About this episode
We’re gonna read you the Riot Act. Again. An old friend of Short Circuit returns, the Anti-Riot Act. Perhaps (?) named in homage to its 18th century predecessor, the Congressional statute received a facial test at the Seventh Circuit, and IJ’s Kirby Thomas West tells us how it fared in the face of a guy who requested that everyone bring their family and a brick to a “riot.” He did not do so well in court, but perhaps the Anti-Riot Act has problems anyway? Then we go for a drive down a Houston freeway where Sam Gedge makes a citizen's arrest of a qualified immunity claim while drinking at a local flea market at 2am. The Fifth Circuit served up a wild ride of a case that is too good to pass up but also holds bigger lessons for how judges perceive “split-second decisions” and premeditated lies.
U.S. v. Betts
Hughes v. Garcia
The Riot Act
Short Circuit 146 (4th Cir. Anti-Riot Act case)
Get every episode summarized
Each time Short Circuit publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Short Circuit
Short Circuit 427 | Michigander Administrations
Short Circuit
May 8, 202654:29pending
Short Circuit 426 | Vaccinated Home Distilling
Short Circuit
May 1, 20261:05:28pending
Short Circuit 425 | Live from Penn Law!
Short Circuit
Apr 24, 202655:13pending
Short Circuit 424 | Juries for Securities
Short Circuit
Apr 17, 202640:24pending
