Menachos 63 מנחות דף סג

Shalom to all!

Today's half of the morning is a summer game, a weird summer,

right at the top of the brain, new mission,

and today's half of the sponsor, Leland Ishmas,

March, March, May, March, Yaka, May,

Hurnesh, oh my shit, I have an ally, y'all.

That means she tells us,

Hoi, me, for a person says,

I really love a machwas,

I think we're going to myself to bring a machwas.

Loy of a machwas,

he's not going to bring a machwas in a machwas,

and if he says machwas on bringing a machwas,

Loy of a machwas, he's not going to bring a machwas.

So obviously the question is,

Ma, I mean machwas a machwas.

What's the difference between a machwas a machwas?

These two different machwas.

The answer is,

Marchashe is Yashla Kisui.

Marchashe is Mincha.

The pan that it's being made in has a cover,

where as machwas a machwas,

a machwas doesn't have a cover.

There will be a secluded,

that's where he has a glues understanding.

Whereas I can even get my ally there,

he says,

Marchashe is Amuka,

Umasa Rakhshen.

Marchashe is a deep pan,

and the way that it's made is Rakhshen,

which really means to shake or creep around.

The word remiss in the puzzle,

when it's talking about creepy crawlies,

the target of that word is Rakhshen.

As well Mincha is fried in his deep pan of oil,

so when you touch it,

it kind of shakes, if you will,

whereas machwas,

Sofo Masa Akashen.

A machwas is very shallow pan.

Sofo is a lush enough floating

because everything in oil looks like it's floating

because it's extremely shallow,

and it's baked very hard

because the oil basically burns off,

so it's not sitting in a lot of oil,

and so when a machwas is baked,

it's very hard and crunchy.

So, more because by asking my time with your B.A.C.

what's your B.A.C.'s reasoning,

why does he say that a Marchashe has a cover

and a machwas doesn't?

Even if you want to say,

his reason is because Marchashe is the Asya Rakhshelay,

is brought because of Rakhshelay.

Rakhshelay means like the stirrings

or the movings of the heart.

Like the Pasek says,

Rochash Lebi Dover Toiv,

my heart is a stir,

it's moving with a good thing,

and even though it's a positive Pasek,

we're actually talking about something negative,

namely when a person's having a bad thought,

he has some sort of machwas savera,

and that's in his heart that's covered up,

that's concealed,

so it's where Marchashe has a cover,

and ooh,

machwas, the Asya machwas wa pa,

and machwas is different,

it's come because of some of those expressed by the mouth,

because the armory in she gets like what people say,

minabayach ne vuche,

then it's letting out sounds,

and so a person's going to bring a machwas

for speaking improperly,

and speaking is from the lips,

and that's uncovered,

so a minas machwas is uncovered.

If you're going to say that's the reason for Abiyasi,

well, I'm Ibrahim,

one I say the exact opposite,

that machwas, the Asya amach buay halave,

machwas comes for that which is hidden in the heart,

the rest of us, we know the Pasek tells us,

lamanach basal of Rayaach,

why have you hid and run away,

mean why you run away in secret,

as I would tell us that a machwas,

actually should have a cover,

and machwas has the Asya arachusha,

machwas has comes because of ruchusha halave,

improper speech,

because I'm willing to say people say,

have a machwas, if I say,

that is lips removing,

and so going to this machwas,

should not have a cover,

as this can be your basis reason,

they answer is, you're right,

Elg Mark Mirilat,

he just has a cabal from his ribayim all the way up,

then machwas has a cover,

and machwas doesn't,

and it's not based off of these psocum.

Now going to the next sheet,

I'll run away and I'm overhulu,

and here's his source,

machwas has amuga,

machwas has his deep,

meaning it's a deep pan,

it takes up because the psocum says,

we call nasa,

ba, machwas has anything that's made,

it's done in a machwas has,

which means that it's inside the pan,

so it must be that it's deep,

and machwas suffa,

machwas is shallow,

it takes up the psocum says,

ve al machwas,

on a machwas,

which means that it's basically a very shallow pan,

and there's no inside of it,

so that's why a lot of shanova al is used.

