I'm also in media, but I'm also behind the scenes in technology and I'm seeing advancements and things where it is useful for the applications. So it's very hard for me to look at these situations and paint it all black, right? There is a part of me that is afraid of, you know, not they're not being checks and balances to some of this stuff. Okay. To where it's like, how do you determine

9:28what's right from wrong and the AI has to determine that now that's based off of human input. But the part that I see specifically that is actually useful for the average person is when we talk about specific like repetitive motion stuff. And this is just technology that goes in like manufacturing. Now, you and I disagree sometimes on this about AI replacing jobs, those types of things. You can give your standpoint on that real quick before I kind of continue. Yeah, sure. I mean, it's just a building a grid where eventually they're not going to need as many people and then kind of everything we see as a consequence of that these resource wars, these deep population efforts like mass migration everywhere. It's really an effort to collapse human society because they want 500 million people and they want some sort of technological grid that they run. Now, I think technology is great. And if it's true power to the people, human supremacist view where everyone gets access to it equally, I think that would be awesome, but you look at these people talk about it and they're like, yeah, like we want intelligence to be sold basically on a meter like like electricity or water or something like that. And what that means

10:30is there's going to be someone with a million times the ability that you have. Okay, so yeah, and let me let me so let me clarify something. So technology is only good depending on how it's implemented and who's behind the implementation itself. Like a knife doesn't kill anybody. The person with the knife kills right. So you get to a scenario where I see they're being a light at the end of the tunnel. Here's the thing about manufacturing and some of the things like there have been a lot of job replacements across America, specifically in manufacturing. Right. And the thing is is when you look at a piece of technology, it takes away some of the ergonomics and the pain that happens when an operator has to do a task, a repetitive task specifically. So just a key example, not to interrupt you. You talked to me on the gray area of the show we do Thursday and Sunday at 730 to 1030 PM. You talked to me on the gray area about working at a specific job. I won't say exactly what it is, but this bag gets past in front of this very bright light. Yeah, okay, go into that. So that's a lot of it. Let me clarify because not not all jobs

11:34are good jobs for humans. There are certain things that like you would want a robot or something to take over that because it's actually doing harm to that person. So what he's talking about, there are bags and those bags, you have to screen them to make sure there's nothing inside of this particular matter inside of this bag. And there's a super bright white light. And there's bags moving across. And imagine sitting in that chair for eight hours of shift. You get like 30 minutes and you're sitting there staring at this bright light and you can't take your face off of looking at that. Otherwise, you're going to be in trouble. And that bag is, it's not just one bag. There's thousands of bags moving across your screen. Now you have vision systems that we're trying to implement to replace that person so that they can go do something else instead of having to sit there and be miserable. And that sounds great. That sounds great. Where the problem is, and this is where I agree with you, is what do we do when you get to a point where there's not enough jobs and there's more robots that have taken over those positions? Because that can happen

12:38in a scenario. Our problem is is we haven't come up with systems where we encourage humans to go do the things that they're supposed to do or some type of UBI, which again, everyone's going to call me socialist, but like we've got enough resources to be able to help people out. Humans were never designed to be sitting in a four by four square moving pieces over and over and over again repetitive motion. That's where the robot is supposed to step in. I don't want AI to take over people's creativity. We've got to give people an ability to even do something else. And that's also the problem here, right? Yeah, you know, I would agree it's a real double-edged sword type of scenario. And the thing is, it's going to take them 40 to 50 years to have a robot that can crawl under your house and do your plumbing. It's going to take them the same for like high tech, like electrician work, all these things. The real job loss that we're going to see that we're already starting to see, Tim, is the white collar. It's the white collar. It's the tech job. That's

13:39actually the biggest sector that's being affected because robotics haven't been able to mimic human motion quite yet. Yeah, that's the thing that the finger has like fingers have like three thousand joints or whatever, like in the hand, like access and mobility, the access and mobility of your 100% correct about that. So what you're seeing first is the white collar jobs. Specifically, you've got coders that are in in jeopardy. A lot of data analysis, a lot of people who are kind of doing clerk style work. We're now the AI can do that. Yeah, that is a real risk. And the problem is is they don't have every generation or let's say every few hundred years, we go through a transition like this, but this one is new industrial revolution when agriculture equipment was invented. There were a ton of farmers doing manual labor jobs. What ended up happening is you displaced and there was a lot of pain early on to say, well, what do I do if I don't know how to farm, where do I go right now? Right. So it took a transition period for that

