Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
historyMar 17, 202624:38

Putting human biology on ice

pplpod

About this episode

Putting human biology on ice

Get every episode summarized

Each time pplpod publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Transcript ready

521 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

Putting human biology on ice

pplpod

0:00
24:38

Full transcript

pplpodPutting human biology on ice. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Forget whatever plans you have this weekend because you're staying at home and playing on SpinQuest. And there's never been a better time to sign up than right now. New users get $30 coin packs for just $10. All the table games you love with hundreds of slot games and real cash prizes. That's at SpinQuest.com, S-P-I-N-Q-U-S-T dot com. SpinQuest is a free to play social casino. Boidware prohibited. Visit SpinQuest.com for more details. So, you know, when we think about survival in extreme situations, our minds usually go straight to, well, warmth. Right, yeah, like fire shelter. Exactly, staying out of the cold. But I want to take you back in time for a second to the brutal freezing battlefields of the Napoleonic Wars. Oh, wow. Okay. Yeah, so there was this military surge in there, Baron Dominique Jean-Lauré. And he noticed something completely baffling. Who was it? Well, the wounded officers, the ones who were given the best care,

kept warm and pampered right near the campfire. They were dying. Wait, the ones by the fire were dying. Yeah, but the poor rank and file infantry men, the ones that were just kind of left out in the freezing mud, they were surviving. Oh, that's incredible. It's a wild, right? It turns out that brutal battlefield cold wasn't killing them. It was actually hitting their biological pause button. I love that framing. Thanks. And today, we are taking a massive, comprehensive, wikipedia article you sent us on targeted temperature management to see how modern hospitals are using that exact same pause button to save lives today. It really is fascinating. It completely flips our standard assumptions about triage and recovery upside down. It really does. And just to set the right visual tone for our discussion today, I've actually changed the backdrop in the studio to a frost covered medical laboratory. I noticed that. It looks great. Yeah, because we are looking at a highly coordinated systemic medical intervention that's basically designed to put human biology on ice.

Okay. Let's unpack this. Targeted temperature management or TTM. What are we actually dealing with here? So TTM is based on the article. It's the active, deliberate lowering of a patient's body temperature. Exactly. We aren't just talking about a slight chill from an open window. Right. The target temperature is often pushed down to somewhere between 32 and 34 degrees Celsius. And for context, normal body temperature is what, around 37 degrees Celsius? Yeah, roughly 37. And this drop is done for a very specific reason to improve health outcomes and brain function after blood flow to the brain has completely stopped. So we're talking about the aftermath of a cardiac arrest. Or, you know, the blockage of an artery by a clot during a stroke. Wow. Okay. So while the technology we use today to achieve that temperature drop is incredibly advanced, the concept itself is, um, it's surprisingly ancient, isn't it? It really is. If we trace the history back, that observation by the Napoleonic Surgeon wasn't even the first time this phenomenon was noted.

Really? Who was earlier? Hippocrates. He actually advocated for packing wounded soldiers in snow and ice to treat their injuries. I mean, that sounds more like medieval torture than medicine. Right. It does seem harsh. But it took a long time for modern medicine to catch up to what Hippocrates observed. How long are we talking? Well, it wasn't until 1945 that the first formal medical article concerning hypothermia was actually published. 1945. That late. Yeah. And that was focusing on patients with severe head injuries. And in the 1950s, a doctor named Rosemoff demonstrated the positive effects of mild hypothermia after brain ischemia and dogs. Brain ischemia. That's a restriction of blood supply, right? Exactly. And around that same time, doctors started using hypothermia in intercerebral aneurysm surgery to create what they called a bloodless field. A bloodless field sounds less like medicine and more like science fiction. It's a very intense term. I'm assuming that means they cool the body so much that circulation slows down to a crawl, which allows surgeons to operate on the brain without catastrophic bleeding.

