Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMay 16, 202559:08pending

The Birthright Citizenship Case Is Actually Something Differently Terrible

About this episode

OA1158 - We start off with some patron questions about what to do when ICE comes to your neighborhood, the one thing that the world’s most annoying white libertarians got right, and how to best exercise the very few rights US citizens have coming back into the country. Then in our main story: This week the Supreme Court heard arguments over birthright citizenship--or did it? Matt explains how they might do something even worse than expected while still striking down Trump’s attempt to end the  Constitutional right to citizenship for everyone born on US soil by executive order. 

Finally, we polish off today’s episode with a meaty footnote about the lies and tyranny of a very different kind of would-be monarch.

  1. Oral arguments in Trump v. CASA (5/15/25)

  2. Trump v. CASA docket 

  3. Western District of PA federal judge Stephanie Haines’s ruling upholding the application of the Alien Enemies Act to members of Tren de Aragua

  4. “Sense of the community” memo dated 4/7/25 finding that Tren de Aragua is not working with the Venezuelan government

  5. Complaint in Coleman et al v. Burger King

 

Get every episode summarized

Each time Opening Arguments publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

The Birthright Citizenship Case Is Actually Something Differently Terrible

Opening Arguments

0:00
59:08

More episodes

More from Opening Arguments

View all episodes →