Mega Edition: Jeffrey Epstein And The 'Original Sin' (3/15/26)

0:00¿Quién es mejor internet? Cox internet de 300 megas tiene las velocidades rápidas y confiables que buscas. Perfecto para streaming y gaming y trabajar desde casa. Todo por solo $45 dólares al mes cuando agregas CoxMobo. Incluye equipo de Wi-Fi y garantía de precio de dos años en tu plan. ¡Yeah! No esperes, ¡gambia te hoy a Cox! Requiere CoxMobo gigante de garantía de precio y incluye impuestos y cargos de velocidad de datos moviles se reduce después de 20 guías al mes. Y IUP grad school fits into my life. So I can keep working while I build my career. And you can too. They have everything from MBAs to doctoral degrees to specialized certificates all taught by nationally recognized professors. With 60 grad programs, I found one that fits my schedule. So find yours, either online, on campus, or a blend of both. Indiana University of Pennsylvania opens doors. Learn more at IUP.edu.

1:00And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. As you're all aware, we are at the Christmas break for the trial. So obviously there's nothing groundbreaking happening in the mornings or even in the evenings at this point. But that's okay because we're still going to be here adding some context. And we're going to do that today by talking about the Grand Jerry transcripts from Palm Beach. Now there was a lot of talk a few weeks ago that this judge was going to release these Grand Jerry transcripts. And that would have been a huge boost in the arm for transparency. We all know that whatever went on in that Grand Jerry room in 2006, it was not good. All right, whatever was going on in that Grand Jerry room based on that arrest was not up to par. And the fact that only one of those girls

2:01was able to give their story in front of the Grand Jerry tells you everything you need to know about the prosecutors and about the whole entire scenario that unfolded. This prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, the original prosecution, was legitimately one of the biggest travesties of justice perhaps ever. When you look at the grand scope of it all and you look at the disgusting nature of his crimes and the wake of misery he left, I mean, it's hard not to look at it like that. And the fact that Barry Cresher and the state prosecutor's office in Florida worked hand in hand with Dershowitz and Lefkowitz and the rest of Jeffrey Epstein's legal team to not only get him off, but to destroy his own witnesses,

3:03Barry Cresher's own witnesses, meaning these girls, is just unbelievable to me. And you have this judge down there in Palm Beach, you know, one of the good old boys, one of the binarown forever's, still mucking things up, still not interested in transparency. You would think after all these years and all of the scrutiny over the Jeffrey Epstein case that some of these judges would wise up by now. But like I always say, they think they're feudal lords and these courtrooms are their fiefdoms and they can do whatever they want. And these lifetime elected, lifetime appointed judges, bad news folks, talk about people who are power hungry, every now and then you'll run across one of these judges like this guy and you just shake your head. But there's been a lot of them when it comes to the Jeffrey Epstein case.

4:04A lot of these judges, a lot of these people in positions of power have failed these girls time and time again. And with this latest blow, this judge not going to release these transcripts, it's just another victory for the scumbags and just another hurdle in the way of those who are trying to bring those scumbags to justice. This morning we have an article from the Palm Beach Post and the author is Jane Musgrave. Was the Jeffrey Epstein case intentionally sunk? Judge won't, excuse me, Judge won't release secret grand jury papers. And again, it's just another blow to transparency, it's another blow to those of us who want the truth and it just again throws up another curtain over what everybody perceives at this point

5:04is government malfeasance. You would think that they'd want to expose that, right? You would think that they'd want to put that on blast but that's not how it works. They go on to cover your ass mode and they got to protect the other scumbags that they work with and it's just such a dog and pony show at this point. And the illusion that there's a fair justice system, the illusion that there isn't a two-tier justice system is being shattered on a regular basis at this point. Upon Beach County Circuit Judge on Monday refused to release secret documents that could explain why a 2006 grand jury indicted serial child molester Jeffrey Epstein on a single charge of prostitution despite evidence that showed he abused more than a dozen girls at his Palm Beach mansion. Now let that sink in. For those of you who aren't really completely up to date on the case, those of you who have had a life

