
Should scientists stand up as things fall down? Advocacy, activism, impartiality and the risks
About this episode
President Donald Trump’s administration is already muzzling government-funded scientists. Closer to home, Australian scientists have their own stories to tell about science censored, stymied or watered down when its findings aren’t convenient to industry or politicians. Should scientists stand up as things fall down? A Tasmanian panel argue why scientists should speak up, and consider the tensions between advocacy and impartiality when they do.
Speakers
Alexandra de BlasScience and environmental communicator, consultantMember, Tasmanian Independent Science Council
Louise CherrieEnvironmental management consultantDr Lila LandowskiNeuroscientist and science communicatorCollege of Health and Medicine, University of TasmaniaBoard director, Science & Technology Australia
The Honourable Megan (Meg) Webb Independent Member for NelsonTasmanian Legislative Council
Robyn WilliamsHost of The Science Show, ABC Radio National
Dr Lisa-ann GershwinBiologist, marine scientist, authorMember, Tasmanian Independent Science Council
Get every episode summarized
Each time Big Ideas publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Big Ideas

Are kid's books too moralistic, worthy, or 'woke'? Andy Griffiths, Hilary Rogers...
Big Ideas

Inside the life of Elizabeth II with royal biographer Robert Hardman
Big Ideas

Tech activist Cory Doctorow says the internet's been enshittified. So is it too...
Big Ideas

John Brack once painted his children. Now his adult daughter tells her story of...
Big Ideas