Now, turn around and we'll be right,

so the shanova shanova shanova says,

oh, I'm here for a person says,

ha, real life,

machwas has,

I take upon myself,

machwas has,

he didn't say,

be machwas,

in machwas,

he said,

this has to be left until you're not becomes,

oh, why is that msapkelhood,

because when shanova is msapkel,

y'all shum clean it grew,

is this called because of a cle,

meaning it's a machwas from machwas,

called such,

because it's made in such a cle,

and therefore when a person says,

ha, real life, machwas has,

he's really saying that he's gonna bring the cle itself,

I'll shum say it,

or is machwas called that,

because that's how it's made,

and therefore when the person says,

ha, real life, machwas has,

he's gonna bring a machwas,

machwas not that he's gonna bring the pan,

so that's why it's a traffic verb,

he shum a,

for example,

with dominant calmamos,

and those white dots,

or like種us pull-blees,

some Minneapolis does something that's made in marches,

in a Marjasha's or Ana Marjvas.

Al-Mawisi from here says,

Bezhelal al-Shumha-Kailem-Nikru.

It's a Mirkha's called such,

because of the cle that it's made in,

Velay al-Shumha say him,

not because of the way that it's made.

And therefore, when a person says,

how are you lying?

Marjasha's not Bim Marjasha's,

but Marjasha's,

that means he's can actually bring the pan,

called Marjasha's,

and not a Mirkha's Marjasha's.

Now, let's just go back for a second

and explain what Bezhel was saying over here

regarding this Cobbos Amic.

So if you're using the Isvahada Gomorrah,

Marjasha brings a handy illustration over here,

where even though it's not 3D,

so it's a little bit hard to imagine,

if you could think of it in 3D terms,

the whole middle section is actually empty,

it's air space,

and the whole outer section with these three walls,

that's basically rough drawing of tongs.

That's how we got translated Cobbos.

And so it's basically this really interesting cle that's

kind of shaped like a chess or a you,

however you want to call it.

And when the pieces of door placed inside,

they're able to be baked as individual ball,

individual loaves.

And if you take a look at the bottom right hand corner,

guys, if it's a you name,

you'll see basically a black circle

with a bunch of small white circles in it.

It kind of looks like a pancake pan,

I've never seen those before.

It's this really handy pan that has circles made

into it that you pour the pancake batter into

that makes perfectly round pancakes.

That's also some sort of drawing

of perhaps what this cle looked like,

either which way Bezhel is basically trying to describe,

then when you put the dough of the Marjasha's inside of it,

it made these separate little loaves,

and that's how it was done.

And now we'll not another much now.

We continue to discuss Menachais,

and over here we discuss something we have mentioned previously,

which is Menachais Maafetainor,

Menachais baked in Aven,

and there's two different ways that it could be made.

That's either Chalois or Rikiken.

Chalois are usually translated as loaves,

and these were baked with oil.

Now Rikiken are kind of like crackers or wafers.

They were baked with out oil.

They were just smeared with oil after they were baked.

So I'm going to show you tells us,

let's say a person says, I really love a Tainor.

I think about myself to remember Menachais in Aven.

So Leu-Yafi Maafet Kupach,

he's not bringing his Menachais baked in a Kupach.

A Kupach was kind of like an Aven

who was something similar to it,

also Leu-Yafi Maafet or Aven.

He's not going to bring it if he was baked on her Aven,

which is tiles.

Basically, there were earthenware tiles that were heated up.

They were made boiling hot, and you could bake on them.

So for Menachais baked on that,

it's not counted as a Menachak.

And also Maafi Yarsarviem,

if it's baked in pots of Arabs,

which is also another way that used to bake some sort of bread,

that's also not valid,

because none of these are considered a Tainor.

However, if you don't remember who he says,

Leu-Yafi Maafet Kupach, if he wants,

he could bring it baked in a Kupach

that is considered an Aven to this extent.

Let's say Persian says Eurelia-Milkhas Maafet.

I think about myself to bring this Minachais Maafet.

Leu-Yafi Maafet Kupach,

He sacrived Karben Mincha Maffa Tanor.

Another positive says,

Khomein Khashir to offer Bhat Tanor.

And what does that tell us?

La Hakhshir Maffa Kupach,

it's coming to include a Maffa Kupach,

but that's also considered a Tanor.

And our Hashimah Hashimah says,

Tanor Tanor Schnee Ba'amim,

would be learned from this double lashing of Tanor,

Echash Teyafiyah Hashimah Tanor.

One is teaching us that we baked in a Tanor,

Echash Ayak Deishin Bhat Tanor.

And the other one is teaching us that it becomes Qadaish

in the Tanor that when it's baked in this oven,

that's when it becomes officially

with this higher level of Kedusha of a Mancha.