6:06for the last three years, this might seem like what the hell are you talking about here? How is that even possible? But this is what they've been dealing with meaning the survivors from the beginning. Law enforcement has not been on their side. Law enforcement, in fact, a lot of the time has worked against them. And you see it here. Again, when you have this judge who makes the decision that these grand jury documents will not see the light of day as if it's some sort of national security issue where nobody should ever see those grand jury documents. Now I understand if there was a legitimate reason, a legitimate issue, keeping those documents from the public. But there's no legitimate reason. Unless, of course, you're trying to cover for somebody. Unless, of course, you're trying to protect your friends. In a 10 page order, Circuit Judge Donald Huffle rejected arguments

7:09by attorneys for the Palm Beach Post who pushed him to release the records, citing a rarely used state law that allows the secrecy of the grand jury to be pierced to further the interests of justice. And if this is in a case where that hits home, I don't know what is. These grand jury testimony should be only released. They shouldn't be hidden from the public for all of these years, especially if it moves the interests of justice and it certainly would considering the non-prossecution agreement is based on all of this. So to get rid of that non-prossecution agreement, wouldn't it stand her reason that having these grand jury documents released would go a long way to making that occur? While Huffle noted the newspaper offered strong arguments,

8:10he said he was bound by the state's law. The court rules against the newspaper because the established and binding maxims of Florida law can strain it to do so, halfly wrote, halfly wrote. And again, we know that that's not 100% the case. If it promotes the interest of justice as according to the state law in Florida, then the documents can be released. The transcripts can be released. But they don't have any interest in doing that. Him, the other judge that's involved in this, Crystal Marx, all of them had ties to Barry Krischer or other people involved in the case. That's how these things work with these bureaucrats. They're all friends. They're all going to the same company functions. And on and on and on it goes. We've discussed it a lot here on this podcast. You're not buying the lawyer for what they're going to do in the courtroom for the most part. You're paying for a lawyer for the connections they have outside of the courtroom, for the access they can get you to the prosecutor's office.

9:15Why do you think, in a situation like Maxwell's, she hires somebody like Christian Everdo? X prosecutor has a lock with the SDNY, knows all of the prosecutors. They're all probably chummy. They probably go to barbecues together. You know what I'm talking about. While state law allows the release of grand jury records to further the interest of justice, he said it is clear the legislature intended that exception to be used only in pending criminal or civil cases. So just because this happened a while back and now Epstein's dead, let's just forget it ever happened. We'll just move on. And you know what, it is what it is. Sorry, the girls who are victimized, no justice for them. It's basically what this judge is saying. And I mean, it shouldn't shock anybody considering what we see these judges do on a regular basis. From the bench here in America. But you would think that something like this with all of the interests surrounding it,

10:18all of the questions that still need to be answered, that if you were a judge, you'd say to yourself, you know what, in the interests of justice, in the interests of moving the truth forward, I'm going to release these transcripts. And that's what the law has put on the books for. But unfortunately, this judge didn't want to interpret it that way. Instead, the newspaper advocates a more expensive interpretation of the term. He wrote, the newspaper wants the ability to publish the materials and reference them in its reporting and also to make the materials available to the public. Yeah, that's how this works, judge, okay? The public is interested in a case that's probably one of the most corrupt of all time. So yeah, there is going to be a bit of hesitancy to trust you. There is going to be a bit of cynicism when it comes to court rulings. And the fact that you want to keep this stuff away from the public is just going to feed in to conspiracy theories and outlandish thoughts.