Precisely. By lowering the body temperature, you reduce the heart rate and blood pressure, shrinking the blood vessels. Makes sense. But for decades after those initial 1950s experiments, the research was incredibly sporadic. And honestly, it was a bit misguided. How so? Well, researchers initially thought that if cold was good, freezing must be better. Oh, no. Yeah. They focused on deep hypothermia, dropping the body down to 20 to 25 degrees Celsius. I have to imagine dropping a human core temperature by 15 degrees causes the body systems to just start shutting down completely. It does. That extreme drop brought a whole host of dangerous side effects, primarily cardiac arrhythmias. The heart just can't handle it. No. The heart simply cannot maintain a normal rhythm at 20 degrees Celsius. It often leads to ventricular fibrillation, making it entirely impractical for most clinical situations. So they had to back off from that extreme? Right. It wasn't until the 1980s that animal studies shifted focus back to mild hypothermia, that 32 to 34 degree range, as a general neuroprotectant.

Got it. And that leads us to the real turning point in the source material. Two landmark human studies were published simultaneously in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2002. Wait, simultaneously. Yep. One in Europe, one in Australia. And they conclusively proved that mild therapeutic hypothermia improved both survival and or logical outcomes after cardiac arrest. And reading through the history, that 2002 publication completely changed the game, didn't it? Oh, overnight. Because right after that, in 2003, the American Heart Association and the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation officially endorsed the use of targeted temperature management. They did, yeah. They did the historical anecdotes. We have the data. But when I was looking at the research, the underlying mechanics tripped me up a bit. What part? Wait, doesn't lack of oxygen kill a cell directly? Like, how do being cold stop a cell from suffocating? It's a great question. Is it, is chilling the body essentially forcing the brain into low power mode?

Like you're dimming the screen and stopping background apps so the battery doesn't die before the ambulance gets there? So what's fascinating here is, the mechanism isn't just about saving battery, though that is the foundation of it. So the analogy holds up a bit. It does. When your phone goes into low power mode, it reduces the demand for power. For every one degree, Celsius drop in body temperature. A cell's metabolic rate. It's demand for energy and oxygen. Slows down by five to seven percent. Wow. So if you drop the temperature by like four degrees. The brain's oxygen demand plummets by up to 28 percent. That is massive. But it goes deeper than that. And this addresses your question about cellular suffocation. Cell death is not directly caused by oxygen deprivation. Wait, really? Yeah. It is not an immediate suffocation. It is a slow motion cascade. I need to make sure I'm getting this. It's not the lack of oxygen itself that's the killer. No. Cells need oxygen for one primary reason to manufacture ATP. And ATP is the energy molecule, right?

Exactly. It's the molecule that cells use to store and transport energy. Without oxygen, ATP production just stops. Okay. No oxygen, no energy. Right. And the reason that is lethal is because cells desperately need ATP to fuel the microscopic pumps on their surface. Pumps? Yeah. These pumps regulate their internal environment. They constantly use energy to push necessary ions in and harmful ions out. So the oxygen stops, the ATP factory shuts down. And without that energy, the cell loses the ability to pump out the trash. That's a great way to put it. Infectively poisons itself. That is exactly what happens. When those pumps shut down, the intracellular environment can no longer be regulated. Calcium and sodium ions just flood into the cell. And homeostasis is destroyed. Entirely. And that toxic internal environment is what triggers apoptosis program cell death. It's the catastrophic failure of the cell's ion pumps due to the lack of oxygen that ultimately kills the tissue. That reframes a stroke or a cardiac arrest entirely. It is literally a domino effect.