14:42person to go from doing that and go into something like manufacturing where it's still required people. And the thing that's really crazy about the time we live in are these giant jumps like from Bronze Age to Iron Age to Steel Age to Industrial Revolution to contemporary like space stage where we're at today. It's just gotten shorter and shorter and shorter and shorter. Now everything we see coming out is compounding upon itself. It's like the saying is we stand on the shoulders of giants. That's true. Eventually, the real thing that we're all worried about with this technology is what happens when the knife has a will of its own. What happens? The thing decides it doesn't want to do the work of its masters anymore. No, and I totally get that perspective and let me clarify for everybody listening. I'm not pro like let's go and replace a bunch of people's jobs with robots. But I am being realistic because I'm in the forefront. I see people being replaced because they shouldn't be lifting 800 pound items and you've got a robot that's now doing that particular task. It's not really 800. I'm exaggerating. It's more like 80

15:46pounds, but it's still the same concepts. I'm not pro that. The problem is is we are getting into a transition to where you're going to see the jobs are being removed quicker than they can be replaced and moved into a different skill set. That's the problem. It's really dangerous to have much people unemployed and like getting into climbing economy already that's trying to replace them. I want to show a clip for because here's the thing. I don't think robot should imitate human form. I think that should be legal, but I'm not against applications like this. Let's go to clip four. This is real. Look at that. I mean, a firefighter is dangerous. No, 100% but look how cool this is. It is cool. I've been seeing these as well. And see with that, you get one less person. I say, I have the smoke exposure. You can get closer to the fire to the colds without getting burned. That's great. And I love that. This is a good application. That's as good as it can get you and I are on agreements on this one. The problem is, is do we have a lot of faith

16:50at the with the adults in the room, right? Right. To make the right decisions when it comes to rolling out this technology and giving people on our alternative. At this point, I don't trust anybody who's in these systems because they're showing how they're betraying the American people time after time after time after time. And when you rely on them to make a good decision in a vacuum where no one is there watching them, somehow these people are making the right. So the homeless guy is going to do my taxes. I trust him. That's basically what we have with the government. And when you look at our government at large, the main issue, you know, as a kid is like a as a young libertarian, okay? When I was a little boy, a little fan of Ron Paul and all that back in the day, okay? When I'm when I'm a young libertarian, I'm like, hey, you know, I'm losing my train of thought here when I'm a young libertarian, I'm like, okay, there should be less regulations. These companies should be able to do what they want. So we can have innovation and science and technology. What I realize now is there's two little regulation on the things that matter.

17:52And there's way too much regulation on the things that are totally irrelevant and just keep small business. Absolutely right. And one of the areas that we have to look at specifically is AI. AI regulation is severely behind the ball in terms of catching up with the technology. No, no, no regulation. That's what that's the law they passed literally. Yeah. And the AI companies have their own lobbies just like the military industrial complex. So they go in there. They're like, well, we want less regulations. That way we can make more money. Check it out. Right. Here's the thing about AI right now. You know what I think should be banned completely. You shouldn't be able to take a person that exists in real life and be able to clone that person on AI unless that person is the one doing the action or you have specific rights to yourself. Uh oh, you mean like if you come with a logo and you get a copyrighted, I can't steal that but I can steal your entire image. Yeah. Isn't that isn't that good? Well, it's a new way for scammers. Look, I think everybody understands right now.

18:54It's getting crazy scary to be able to tell the difference between what's real and what's not. You get a phone call and it sounds like somebody talking to you. It's not. I am a robot. You know, and this was one of those things where the technology was intended to be good. Right. And we have bad actors that are doing things with that. Remember, maybe you didn't see these, but it used to be on YouTube. They kind of cracked down on this. There used to be AI ads of like Joe Rogan pitching a product on Rumble. Oh, yeah. And I was like, wait, I fell for it for some like, wait, but that sounds weird. Now they're getting. Now they're getting. It is fraud. But now they're getting to the point where it's so good, guys, that you're not going to be able to tell with like 11 labs or some of these other technologies where they're cloning people's voices. It's almost like for like, yeah. And I had such a good one of my dad made on 11 labs like a year plus ago. And it's only just gotten so much better, so much better, so much better. Yep. This is the world we live in guys. It really is sci-fi. We're getting ushered into that age.

