About this episode
When the first Nuremberg trial of Nazi war criminals came to an end, the ground-breaking international tribunal handed down 12 death sentences. Seventy-five years on, is the world any better at delivering justice for the worst of crimes? In the years that followed, there were hopes that an evolving mechanism of international justice would deter and punish further heinous acts of mass murder and genocide. Does it remain an impossible ideal? Stephen Sackur speaks to international lawyer and author Philippe Sands.
(Photo: Philippe Sands in the Hardtalk studio)
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Interview publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Interview
Rene Haas, Arm CEO: AI demand won’t slow
The Interview
Leah Solivan, TaskRabbit founder: How the gig economy falls short
The Interview
Daron Acemoglu, Economist: Liberal democracy is in crisis
The Interview
Michelle Bachelet, UN Chief candidate: Time for a woman to lead
The Interview