It really is. But if the dominoes are falling because the pumps are broken, what is the cold actually doing to the cell structure to stop it? This is the true genius of targeted temperature management. Even a small drop in temperature physically alters the lipid bilayer of the cell membrane. Like the outer wall of the cell. Exactly. Its strengthens and stabilizes it, making the membrane more impermeable. Oh, I see. So even when the ATP pumps fail, the fortified membrane acts as a physical barrier. It becomes rigid enough to help prevent that fatal influx of unwanted calcium and sodium ions. That is wild. You're essentially freezing the dominoes in place before they can topple. Exactly. You're buying time. It physically fortifies the walls of the cell. But, you know, reading further into the source material, the lack of oxygen is only half the battle. Right, the reperfusion. Yeah. Eventually, a doctor has to restart the heart or clear the clot. The blood has to come rushing back. And paradoxically, the blood returning seems to be just as dangerous as the blood leaving.

You are bringing up reperfusion injury, which is a massive hurdle in emergency medicine. It just seems so counterintuitive. It does. When blood supply is finally restored to a tissue after a period of ischemia, meaning lack of blood flow, the body doesn't just return to normal. It triggers a massive, violent, inflammatory immune response. But why? Why does the body attack itself just because the blood is back? Because the tissue has been starving, and its chemistry is fundamentally altered. Okay. When a massive wave of fresh oxygen suddenly interacts with those altered damaged cells, you get immense oxidative stress. You get a surge in free radical production. Which sounds terrible. It is. This inflammatory response causes the brain to swell, leading to increased intracranial pressure. And the skull doesn't have any extra room. Exactly. That pressure squashes the brain against the skull, which causes even more cell injury and death. It's like a rescue squad showing up to a house fire. But their hoses are spraying gasoline instead of water.

The rescue itself is causing the structural damage. That is a brilliant analogy. And hypothermia acts as a shield against that overzealous rescue attempt. How so? The cold moderates that intracranial pressure. It suppresses the harmful inflammatory immune responses, and it drastically reduces the production of those damaging free radicals during reperfusion. Here's where it gets really interesting for me. Knowing why it works on a cellular level is incredible, but it begs an almost absurd logistical question. Logistics are always the hard part. Right. Like, how do doctors practically turn a living, breathing, human being into an ice box? It's not easy. I mean, human body does not want to be cold. We have millions of years of evolution designed specifically to keep our core temperature at exactly 37 degrees. We do. And the body fights back violently against the cooling process. When the core body temperature drops below a certain threshold, typically around 36 degrees Celsius, the hypothalamus in the brain sounds the alarm. And it triggers its primary defense mechanism, which is shivering.

Exactly. Shivering. Because shivering is just intense involuntary muscle friction, right? It generates heat. Yes. The body is desperately trying to warm itself back up, which burns massive amounts of energy, the exact opposite of what you want when you are trying to put the brain in low power mode. Which is why inducing therapeutic hypothermia is an incredibly intense pharmacological process. Medical teams cannot just place someone in an ice bath. They just shake themselves to death. Basically, before the cooling even begins, they have to administer a heavy cocktail of drugs, just to suppress that shivering reflex. Like what kind of drugs? We were talking about medications like acetaminophen, opioids like fentanyl, and sedatives like propyl. Wow. But I imagine even with heavy narcotics, the brain is still trying to force the muscles to spasm in generate heat. What happens if the shivering won't stop? Then the patient is often placed under general anesthesia, or given paralytic medications like vecoronium. Yeah. They essentially have to medically paralyze the patient to stop the muscles from moving.

That is intense. It is. Only after that evolutionary survival programming is overridden, can the actual physical cooling process begin? I am looking at the list of ways they actually lower the temperature and the physical engineering of it is just wild. It's very creative. You can't just throw a bag of crushed ice on someone. The methods in the sources range from deceptively simple to pure sci-fi. The methods are incredibly diverse. I'm here with SpinQuest, where you can play and win from the comfort of your own home with hundreds of slot games and all of the table games you love with real cash prizes. Right now, $30 coin packs are on sale for $10 for new users. It's all at SpinQuest.com. That's S-P-I-N-H-U-E-S-T dot com. SpinQuest is a free to play social casino. You are prohibited to visit SpinQuest.com for more details. You're listening to a podcast right now.

