
About this episode
Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.serioustrouble.show/subscribe
Get every episode summarized
Each time Serious Trouble publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Serious Trouble

If You Can’t Trust Michael Cohen, Who Can You Trust?
Serious Trouble

The Happiest Place on Earth (a Courtroom)
Serious Trouble

Because I Got Highly Likely to Lose an Anti-SLAPP Motion
Serious Trouble

Who's to Judge Jeanine?
Serious Trouble