We hold it as Svara Bhat Tanor.

We've mentioned that says,

which is when we say,

Tazas loyalm have a Raghul Lamaar,

Shta'a La Hakham La Hakham,

and Qashir is Ma'zara, Qashir is Ma'zara, Qashir is Ma'zara.

We should always be Raghul,

accustomed to say that the Shta'a La Hakham La Hakham,

they're cusher if they're baked in Azara,

and they're also cusher if they're baked in Bays Pagi,

which is like a part outside Azara.

It was like an area that was next to the Bays of Miktash,

but the idea is that this Bays Pagi place

is outside Azara.

Now for corn from Shemen,

baking the Mancha in the oven is being marked as shit,

while that means that we're being marked as something

outside Azara, and that means that they would be puzzles.

I had this, it makes sense.

So you're right, Amarava Rava explains,

Amarwa were really mean to say,

meaning what herb-shemen's telling us is,

she had a decently shum Tanor,

as that he should be marked as them,

with intention that they're going to be baked in the oven,

but not that actually baking them in the oven,

makes them coddash.

We continue to mention that said,

how really Miktash Ma'afa lay out the Miktash of a Khulu,

but if he said I'm gonna bring a Miktash Ma'afa,

he can't bring half a house and half her kick in,

so Tanor Banu even bright-sawed,

the positive tells us of his sacrifice,

when you bring what we learn from here,

because the talk of last is divided with shots,

this referring to when a person is being marked,

he's doing some of the shots,

he's just doing it on his own, not that he has to,

then when the positive says,

Karban Mincha,

I'll be here to explain that what's his teaching on us,

meaning nine loaimahare lie Miktash Ma'afa.

How do I know that if a person says,

I take upon myself to bring a Miktash Ma'afa,

Shalo Yavi Miktash Ma'afa,

Shalo Yavi Miktash Ma'afa,

that half aren't lying to be chaos,

and half are half her kick in,

because the positive says, Karban Mincha,

and that tells us Karban Echanamartil Khavlai Shlai Shakarbanis,

it has to be one Karban, it has to be the same type,

and not two or three types,

so it has to be either Khalois or Rikiken,

it can't be different styles.

No, I'm really upset, I'm really told him,

so I'm going to be like this,

so I'm going to call Karban Karban Shnepa Amim,

does he say Karban twice?

No, Baha'lai, loi, Nema, Ella, Karban Echan,

it only used the word Karban once over here,

and if never buy Khalois or Rikiken,

it also talks about Khalois and Rikiken,

so my aunt from here would say,

that if he wants to bring only Khalois, that's fine,

only Rikiken that's also fine,

but if he wants to bring half Khalois and half Rikiken,

that's also okay.

And if he were to do that, so Ubalan, he mixes them together,

meaning after he begs half of them as Khalois,

and half of them as Rikiken, he crumbles them up,

mixes them all together, the comments mishnehen,

and then he takes the comments from both of them,

and when the comments of Al-Biyadim Echanashnein,

if he took the khmizah,

and only one type came up in his hand,

Yatsah, that's all counts for both of them.

The bottom line is Ripshim's learning

that since it only says,

Ripshim's learning,

that since it only says the word carbon once over here,

and mentions both Khalois and Rikiken,

that tells us that the Mir Khasmafe Tanur

is allowed to be both Khalois and Rikiken together,

it doesn't have to be one style.

And if he has to be who they are,

he tells us,

then when I'm not going to rely on Mir Khasmafe,

I don't know if a person takes upon himself

to bring Mir Khasmafe,

Shaloyah, if you're not going to be going to Rikiken,

that he's not a bring,

half Khalois and half Rikiken,

then why don't we just go for a success,

and then bring Khashat to the offender,

then the positive says,

what do we learn from here?

And then ma'v'chal,

her amr-lamata, just the word v'chal,

that's said later on, meaning it's said,

regarding the last two Mir Khas,

shna'i Mir Khalookin, that's two totally separate types,

because the last two Mir Khas that are mentioned are,

Mir Khasmafe, and Khalois,

so those are obviously two separate types of Mir Khas,

the first one has oil,

and the second one is Khalois,

dry, it doesn't have any oil,

so aff v'chal,

I'm going to go for the first one,

and I'm going to go for the first one,

and I'm going to go for the first one,

and I'm going to go for the first one,

her amr-lamala,

so to the word v'chal, that's mentioned earlier,

meaning when we're speaking about Mir Khasmafe,

shna'i Mir Khalookin,

that's talking about two separate types,

and even though Mir Khasmafe,

is either Khalois or Rikikin,

still they're treated as two totally separate types,

and you're not gonna bring half Khalois,

half Rikikin,

and that's where we have to review this way

of understanding it.

