About this episode
One question is beginning to dominate Jackie Henderson's legal battle with ARN.
Who actually made the decision to sack her?
According to court documents, Jackie's legal team says they still don't know who the decision-makers were after she told the company she could no longer work with Kyle Sandilands.
Why does that matter? Could identifying the people behind the decision become one of the most important issues in the entire case?
Michael Byrnes joins us to explain why this seemingly simple question could have significant legal consequences, what the court-ordered independent medical examination means, why Jackie is determined to keep the October hearing dates, and what signals we should be watching for if settlement discussions are happening behind closed doors.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Game Changers Radio publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Game Changers Radio
The next chappter.
Game Changers Radio
The Business of Kyle: When Do Brands Start Calling?
Game Changers Radio
There’s something about Mary.
Game Changers Radio
Inside Kyle's New World: The App, The Audience and The Brand
Game Changers Radio