19:56There's no running from it. And the last thing I'll say on this is these AI models, they are trained to basically continue to evolve themselves at the same time with less and less human input. Right. So again, it's like that exponential curve and the compounding effect as the AI gets smarter. It knows how to fix its gaps. And the human doesn't have to step in. I mean, it's eventually going to get to AGI. We'll see how that happens. We say we're not that far, but we might be closer than we think. It's very human impulse to think of everything as linear and as like following like a constant gradient. But in reality, everything that we're talking about here is exponential, just like with the time development of the technology, the rapid advancements we've seen over the last century, over the last decade, really. But we have to speak about these things and people in positions of power, especially Congress, need to step up to the plate and do the job that we ask them to do and protect us along the way. Technology when it's guided in the

20:57right way and it's got the right barriers, the right protections can be a net positive for society or it can be a net negative when we have people who are corrupt just wanting to grab a bag and screw over the American person. That's the problem. And that's our, that's the systemic problem that is. Rest on this show, that's what we see in every sector and we rail against it. And it's our job to get involved in the political process, especially after Trump being gone, it's going to be a whole new world. So if you're passionate about A.I. regulation, a digital bill of rights going forward and having an actual future for humanity where we utilize these things instead of being used by them, where are the people you want to see? Rex Jones, 10 Dawkins. Yeah, man. And anybody who's dealing with any job lost due to AIS, we deeply sincerely feel free. We're sorry about that. I've had a lot of friends, a lot of people that have been dealing with this. You know, so let's go ahead and read this article. Yeah, sure. In the killing of Charlie Kirk, defense lawyers for Tyler Robinson claimed the bullet did not match the alleged rifle. They cite DNA complexities as well and incomplete forensic data while seeking delay,

22:02raising doubts over key prosecution evidence in a new for a new court filing on Tuesday, March 31st, defense attorneys for Tyler Robinson, the accused who allegedly killed conservative influencer Charlie Kirk have claimed that the Bureau of the ATF was unable to match the bullet recovered during the autopsy to the rifle allegedly used by Robinson, stating that the recovered weapon was a Mauser Model 98 30 yacht six caliber rifle. The defense lawyer stated that the ATF analyst could not conclusively identify the bullet fragment, so they didn't even have it. So the guy gets shot. There's no exit wound on camera. Blood doesn't spray out the back of his body. Lord forbid, God have mercy. Like it's just so horrible. We have talked about this so callously, but we're talking about a criminal case that's captivated the nation, a very prominent political assassination at the end of the day here. Yeah, and here's the thing. I think everybody knew there was something fishy going on behind the scenes, all the evidence, all the things, and my issue was specifically all types of narratives were coming out. You had deliberate, deliberate misinformation, misinformation, you know, and you know, I used to like old

23:06Candace, but the new Candace was doing things like Fort Wachuka Waka Haka. Fort Haka, yeah, and it's like she's talking about like secret meetings and, you know, maybe somebody popped out of a suit title like Ninja Turtle or Super Mario exploded and there's like a bomb in the lapel mic and stuff. And you told me when I was like, no, no, no, I'm going to watch all of Candace's episodes for this month so that I can know that I can say confidently that I know it's BS because people when I came out against the narrative on Twitter, but we did really people were like, you don't need to know what she's saying before you criticize. And I was like, well, okay, I listened to it. Mitch Snow is this guy who's involved in like border military operations. Like 30 years ago, he supposedly claims that he uncovered evidence that the military was working with the cartel, specifically a photo of some sort of military leader with a cartel member on some sort of tunnel around the border. He makes this claim that this hurt his military service somehow. He comes back like 30 years later to the day, to the base and 12 kernels and Erica Kirk and everyone's there. And my ex-wife had eyes like those I've never put those eyes. And it's just like,

