
About this episode
Adam and Mark and open the show with John Ziegler in studio. They open the show talking about how their perceived political affiliations may have possibly hurt them in their professional circles. This leads to a discussion how media narrative can shape the public's perception of a story, and how this pertains to the Sandusky case. Next John informs Adam and Mark about some of the odd circumstances surrounding the Sandusky case, and expresses his belief in the innocence of both Jerry Sandusky and Joe Paterno. He explains how he believes Matt Sandusky is the biggest bad actor involved in the case.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Reasonable Doubt publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Reasonable Doubt

BARD - D4vd Case Gets Darker: Lyrics, Evidence & Horrific Autopsy
Reasonable Doubt
Apr 26, 202629:54failed

BARD - Inside D4vd’s Arrest: What the LA DA Isn’t Saying
Reasonable Doubt
Apr 19, 202624:50failed

BARD - Diddy Appeal Breakdown and the Pizza Argument in Court
Reasonable Doubt
Apr 12, 202620:45failed

BARD - Tiger Woods DUI Case Breakdown and Legal Missteps
Reasonable Doubt
Apr 5, 202616:35failed