11:23The government plays a huge part in all of that. They could stem and stop a whole bunch of the conspiracy stuff with a whole lot of different topics if they just stop their bullshit. But they don't want to ever be transparent. They want to keep everything private, everything's a national security issue, isn't it? And that's what they'll say. Or if you're looking to get information about something say like Jeffrey Epstein's first alleged suicide attempt, what they'll say is the information is unavailable because it's still part of an ongoing investigation. And that ongoing investigation has to do with Tartaglione. So they'll just run you in circles as long as possible. And if somehow you do get some freedom of information, act information from them, it'll be heavily redacted or partial. You'll never get the full story. Like the newspapers, attorneys, Halfill said the transcripts could help answer

12:23troublesome questions about why the politically connected multi-millionaire, pedophile, escaped serious punishment. Some claim that then-state attorney Barry Krischer was improperly influenced by Epstein's high octane defense team. I agree with that. I definitely think he was. When you go back and you look at all of the documentation and you look at the reporting and you look at how things broke, it's very obvious that he wasn't working as an advocate for these survivors and neither was the prosecutor's office of Florida or a hell, the federal prosecutor's office either. Because remember, while Acosta was the one who was the direction man, right? The guy who was considered the quote unquote boss on the ground, he had people to answer to as well. He's just a mid-level bureaucrat. He don't make decisions like this. He had to kick that up the chain to Mucasey and the rest of them. So they all failed from the top down, from the federal government all the way down to the state.

13:26And now all the way back to this judge, absolute failures, a top of absolute failures. It may very well be that the disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein's grand jury records could reveal the fair treatment did not occur. And that Mr. Epstein might have escaped appropriate punishment through some failing of our justice system. Halfall said, yeah, well, how about releasing the documents then? Instead, you'll just sit on them, right? Like a dragon hoarding its gold. Post hasn't decided whether to appeal, but he said state law can't be ignored on a whim or to satisfy the public's curiosity. The court's interpretation of the scope of the state law end of the phrase further injustice is governed and constrained by the established rules of statutory construction, half, halfly wrote. Attorneys for the post said they were reviewing the order and had not yet decided whether to appeal.

14:27I really hope they do. I mean, I know it's an extra cost on them to appeal stuff like this. And the attorney fees get to be a bit excessive, but you would think that in the interest of justice, in the interest of transparency, that they would release this documentation. And really what it comes down to is this judge's interpretation of the law. That's all it is. But he said state law can't be ignored on a whim or to satisfy the public's curiosity. In a statement, a comptroller and clerk of the court's Joe Abruzzo said that while he, while he hired a top media lawyer to represent his office in the lawsuit, he wasn't against the newspaper's request. While Florida statute is clear on its prohibition of releasing information from grand jury cases, I want to be clear that I have absolutely no objection to releasing grand jury information in the Epstein case

15:29if directed by the court, Abruzzo said. So what the comptroller's saying, look, I'll release this information, but I have to be directed to do so by the court. That's the only way that I can release this. And once again, it goes back to the judges. These guys running around like their Taiwan Lannister in the courtroom. He hired Shane Voit, a Tampa attorney who won a $140 million verdict against Gauker on behalf of retired professional wrestler, Hulk Hogan. And as represented others in fights against news outlets to represent the office. During a hearing on October 22nd, Voit argued that if half-full approved the newspaper's request, it would open the floodgates for others to do the same. Well, so what? Open the floodgates. And then on a case-by-case basis, decide what should or what shouldn't be released. Why is that so difficult? Oh, is it going to cause extra work for the clerks? God forbid. I mean, are we supposed to just slow everything down?

16:34And, you know, ah, well, let's wait on things here because we don't have enough time or enough people. I don't even understand when he says, I don't even understand what any of it means, the floodgates will open. Well, if they're legitimate requests, then maybe the floodgates need to be opened. Half-full said he could craft the narrow order that would assure the clerk wouldn't be inundated with demands for grand jury records. Still, he said after reviewing the law, he determined the documents must remain secret. State Attorney Dave Aaron Berg declined to comment on half-on-half-full's decision. While the paper initially named him in the lawsuit, he was dropped after he claimed he didn't have the records. Executives of the newspaper, which is owned by Gannett Company, said they were disappointed by half-full's decision. Yeah, you would think so, right? As a newspaper organization, the idea is to get as much information to the public as possible.