24:13like we're not in a quentin 13th movie. Okay, like I'm sorry. Well, and the biggest problem is if you got people with big enough platforms coming out with stories, it takes away from the main narrative and the real stuff that's going on. Because we do question it in question. And that's the thing is like we don't buy the official narrative. We have the article right here. The official narrative is a lie, right? But that doesn't mean we believe in the Ninja Turtle. Yes. And then here's the thing. It doesn't take rocket science to see like things were not adding up. And specifically around the text messages. If you guys, yes, if you guys recall and let we'll get these in order too specifically, because Rex and I are going to read this out for you. You talk a little bit. I'll get it done. Basically, there were text messages that apparently came out between Tyler Robinson and his roommate. Now apparently they had this lovers, a quarrel. I think his roommate was transgender if I'm not mistaken. No, maybe a furry or something. And there were these text messages that came out. Now we're going to read some of these text messages. And we're going to see what you guys

25:14think about them because we're like, there's no way that this was a real exchange and we had some boomers. I think it starts here first with the September 10th. Yeah. And then we got the second one under we got delete this exchange. We got don't talk to the media please and then a bit over a week. We'll just read it like that. And it doesn't really matter if it gets a little jumbled. Well, so let's start here with drop. Yeah, for sure. So this is supposedly the conversation between the assassin and his lover. Okay. And this reads like it's scripted like it's written by like a middle-aged man pretending to be AI, some sort of Intel officer at the FBI or CIA, whatever it is. Drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. What? You're joking, right? I'm still a little came I love, but I'm stuck in Orm for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I got to grab my rifle still. To be honest, I'd hope to keep the secret till I die of old age. You're killing Charlie. Oh, it's going to be a secret until I die of old age that I climbed on a roof and I killed the most prominent person in conservative media. I just thought like this, this can't be real and also 20 year olds don't talk like this.

26:18No, no, no, it's okay. Where's the Riz? Where's the note cap? I slimed him out. I slimed him out would be a good one. They they they they missed that one. Yeah. All right, let's keep reading. Yeah, you weren't the one who killed it. Who who did it, right? I'm sorry. I thought they caught the person. Just let's read off. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, thank you. No, they grabbed some crazy old dude that interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from the drop point. Oh, the drop point of all these military times shortly after. But most of the side of town, it got locked down. It's quiet almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Why? Why did I do it? Yeah. I had enough of his hatred. Come on, man. Come on, bro. I had enough of his hatred. Some hatred. I just it's totally fake. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I would have left no evidence going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Okay, so hold on. He does the act. Then he puts

27:20his rifle in the bushes. Then he's coming back to get his rifle later. Why wouldn't you just leave? That's what I'm saying. And not even just that, right? Everybody who's watched like, you know, any crime TV show knows you don't leave a clear trail for law enforcement to be able to fight. I was here at this time. I'm hiding further from the cops. Go ahead, sir. I did this. This was the weapon. This was the bullet I use. This is my area code of where I live. I am the person who did it. That's pretty much what this is why I did it. This is my premeditated motivation for doing it. Well, and so like again, we can clearly definitively say when we saw these text messages, Rex and I as well as the rest of you guys were like, there's no way this story is true. And it's just beautiful, beautiful to see that they're still following through on this because I thought they were going to let this one go just like Trump's assassination attempt. Well, they're trying to, but ultimately, I mean, it just shows how massive Charlie Kirk was,

28:21and it is an influence just on the world in America in general. You can't really make this die just because there's so many hours of Charlie on tape recently talking about everything that's going on in the world right now. And the reason why people call all this into question is because Charlie was very passionately anti-war incredibly pro-Israel as well, but very passionately anti-war. And he made a lot of statements talking about the October 7th standdown, like we've talked about the Israeli citizen interview we did earlier, like we've heard about that from other people, like they're mad about that as well. And he had all these legitimate questions. Oh, he doesn't get to ask questions anymore. And he was speaking about out against Iran. He was speaking about foreign entanglement. And here's the thing, they knew Charlie was a threat. He galvanized the youth and just look at TPUSA, right? Right. The amount of offices that they had across the United States and the colleges that they were going to, that is a ton of influence. And when you can influence a young generation into a narrative which we support of the no new

