
About this episode
We need to confront political impossibility.
A few months ago, I was sitting on a train bashing out a furious article about the British government’s climate incompetence. The man next to me was in a zoom call on climate change, vigorously shaking his head. I couldn’t help but ask.
That’s how I met today’s guest, Jonathan Mille, a researcher at University College London’s Climate Action Unit, where he studies systemic risk and the impact of our interdependent global systems on climate change response. Jonathan focuses much of his attention on the physical and political possibility of the energy transition, and in today’s episode we discuss that exact tension between what is physically possible and what is politically possible. We explore the narrative challenge we face as a society, along with the distinct knowledge gaps found in industry, policy circles and business which create blind spots of psychological vulnerabilities, impeding the necessary psychological transition.
© Rachel Donald
Planet: Critical is 100% independent and community-powered. If you value it, and have the means, become a paid subscriber today!
Get full access to Planet: Critical at planetcritical.substack.com/subscribe
Get every episode summarized
Each time Planet: Critical publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Planet: Critical

Health Begins With Earth | Sharon Friel
Planet: Critical

China's Leverage | Kenneth Hammond
Planet: Critical

There Are No Simple Solutions | Jessica Hernandez
Planet: Critical

How the Eco-Crisis is Changing Our Brains | Clayton Aldern
Planet: Critical