17:35Let the public decide. And what a better way to do that than to provide raw data such as transcripts. I don't need the middleman, right? Provide us with the transcripts. Provide us with the information that we need and let us decide what's going on here as the public. But no, they'll keep everything hidden and then what he'll do is he'll cite some obscure law here. Oh, well, it'll cause a flood of other requests and all of it is nonsense. Whenever I hear any of this stuff, all I hear is no, we don't want to be transparent. No, you can't know the truth. That's basically what I hear every time they start in on the nonsense. While the post appreciates the court's consideration of the issues, we respectfully disagree with the legal conclusion that public access to the Epstein Grand Jury Materials is not warranted under the circumstances. Said Marable Perez-Wadsworth, President of Gannett News, USA Today Network,

18:35and publisher of USA Today, it is our right and responsibility to report all aspects of this case, and we will continue to diligently seek the facts in our pursuit of transparency. Can't argue with that and props to them for doing it. I mean, is it too much to ask to have some transparency or as the public to have the proper information in a case that is so important? Post-executive editor Rich Christie echoed those sentiments. For 16 years, the post has been driven to report on the heinous acts of Jeffrey Epstein for two reasons. Justice for the victimized girls and accountability for our readers, he said. Today's ruling by circuit judge, Huffle, while disappointing, does not deter us from our mission of furthering justice for Epstein's young victims. The post will always fight to shine a spotlight, wherever it is needed to expose the actions

19:36or inactions of those charged with serving and protecting the public, period he concluded. Hey, I'll tell you what, I'm all for that. And I'll be right here with you right in shotgun as far as trying to get these transcripts because it's a big deal. It's a huge deal. And I can't express enough how important that non-prosecution agreement is in protecting these people still. And all of this plays such a huge part in that. The ruling was a blow to efforts to unravel the sorted case that grabbed international attention. It also came on a day that a federal jury in New York began deliberating whether Epstein's longtime girlfriend, co-conspirator, Galen Maxwell, recruited and groomed teens for his pleasure. The 59-year-old British socialite, co-conspirator general all around Scuzzbad by Pedal Serpent, faces a lengthy prison term if convicted of multiple charges in connection with the sex trafficking scheme.

20:38During the October hearing, the newspaper's attorneys argued that the case was unique. More than 15 years has passed. Epstein is dead, so none of the information can be used against him. The 66-year-old financier, pedophile, who counted former President Bill Clinton and Britain's Prince Andrew as friends hung himself, allegedly, in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019, while a waiting trial on dozens of sex trafficking charges in New York. Again, he's dead. None of this information can be used against him or anything like that, so I don't understand how it won't be released. Now, look, if he was still alive, and there was a chance that this information could be used, or, all right, I get it, I might not agree with it, but I get it. I don't agree with it, and I don't get it in this instance. The guy is dead, he's rotting, it's time for transparency. A dozen girls said they were sexually abused,

21:38only one testified. As part of a 2019 investigation, titled The First Failure, sources familiar with the grand jury proceedings told the Post that while more than a dozen teens told Palm Beach Police that Epstein molested them, only one, a 14-year-old girl was called to testify. And this is what I talk about, a lot in reference, how only one girl was called to give testimony, and how it flashes shades to what we saw here in the Maxwell trial, with only four girls being called. While I understand the scopes a little bit different, it's just for those of us who have been through this already, it's concerning to see. The sources said there's top lieutenants vilified the teen, instead of focusing on the abuse she suffered at the hands of the wealthy pedophile, they quizzed her about her social media activity, which included references to boys and drinking. Her posts on our MySpace page were given a cursor

22:39by Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz, one of Epstein's top flight attorneys. And that was the strategy then, it's the strategy now, and it'll continue to be the strategy until these juries wake up and start convicting these people. We all know that the girls were absolutely destroyed by not only the authorities, but by Epstein's attorneys. Oh, they were talking to boys, they were smoking weed, they drank on their MySpace page. Really? Let me ask you, how many of you out there as young teenagers didn't do any of those things? I know we all did, I know I did. If you're gonna base my life on what I did as a young man, then boy, I'll tell you, I'd be in big trouble. Her alleged treatment by state prosecutors could explain why grand jurors indicted Epstein on the lone prostitution charge, instead of multiple counts of child molestation that were sought by the police.