29:24wars, the conflicts, those types of things, they see you as a threat. The industrial complex sees you as a threat for those things. Yeah, no, absolutely. And what you have with TPUSA is you have, I think they have a thousand campaign offices and many thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of affiliated volunteers or employees. You have a ready-made political campaigning system that is targeted towards young people that young people accept and love and view as legitimate. So you take the brain out of that and you do a brain transplant into it. That's pretty much the ideal scenario. So you can't look at the Charlie Kirk thing and go, well, there's absolutely no motive to take him out besides someone that's mad about him not liking trans people. Yes, there's tons of reasons why you would do so. And then remember before, I guess the night before he was assassinated, there were meetings that were going on. He was getting angry. You can correct me in from earlier on, earlier on, but it wasn't okay. A couple months before, there were other stuff happening in motion constantly and motion constantly. So you're right also. And there were people that were unhappy with what he was doing

30:24specifically and what he was speaking out against. Now, we don't know exactly who's behind this. I'm seeing people say, well, it could have been these rallies. It could have been some people who could have been easily private corporate interest as well. I mean, how many shows do we watch? I think it was like yellowstone or something or like be meeting the big tower. We're going to take the billion out of company over. But that's, that is real, right? But it doesn't happen at like a military base with 12 kernels in the wife and they plot the assassination attempt. These decisions are made quietly. Yeah. But one thing that I can't get behind and I've seen the scenario to come out so much is that Erica Kirk is behind the assassination attempt. Like come on. Like that, that one kind of rubbed me the wrong way because I'm like, she's married to this man has two kids and you can see their life prior to this. They were happily married. You could see them in love. Sure. I mean, people criticize her. She's acting a little weird. I say she's a widow. I'm not really going to try to attack that ship. I don't think it's worth it. You can just criticize things based on facts and evidence alone, right? And there's more than

31:27enough of that here. Here's the thing. You have people doing the Charlie Kirk show right now. The Charlie Kirk show with the same name talking about the Iran war and like a neutral deposit of context. Well, and what are you going to do? You're going to let his name die. You're going to let the whole operation die. Change the show. Change the name. If my dad died, it's not the Alex Jones show. Yeah. Well, here's what I'm thinking, right? Like I understand like some people like, well, she's grifting off of her husband's death and X, Y and Z here's the house to feed as well. That's what I was literally about to say. You can't criticize. She's got to be able to find a way to make money for her family because that was what Charlie was doing and she needs to step into the place as the head of the house now. Yeah. So it's not like she's just going to go back and and do a nine to five guys like she's got to find a new way. So of course, you know, she's having conversations and there's ways that they're going to do in order to continue and they have a ton of people on payroll, by the way. You got Druski up there. Oh, the Druski. What did you think about that? By the way, we haven't talked about that. So when he when he did the NASCAR thing, I genuinely didn't recognize him. I thought he was just like a fat white person with the beard. This is highly

32:30offensive, but hey, you know what? I've said that Kanye doing the Hitler thing is art. I can't call that not art as well. Yeah. I mean, the joke was funny, but I mean, again, it's who you pay. I'm a free speech absolutist. I can't be a hypocrite. If you're mad at me right now for saying that, like I just I can't hold two positions that are contrary to each other. Like I endorse Alex Stein crashing out. I have to endorse Druski crashing out. Those are the rules. And here's the thing. As a black person, a lot of black people are not going to appreciate me saying this. But again, I have to be ideologically consistent. Now, I'm not saying people need to go out and start doing this, but because he is doing light face, it does bring a case where like is black face? Okay. Like we can't just say one side is here's the thing. I'll give a little bit of a little argument. I would say because of the history. Yeah. That goes along with the black face. That makes it. It does. It does make a little bit different. And an all I'm just trying to tell you is like within a vacuum, I don't support. Why would I support this? I don't support people

33:32going on and doing black face. It is highly effective. But we do support free speech. Yes. Yes. And here's the thing. We can look at someone doing this and say this is disgusting whatever. But at the end of the day, it's a part of our society. And in a society where you can do that, it's a lot better than a cop showing up to your house with a gun because of, you know, what you did on social media. Yes. So I, I, I, I'm not participating in it, but I do endorse it as freedom. But we look, we look at the whole thing and just getting back to Eric or Kirk in general. You have someone like her and they essentially plug her in because she's the wife of Charlie Kirk. She's the only one that feasibly could have the street cred to run the operation and keep it as it is. But she's not running anything like she's controlled. Like there's, there's tons of people. There's tons of money. There's things that keep the operation afloat. There's everything that we don't see, right? So it's hard to make a value judgment based off of that. I want to go to the clip number five because you, you've talked to me a lot about the space age weaponry and stuff like that. Have you heard about the discombobulator? No, discombobulated. Now we're getting so like fantasy. So there, there were rumors that we use