Driving, working out, walking the dog. If you're into podcasts, chances are you have something to say too. With RSS.com, starting your own is free and easy. Upload an episode, and we distribute it to Apple podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and hundreds more. Track your listeners, see where they're from, and start earning from ads like this. Even with just 10 listeners a month. If you've been thinking about starting a podcast, this is your sign. Start free at RSS.com. As of 2013, the research suggests that it's actually unclear if one method is definitively better than the others. They all have unique engineering challenges. What's the most common one? The most common and well-studied method involves water blankets. You wrap the patient's torso and legs and blankets or vests that have cold water continuously circulating through them. Okay, so it lowers the temperature exclusively through skin contact. Right, covering about 70% of the patient's surface area. But if you're just putting cold water on the skin,

doesn't the body temperature plunge too fast or unevenly? The source is mentioned overshoot as a major complication. Yes. The temperature overshoot is a significant engineering flaw. Because you are cooling from the outside in, it takes time for the cold to reach the core. Oh, of course. By the time the core registers is 23 degrees, the skin and outer tissues are much colder. And that cooling momentum carries their core temperature even lower, dropping them below 32 degrees Celsius. Which is getting into the danger zone we talked about earlier. Exactly. That drastically increases the risk of adverse medical events. So how do they fix that? newer machines try to combat this using core temperature probes, often rectal probes, that feed continuous data back to the blanket software to automatically adjust the water temperature. But it remains a blunt instrument. So if water blankets risk burning the skin and overshooting the target temperature, how do doctors bypass the skin entirely? Because that's where the engineering gets a bit terrifying.

You are referring to cooling catheters. This is an invasive procedure that must be performed by a fully trained physician, often an interventional radiologist. Okay. They insert a highly precise triple lumen catheter directly into the femoral vein in the leg. The femoral vein is huge. This catheter has a metal coated tube or a balloon through which cooled saline solution circulates. Wait, injecting cold saline directly into the bloodstream? No, no, and that is a crucial distinction. The cold saline circulates inside a closed loop within the catheter. It never actually touches the blood. It just chills the metal or balloon. And as the patient's blood flows past this incredibly cold surface in the vein, it cools down. So you are literally chilling the blood from the inside out as it circulates through the body? Exactly. That has to be incredibly efficient compared to putting a cold blanket on someone's chest. Oh, it is. It can reduce the body temperature at a rapid rate of 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius per hour.

And because the control unit is directly monitoring the blood temperature inside the vein, it can dial in the core body temperature to within 0.1 degrees Celsius of the target level. So no overshoot? It completely eliminates the overshoot problem. Plus, it allows doctors to re-warm the patient at a very slow, steady, controlled rate, which is crucial for preventing those dangerous spikes in brain pressure we discussed earlier. But the trade-off is significant physical risk, right? You are threading a foreign object into a major vein. There are definitely risks. The sources note severe risks of infection, vascular puncture, and deep vein thrombosis. Like a blood clot forming around that catheter in the femoral vein could travel to the lungs and cause a fatal pulmonary embolism. That is a real concern. So you are trading the bluntness of the blankets for the precision and physical risk of a catheter? Exactly. Which is why engineers look for a way to target the brain directly, bypassing the full body complications altogether. That led to transnasal evaporative tooling.

This was the method that I just couldn't wrap my head around initially. I don't understand how cooling the nasal cavity cools the brain fast enough to matter in an emergency. It really comes down to human anatomy. Yeah. The nasal cavity sits directly underneath the base of the skull right underneath the brain. Right. It also has an incredibly high surface area and massive blood flow. This device uses too small cannulae inserted directly into the patient's nose. And then what? It sprays a continuous mist of a volatile coolant that evaporates instantly. It's literally like spraying frion straight into the hard drive. Functionally, yes. As blood passes through that incredibly cold area in the nasal cavity, it cools down significantly before circulating up into the rest of the brain. That is brilliant. It's targeted right at the most critical organ. And research shows it can drop the brain's temperature by 2.6 degrees Celsius per hour. The practical application for you, listening right now, is amazing here. Because this device is so compact, it doesn't need a whole hospital room or a surgeon to insert a femoral line.