23:43The prostitution charge ignored the tender age of Epstein's accusers, and the fact that teens under the age of 18 couldn't legally consent to sex. We've talked about that from the jump, too. How can you even call a girl under 18 a prostitute when they can't even consent to sex? How is that even logical? Legal experts say prosecutors will tremendous influence over grand jurors who weren't skilled in the law. Sidentically, some embrace a time-honored maxim that a prosecutor, if he desired, could indict a ham sandwich. And this is a fact, as well. You know, the grand jury rooms are places where indictments definitely come down at a huge swell. The statement, you get a ham sandwich indicted at a grand jury, certainly rings true, because it's something that a lot of people talk about who are in the know. After his death, scores of young women

24:43came forward publicly describing how Epstein sexually assaulted them. At his home in Palm Beach, his penthouse apartment in Manhattan, his ranch in New Mexico, and his private island in the Virgin Islands. Some said he forced them to have sex with his celebrity friends, while aboard his private jet, the Lolita Express. Many teen victims were from Palm Beach County. Like teens from Royal Palm Beach, and John I Leonard High Schools, many were alert to Epstein's homes with the promise of being paid $200 to give him a massage. He greeted them wearing little more than a towel. He offered to pay them, more to disrobe, let them fondle them, and to have sex. Boy, what does that all sound like? Sounds like a bunch of testimony we just heard, doesn't it? Imagine this testimony mirrors that testimony, and if they would have actually done their job, during this first arrest, and had more than one of the victims give their testimony to the grand jury, a lot of this could have been stopped, perhaps.

25:44The girls, some from hard-scrabble backgrounds, were promised careers in high fashion, college educations, or other perks that were beyond their reach. The grand jury marked the beginning of when the case spun out of control. Angry at Christchurch handling at his agency's investigation, angry at Christchurch handling of his agency's investigation, Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Ryder went to the FBI. Ultimately, in a secret deal, South Florida attorney, Alex Acosta agreed to shelve a 53-page federal indictment against Epstein, if he would plead guilty to state prostitution charges. And now remember, it's not just Acosta here. He's the scumbag with no spine, no doubt about it, and he deserves his infamy for his role. But he wasn't the one who made the decision. He might have been the one who, you know, filed it up the chain of command, but he didn't know. Okay. That's for sure.

26:44As part of the so-called non-prosecution agreement, Christchurch added a charge of solicitation of a minor for prostitution. Federal prosecutors insisted on the second charge, because it would force Epstein to register as a sex offender. How that worked out in New Mexico. Oh, that's right. He didn't have to register there. Because he knew. He planned all of this. He took precautions. On June 30, 2008, Epstein pleaded guilty and Palm Beach County Circuit Court to both prostitution charges. He served 13 months of an 18-month sentence in a largely vacant wing of the County Stockade. He was given liberal work-release privileges. He was allowed to spend up to 12 hours a day, six days a week, working at a private foundation he created months earlier. The fallout from what one state prosecutor described as the deal of the century was far reaching, if delayed. And not only was Epstein out,

27:44according to some of these other accusers, he was abusing them while he was out on this work-release program. Fantastic job done by the federal government, huh? Fantastic job done by the Florida state authorities. After Epstein was charged in New York, a costa resigned as former president Donald Trump's labor secretary when questions were raised about his involvement in crafting the non-prosecution agreement. Before his resignation, a costa sought to blame Chrisher. He claimed he was forced to clean up a mess Chrisher created when the state prosecutor refused to file serious charges against Epstein. A costa pointed out that Chrisher originally offered to allow Epstein to plead guilty to aggravated assault. Serve no jail time and have the felony record erased as a result of his probation. That was unacceptable to a costa said during a nationally televised news conference. So basically, it's a a poinum game, right? You did it.