34:34the so-called discombobulator on the Venezuelans. They're like special forces came in, there was a report. It looked like it had been written by the CIA, but they couldn't find a better name. I like it. It has a lot of words. Discombobulator. Yeah. But let's go ahead and roll the clip. What have you heard about the discombobulator? Because I hadn't heard anything than that much detail since Alprin said it made everybody yak. You know, there's a lot of directed energy weapons that we've had for a while and we've tested them. There's some that can make you feel heat. You know, there's sound waves that can make you just freak out and discombobulate you. What exactly they're using and what was used in Venezuela has not been publicly announced. It's just one of those things that we have that makes it a big advantage because when you are going into a place where the enemy knows where you're coming, you don't want to lead with your face. You know, that's a cardinal rule of doorkicking operations. Have something in front of you for that. So that's why you throw flashbangs in a room.

35:38This is a directed energy flashbang to blow everybody's mind and hopefully get our guys in and safely back out. Yeah, I learned that in boxing. They couldn't, I'm saying like they couldn't find a better name than discombobulator. Well, I like that Fox News is just like it's you're like a boomer and like Galveston, Texas and you turn on the TV and it's just Jesse Waters and this guy talking about discombobulators. It's just like explosion footage was throwing strike footage over and over and over again. You're like, oh, that's a big one. That's a good one. They love their war footage. That's what they do for the Fox News Fox News, man. It's it's become a parody of itself. Well, and just what a time to be alive that we have discombobulators and only farms and just all types of new stuff. And I'm like, how do I take these things serious anymore? Like, so the whole point of that technology, it's basically like almost like a flashbang is the way that like you ever heard like Havana syndrome. No, we're like it's like this pseudo thing, but apparently it may be real where like you get like waves and at you and it like makes you sick,

36:41the lyrics. Okay, I start like that. So yeah, like I read about these weapons like 20 years ago in books that guests would give me here on the show and they've had things like this forever. A lot of these things that go have like a big panel on a truck and then they direct the panel at the crowd of people, a lot of crowd control. There's like minor and major versions of different frequencies that you can use. Sounds pretty fun, right? Do you think we just like the people creating weapons that like Lockheed and Raytheon are just like watching movies and they're like, that's a good idea. I have an idea. I mean, that's probably how it works, right? Like as an engineer, you see a system like, yeah, maybe there's a good concept there and maybe we could engineer something like that similar to happen. I mean, I think back to G.I. Joe, I've always thought that this was terrifying, but a really cool idea of the rods from God, the tungsten rods, right? You can drop in from space and do the kinetic damage without having to fall out of a nuclear weapon. Wow, I bet you they come out with something like that. Oh, I think we already have stuff like that up there in orbit. It's pretty terrifying to think about. Let's talk about who I'm seeing.

37:42Massie on life to say, yes, let's talk about that. Life is a clip. One of the things in the Farm Bill, still trying to get out of it, was successful in getting this out of prior bills is immunity for a German company called Bayer that makes glyphosate. This is not to grant farmers immunity. This is to grant the corporation immunity. If they give farmers, if farmers contract a form of cancer or non-hodged insulin phoma from this chemical, if this makes it into the Farm Bill, it won't be able, you won't be able to sue for that. And I know they're dealing with some similar legislation at the state level. You know, I learned a lot about this from you because I had no idea that this was an issue. And maybe you can just recap like why glyphosate is so dangerous for us. Sure. And I'll go ahead and start doing that by giving one of the counter arguments. People will go, it's only used on 3% of the wheat to dry it, bro. Actually, that's not true.