So now that we're just asked,

Rikikin, what about our first sheet of Rikikin?

Shopper, come, Rikikin,

Rikikin seems to be saying good.

In other words, Rikikin's response to Rikikin,

seems to be really solid.

That since the Pasek only says the word carbon once,

so that tells us that both Khalois and Rikikin

are the same exact thing,

and so you could bring half Khalois half Rikikin if you want.

How would you be able to respond to that?

So I'm gonna call you,

it'll tell you,

since the Pasek says,

Bashaman says the word shaman twice.

In other words, when it talks about Mir Khasmafe,

or it says,

Soyless Khalois, Matois, Buluis, Bashaman,

or Rikikin, Matois, Mishuchen, Bashaman.

So when it talks about the Khalois and Rikikin,

it uses the word shaman by each of them.

Carbon-carbon-domy,

it says if it says the word carbon twice,

so even though it doesn't actually have the word carbon twice,

it says if it has it twice,

and that tells us that the Khalois are separate from Rikikin,

and you can't mix them together

when you're bringing them in Khasmafe, Tanoor.

You ever have shaman, he'd respond to that by saying,

Iloyk, Siv, Bashaman, Bashaman,

if it didn't say the word shaman twice over here,

have a meaner, I would actually think,

they'd dof come out to Khalois and Matois Rikikin.

When a person says that he's gonna bring him in Khasmafe, Tanoor,

he actually has to bring half Khalois and half Rikikin,

because we're gonna be using the word shaman once

to be applied to both Khalois and Rikikin,

I would think I have to bring both Khalois and Rikikin,

but Khasla Khudayu or Rikikin Khudayu, Amalai,

but just Khalois alone or Rikikin alone,

I would think that one is not allowed to do that.

Mashaman, that's what Khadish is,

the terrorist telling us by saying the word shaman twice

that actually if a person wants to bring just Khalois

or just Rikikin, that's also fine.

Now, just a one more clarification of this,

Ribiyas, Ribhudah, Hainu Avowah,

Ribiyas, Ribhudah, Sheetah,

that's the same thing as his father,

both Ribiyas, the son of Ribhudah,

and Ribhudah himself,

do not allow bringing a half Khalois and half Rikikin,

they have two different sources,

but they still agree to the principal matter,

that you have to bring either Khalois or a Rikikin,

so what's the difference between the two of them?

The answer is a Khavanayu, de-e-awad,

the Nafcamino is,

Bidiyavad, if he ended up doing it,

if he brought half Khalois, half Rikikin,

Watalachah, Ribhudah, it's Khasher, Bidiyavad,

Ribhudah, Ribhudah, it's not,

and it's because specifically in Ribiyas's Joshua,

where he compares the later Tuminachas that were mentioned,

namely Mincha with oil and Mincha without.

Two, the earlier Tuminachas,

in other words, a two to four ways to bring

a Mincha's Mafatanaur,

so just like by the later Tuminachas,

one with oil and without, if one is done like the other,

Mincha's supposed to be done with oil is brought without,

where Mincha's supposed to be brought without oil is brought with,

that's totally Passal, even Bidiyavad,

so it'd be the same thing regarding Mincha's Mafatanaur,

if it was brought half for Kikin, half Khalois,

it would be Passal.

Hajalachah, Mincha's master finishing the fifth pair

and Mincha's Mafatanaur,

just to finish this pair together,

we should finish this entire Mafatanaur together,

and of course, all of Shazbavli together.

I would have further do moving right on to the next pair,

and over here, we're discussing another type of car with Mincha,

which is known as the Mincha's Imer,

as we already mentioned this many times

in the Mafatanaur until now,

we know that the Imer was brought on the second day of Passach,

this is actually when we start counting Sphere's Imer,

from the bringing of the Imer,

we also know, as we mentioned previously,

that the bringing of the Imer allows one to eat Khada,

which allows one to eat brand new grain,

so we're gonna have many specifics about the Imer,

the first discussion is gonna be regarding harvesting the barley,

we know the barley carbon Imer is harvested

mutze the first day of Passach,

meaning the night of the 16th of Nisan,

that's the night of the first day of Chalamahid,

it's then ground into flour and sifted into

an esorion of silas, which is very fine flour,

and the next morning, the Mincha's Imer is brought.