28:44I did it. He did it. She did it. And in reality, what they do is they cause enough confusion then that nobody's held responsible. Chrisher responded that a costa was attempting to rewrite history in a prepared statement he said, I can emphatically state that Mr. Acosta's recollection of this matter is completely wrong. A federal investigation in 2020 found that a costa placed too much trust in Chrisher. A two-year state investigation completed last year, concluded that Chrisher had little input into the prosecution agreement and found no wrong doing. State investigators were denied access to the grand jury proceedings. So not only as the public locked out, they locked out the state investigators who were investigating wrongdoing here in the FDLE report. Yeah, nothing, nothing to see here, folks. Keep on moving. Everything is just fine. We're all fine.

29:46After Epstein died, authorities in the U.S. Virgin Islands worked with those who were administering his estate to set up a fund to compensate his victims. They wrapped up their work in August after paying slightly more than $121 million to more than $135 people according to the New York Times. Look, this is a situation that, obviously, as you can tell here, has been going on for quite some time. And there was hope that this judge was going to release these grand jury documents. Well, that's not going to occur. So the battle continues for transparency, folks. And we'll continue to report on it. And we'll continue to talk about it until there's some movement. And we finally get a glimpse behind the curtain. All right, folks, that's going to do it for me today. And I'll be back later on, obviously, with a evening update. And expect some more context episodes as well. If you'd like to contact

30:46me, you can do that at bobbykapucci at protonmail.com. That's B-O-B-B-Y-C-A-P-U-C-C-C-I at protonmail.com. You can also find me on Twitter at B-O-B-B-Y-U-C-A-P-U-C-C-I. The link that we discussed can be found in the description box. What's up, everyone? And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the biggest forces in the history of forces is the fact that Jeffrey Epstein received that sweetheart deal that he received. That should have never happened. It should have never went down. And everybody involved in that sweetheart deal should lose their pensions. Should not have a job working for the federal government. And should be looked at for perhaps even losing their law licence. And I truly mean that when I say it. That's how big of a travesty this was. To think that any prosecutor anywhere in the country would give this guy this kind of deal

31:46is just beyond me. And then for the court system, the government para decir que no es una base legal para invalidar la parte de su hígrafa, es incluso más absurd. Así que lo que te digo es que hay no lejos para poner en si algo es correcto en el legal sistema, tenemos que hablar con él. Se parece que cada vez que algo es lo que sea en el legal sistema, siempre ends el favor de la gobierno federal, nunca en el favor de las personas. Y, once again, estamos viendo eso aquí, así que lo que te digo es que tu

32:51federal prosecutors, decir que hay no legal bases para invalidar, Jeffery Epstein, sweetheart, del. Pues, si, si, eso necesita ser looked a eso, entonces, si necesitas ir con una nueva solución aquí, donde en el futuro, si es una parte de esto es Given, un panel puede ser colocado y el panel puede ir a ver. Y decir, ¿qué? Esto no es una parte de la que estamos constable con esto. Porque esto es unacceptable y no puede suceder otra vez. El Departamento de Justice en el mundo, rejecido a fórmese por los servidores de Jeffery Epstein, para llegar a un sueño en un prostecucio, así que el prostecucio puede ser secundado por un abuso de abuso de tantos de años. Ahora, imagínate en el judge, quien deniva esto. En un 35-page de la opción, primero reportado por el Miami Herald, federal prosecutors claim that Jeffrey Epstein survivors have no legal basis to invalidate the non prosecution agreement the same agreement the judge in the case previously said broke the law