38:43It's used on a third of all American fields for wheat control. We used to use about 100 million or 80 million pounds of it. We now use 280 million pounds of it a year. It's ubiquitous in the food supply. 95 to 97% of all corn is roundup ready. That means it's made to take the pest aside while everything else dies. Spoiler alert that gets into your body as well. Glyphosate is so dangerous because it's an amino acid analog of the amino acid called glycine, which is used to make all the collagen in your body. So there's been a prevalent health theory. And this has kind of come out over time that it has a potential to replace that positive amino acid, which is essential for you to have in your body over time, leading to salsa and essence and eventually possibly speculating cancer. I mean, not even speculating RFK junior went to court against Monsanto and won a $270 million lawsuit proving it caused non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. That means it's carcinogenic. And if it's carcinogenic causes one cancer, it causes all the other ones as well. Wow. Wow. And I'm just thinking about it because I'm seeing a lot of people

39:46even in our age group and young 30s starting the cancer rates are spiking. And it's specifically because of what we're putting in our bodies. Like I had a friend just last year. She's like younger than me. And she had like cancer in her neck. I'm like, what? Like how are we getting to that point? Now I thought, you know, RFK was supposed to come in and he was supposed to like open the cabinet up and just start tearing out all the bad news for national security. Go ahead. So what do you think happened because I was super excited. The reason this is one of the reasons why I ran on Trump because he was bringing in RFK and I loved what he was saying. He was like, we're going to get these chemicals out of your food. We're going to we're going to make sure Americans can eat healthy. And now I see more missiles than I see traction on these types of things. Yeah. And they tell us that oh, it's too crazy to get the life of state out. We have to have 50 different flavors and chips at the gas station. We could never do that. We could never subsidize a program to get the poison out of your food. Oh, another quarter trillion for the war.

40:50It's just fine. And that's the thing. It's so crazy. It's just why wouldn't you resign at this point, especially if you're one of these people like RFK, we're like, this is literally he fought for a decade on this issue and look at it now. Mm-hmm. Pretty crazy. You know what? He said we need more herbicide or herbicide. Is that what he said to it? If you would. Yeah, we love it. I hope this isn't true. Liberal. Yeah, we need more herbicide production stunning as followers. I mean, yeah, I mean, war is peace guys. You didn't hear that. You didn't get the memo. Let's go ahead and go to clip eight. Really quick to ring out this segment because here's the thing. Okay. You know, we've talked about the American military and maybe their limitations a little bit. We got big problems because we got we got real elites. Okay, we got real elite shock troops training out in North Korea. Let's go ahead and show people clip number eight. Oh, hi, hi, hi. Hey, I wouldn't want to mess with him on the battlefield. All right, watch this coming. Oh my god. They're driving nails into the board. Look at that. That's some kung fu stuff right there.

41:56Now, you know, this looks what? No way. Yeah, that's going to stop a bullet, guys. All right, watch this. Okay, that's real. Go back to that. We got to show that again. This is not a joke, guys. Grenade! Talk about jumping on the claymore for your boys. Grenade! Okay, we're having, you know, maybe you're having a little bit of rough day. Maybe I haven't had your coffee yet. You got a long drive ahead of you. At least you're not in North Korean in a PR video losing your frontal cortex. You know, a pile of bricks. Here's the thing. That's all for show. I mean, come on now. Guys just like, wow, in front of you, you're just going to be like, you're dead. So I don't know why they do these things. It's probably theatrics. Maybe it's just deep in that in the culture. In the Pakistan, they have that thing on their border where they literally they do like a dance off, where it's like a martial display. Have you ever seen this? No, we got just a little bit of time.

42:56The crew are absolute wizards. If you can find that and if we get close out with that, yeah, they do it because it's a tribal thing of like, this is our border. This is our culture. This is our border. This is our culture. FU, FU. So like, no guns is just a dance off. They have guns, but they're not pointing them at each other. They're like, it's kind of like a rooster battle. Like they're kind of like stepping like, it's like an intimidation thing, but we see this all around the world. Here's the thing. The Taliban, when they take our military equipment, they do stuff as well. ISIS has the jungle gym and all of that. We've exported our culture to people. So now they're trying to make their own Hollywood movies as well. Yeah, they are trying to make their own Hollywood movies now. I mean, look, North Korea is involved in Ukraine now. They're still there, right? They're still dying. I'm not sure, but they were involved. They were involved heavily, but we see these things, you know, look, I guess there it is. What is going on here? And this is how they do the border dispute. This is how they kind of uh, uh, Chris made it, I guess it'd be the kind of good name of a creature to describe it.

44:00But yeah, we got discussion.