So, Misha Talsar-Bishmal, Imer Shmal says,

Imer, how do you bother Shabis?

Mishal is sain on Shabis,

when the second day of Passach, the 16th of Nisan,

falls on a Chabis, so the Imer comes from three-sav barley,

meaning they would harvest three-sav barley,

and that was sifted down into one esorion of flour,

and before that was the weekday Mikhameh,

it was made out of five-sav, Mikhameh,

Misha Talsar-Bishmal says,

the weather was Shabis for a weekday,

it came from three-sav flour.

Another Mikhameh,

from the last day of the year,

when he says,

when the Imer was being harvested on Chabis,

when he nicked the herb, he was harvested by just one person,

and with one sickle,

he was cut by one basket,

in other words, there was just one person doing everything,

or there was a bikhail,

when he was being harvested during the week,

Bishal ish with three people,

Bishal ish kupas, three baskets,

Bishal ish mahal ish,

and three sickles, meaning those three people,

each one had a sickle on a basket.

When he was a Khmer, Mikhameh say,

there's no difference,

a Khachas ish mahal ish,

whether he's being harvested during the week or Shabis,

Bishal ish wash done by three people,

Bishal ish kupas, three baskets,

and Bishal ish mahal ish with three sickles.

So what I think Mikhameh Talsar-Bishmal ish,

because every Isar-Muhar-Bishal ish ish ish ish,

they hold the Nisar-in a fine choice flower,

could be made out of three-sav barley,

you can sift three-sav barley down to one Isar-in a fine flower.

And therefore, Vlushna-Bachal, Vlushna-Bashabis,

it doesn't make difference if it's being harvested

during week or Shabis,

we just harvest three-sav and sift down three-sav.

El-Rubishmal,

Kornubishmal, Mikhsa-Rubishmal,

Mikhsa-Rubishmal, what does he hold?

The e-Kasar-Rubishmal ish,

he holds the Isar-Muhar-Bishal ish al-Mikhameh,

the Nisar-in of the choicest finest flower,

is only able to be made from five-sav barley,

so I feel like Shabis-Nami,

so even on Shabis as well.

Five-sav should be harvested,

and Imi-sala-shawsi,

if we're able to make a Nisar-in a fine flower,

from three, I feel like al-Nami,

so even during the weekday,

three-sav should be fine,

and five-sav should have to be harvested.

So, I'm a rava, he answers,

Kornubishmal, Mikhsa-Rubishmal holds,

Isar-Muhar-Bilay-Tircha-Sim-Mikhameh,

the Nisar-in a fine flower,

without too much tear-cut,

challenge and difficulty,

that comes from five-sav,

because you have a lot more coarse flour to work with,

and so it takes much less effort sifting it,

in order to come out with a Nisar-in a fine flower,

whereas Bateer-cha-Asi-Mikhsa-Rush,

if you work hard, difficulty,

you're sifted over and over again,

you could still get a Nisar-in a fine flower,

from three-sav, and therefore,

Bichael-Masin-Mikhameh,

on a weekday, when there's no issue sifting,

so we bring five-sav flour.

Da khish-fikhameh al-Sav,

could actually, it's better that way.

It comes out with a little bit better flour,

when it's from five-sav,

whereas Bishabis,

muttershi-yarbe-bim-ul-ah-ah-ah-haz-bar-a-kado,

and al-yar-bim-ul-ah-haz-harbe-an-shabis,

it's better to increase one-mul-ah-ah-har-kado,

which is sifting,

as opposed to being mar-ba-many-other-mul-ah-haz,

because we're going to be harvesting five-sav-bar-li on-shabis,

so think about how many more-mul-ah-haz-harfs have to be done.

There's going to be harvesting and win-o-ing,

and selecting and grinding, and then sifting,

because it has to be done to the extra two-sav,

as opposed to just harvest three-sav-bar-li,

so in the only-mul-ah-har,

we're going to have to increase in is sifting,

we're going to have to sift it a little bit more

in order to get that fine flour,

because we're going to do that on-shabis,

as opposed to, again, being over-mul-ah-haz-harfs

in order to get just slightly finer flour.

We're going to stop for the day,

and pick up tomorrow and continue to discuss this.

For now, everyone should have a wonderful day.