Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
newsMar 16, 202532:12pending

Penetration Tests: useful, pointless, harmful, required, ineffective? - Phillip Wylie - ESW #398

About this episode

Penetration tests are probably the most common and recognized cybersecurity consulting services. Nearly every business above a certain size has had at least one pentest by an external firm.

Here's the thing, though - the average ransomware attack looks an awful lot like the bog standard pentest we've all been purchasing or delivering for years. Yet thousands of orgs every year fall victim to these attacks. What's going on here? Why are we so bad at stopping the very thing we've been training against for so long?

This Interview with Phillip Wylie will provide some insight into this! Spoiler: a lot of the issues we had 10, even 15 years ago remain today.

Segment resources:

Show Notes: https://securityweekly.com/esw-398

Get every episode summarized

Each time Enterprise Security Weekly (Video) publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

No transcript yet

This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.

Penetration Tests: useful, pointless, harmful, required, ineffective? - Phillip Wylie - ESW #398

Enterprise Security Weekly (Video)

0:00
32:12

More episodes

More from Enterprise Security Weekly (Video)

View all episodes →