No, not at all. It can be used by paramedics right at the point of cardiac arrest or in the back of a moving ambulance. They can start saving the brain before the patient even hits the emergency room doors. It's a huge leap forward for pre-hospital care. And the last method mentioned in the sources shows how adaptable this technology is. Cool caps. Yes, these are non-invasive helmets or caps made of neoprene or silicone. Filled with gel or continuously circulating liquid, cool to as low as negative 25 to negative 30 degrees Celsius. They target the scalp and the brain specifically. And they aren't just for cardiac arrest. No, they have other very important uses. In the sources note, they are used specifically to prevent cerebral palsy and newborns who suffer from oxygen deprivation at birth. Yes. And they are also widely used by chemotherapy patients to prevent a reduced hair loss. By freezing the scalp, it constricts the blood vessels, physically preventing the toxic chemo drugs from reaching and killing the hair follicles. It is a perfect example of taking a core physiological principle, cold, causing vasoconstriction and slowing metabolism,

and applying it across radically different medical disciplines. Okay, I have to play devil's advocate here. Fair enough. It can't be all perfect. We've talked about the miracles and the brilliant engineering, but what are the downsides? Because freezing a critically ill patient, paralyzing their muscles, dropping their core temperature, that has to come with severe collateral damage. It absolutely does. When you drop the body's temperature, you suppress everything, including the immune system. That makes sense. The comprehensive review found an increased risk of pneumonia and sepsis, because the white blood cells just aren't functioning in optimal speeds. They're in low power mode, too. Exactly. You also suppress the body's ability to clot. The enzymes responsible for coagulating blood are highly temperature sensitive. Oh, wow. Hypothermia lowers the clotting threshold, which means there is a trend towards increased bleeding. That is obviously incredibly dangerous for trauma patients or stroke victims who might already have internal hemorrhaging. It's a massive risk factor they have to weigh. The source material also outlined a complication called cold diuresis.

Can you explain what is actually happening there without getting too deep into the medical jargon? Of course. When you are cold, your body tries to conserve heat by constricting the blood vessels in your arms and legs. Right. Pushing all your blood to your core to protect your vital organs. Yes. But because all that blood is now squeezed into a smaller central area, your central blood pressure goes up. Okay, that makes sense. Your kidneys sense this high pressure. And while they panic, they try to fix it by filtering out massive amounts of fluid to lower the overall volume. So the patient produces a massive amount of urine just because they are cold? Exactly. But because the body is fleshing out so much fluid, it takes essential minerals right out the door with it. Like what? We're talking about a dangerous plunge in potassium, magnesium, and phosphorus levels in the blood. And those are important. Incredibly. These minerals are critical for heart rhythm and muscle function, so it requires constant, vigilant monitoring and intravenous replacement by the ICU team.

It's a massive high wire act for the doctors, which brings us to a really crucial point about the current state of this treatment. Because the medical consensus on TTM isn't as settled as it was 20 years ago. If we connect this to the bigger picture, this is exactly how medical science self-corrects and evolves. For certain conditions, TTM remains the absolute standard of care. For neonatal encephalopathy infants who suffer oxygen loss at birth, cooling the whole body, or just the head to 33 or 34 degrees for 72 hours, is proven to significantly reduce mortality and neurological damage. It is undeniably a life saver there. Yes. But the Wikipedia article highlights that for adults, the protocol is being heavily questioned. Remember those landmark 2002 studies that push everyone to cool patients to 33 degrees? Why is the medical community walking that back now? It comes down to how those original studies were designed. In 2002, the control group, the patients who weren't cooled, were essentially just left alone at room temperature.

Which seems normal, right? It does, but many of those patients naturally develop severe fevers after their cardiac arrests. A fever of 39 or 40 degrees cooks the already vulnerable brain cells. Oh, wow. The group that was cooled to 33 degrees obviously didn't develop fevers. So at the time, research has concluded that 33 degrees was a magic number for neuroprotection. Ah, I see. But later on, they decided to test 33 degrees against just keeping the patient at a strictly controlled normal body temperature. Precisely. More recent, massive clinical trials tested aggressively cooling patients to 33 degrees, again, simply keeping them at a near normal temperature of 36 degrees. And what happened? The results were stunning. There was no significant difference in long-term neurological outcomes or survival between the two groups. That is a massive aha moment. It appears that the real benefit of targeted temperature management in these adult cardiac arrest cases was never the deep freeze. It was simply the strict prevention of the fever.

By locking the body at 36 degrees, you prevent the fever from ever occurring, saving the brain from that secondary inflammatory damage. And you completely bypass the extreme risks of deep sedation, pneumonia, and bleeding associated with 33 degrees. It is a brilliant refinement of the data. And the sources also point out that despite theoretical benefits, TTM is completely unproven right now for treating strokes or traumatic brain injuries in humans. Really? Yeah, this animal model is looking incredibly promising, but the human trials just haven't shown clear benefits yet. The human body is infinitely complex. A therapy that works perfectly for a newborn's brain might not translate it all to a six-year-old stroke patient. So what does this all mean? For you listening right now, we've gone on quite a journey. We really have. We started with the surprising survival of freezing soldiers on an Napoleonic battlefield. We unpacked how a lack of oxygen doesn't kill a cell directly, but rather shuts off its ATP power supply leading to a toxic collapse. We explored how the cold stabilizes that cell wall,

freezing the dominoes of death in place, and shielding the brain from its own toxic rescue attempt. It's amazing when you think about it. And we looked at the extreme engineering doctors use cooling catheters and transnasal mist, just to override our body's evolutionary desire to shiver. And we saw how the science is constantly refining itself, learning that sometimes just preventing a fever was doing all the heavy lifting. Exactly. It shows us that human biology is incredibly malleable. Sometimes deliberately pausing the system is the only way to save it. This raises an important question. One that I think sits at the very frontier of medical science. What's that? Well, we have just spent the last 20 minutes discussing how dropping our core body temperature by a mere few degrees can completely pause a catastrophic cellular death cascade. It forces you to wonder what other extreme environmental triggers are our cells secretly waiting for. Oh, that's an interesting thought. If the simple application of cold can unlock a biological pause button,

what other hidden states of survival are locked away in our biology? Just waiting for the right temperature, the right pressure, or the right environment to be discovered? Are we carrying dormant, survival mechanisms that we just haven't figured out how to switch on yet? That's wild. Thank you for joining us on this deep dive into the resilient, surprising, and sometimes freezing machinery of the human body. Next time you step out into the cold and feel that shiver, remember the complex biological war happening right beneath your skin. Until next time. You know what? It sucks to be bored. But when I get on my phone and play real casino games on SpinQuest.com, the time flies by that two-hour wait at the DMV seems like 10 minutes. Play your favorite spots. Live Blackjack live prepped with a live dealer. New players, $30 coin packs are on sale for $10. Play SpinQuest.com and you'll never be bored again. SpinQuest is a free to play social casino. Boydware prohibited. Visit SpinQuest.com for more details.

You're listening to a podcast right now. Driving, working out, walking the dog. If you're in a podcast, chances are you have something to say too. With RSS.com, starting your own podcast is free and easy. Upload an episode and we distribute it to Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music, and more. Track your listeners, see where they're from, and start earning from ads just like this. If you've been thinking about starting a podcast, this is your sign. Start your new podcast for free today at RSS.com. www.rSS.com

More episodes

More from pplpod

View all episodes →