33:54so you see what's going on here you have judges saying that this agreement broke the law then you have a court saying oh well no there's no recourse here for this because there's nothing that was invalid so they can't even figure it out as far as the legal system itself what's right or wrong here and then they expect us just to stomach it and suck it down and be okay with it no way there is no chance that this legal agreement should have stood there is no chance that it should stand at all and in fact it's ridiculous that anyone would refer to this and try and use it as a defense as we found out in the previous article it holds no water unless you're down in florida many of Epstein survivors were middle school and high school girls between the ages of 13 and 16 who were recruited from the local south florida area according to prosecutors despite a judge's earlier ruling that the plea deal violated the crime victims

34:55rights act Epstein survivors cannot demand that the government take any additional action because the CVRA did not enumerate any mandatory criminal penalties at the time of its passing so basically what they're doing is you using legal ease loopholes and technicalities in the law itself that the congress that you know congress passed that congress wrote to get their buddies off once again and this is how they do it right they put these loopholes in these technicalities in these laws that you or I would never be able to exploit because we don't have the money we don't have the legal power in the backing to really go toe-to-toe with the federal government but somebody like Jeffrey Epstein or going Maxwell they certainly do and when you have those resources well the world is your oyster and monday's DOJ filing by attorney biong pack who is appointed by president donald trump the government admits that the survivors were treated unfairly but says that prosecutors were within their rights to do so

35:57real nice by biong pack huh hell of a guy hell of a uh... attorney here i mean this guy's defending just think about this for a minute ok folks this man is defending this prosecution agreement all because he doesn't want the government to have some dirt on their face instead of just admitting that this is this deal was bad it was garbage and the government should the bed they'll fight it to the very end well at the same time telling you all we're looking for justice for these survivors yeah right in the filing federal federal prosecutors did can see that the u.s. attorney's office in south florida failed to treat Epstein survivors most of whom were thirteen to sixteen years old when when they were abused fairly but they said the law gives prosecutors discretion in deciding how to dispose of a case survivors have a right to confer with prosecutors but no rights beyond that so basically let's just re-victimize these people

36:58and let's make it so nobody wants to come forward ever again because there's no justice also i come forward and then what happens these people are protected by their non prosecution agreement then they can hire their private investigators to come bother me again like they did all of the people involved let me be very clear with you if i walk out of my home and anyone's rummaging through my trash we're gonna have a big problem if i'm sitting in the street and somebody's following me around and you don't have a badge once again we're gonna have a big problem these people have gone way too comfortable thinking that they can bully people they have gone way too comfortable thinking that when they walk in the room they're the only ones with big dick energy but the reality is people have had enough and just normal average everyday folks like you are the backbone of that and if they think that we're gonna stop demanding justice here or for other victims of violent crimes

38:00they are sorely mistaken pack also warn the judge overseeing the case Kenneth mara against taking action to overrule a cost as original decision not to prosecute prosecute Epstein so who's this young pot guy and why is he out here trying to defend Jeffrey Epstein pretty interesting right wasn't that one of bill bars guys oh it was wasn't it good old dark bar one of the most unreliable untrustworthy people to ever plant their lazy do nothing asses and washington dc courts are not to interfere with the free exercise of the discretionary powers of the united states attorneys in their control over criminal prosecutions poxett the decision whether to prosecute Epstein lies solely within executive within the executive branch and any order today by this court as to what the government must do in the future would be wholly inappropriate so that just gives you a little bit of an idea of how the justice department

39:03has felt about Epstein and these survivors throughout time and it doesn't matter who the president is every single one of these attorney generals has been an impediment for justice going all the way back to clinton we're talking since clinton that's how many presidents Jeffrey Epstein has been active under and how many attorney generals stepped up and did something about it so i don't want to hear anything about how you know bill bar was appointed by donald trump to get rid of human trafficking that's a bunch of bullshit meet the new boss same as the old boss over and over again on repeat the herald didn't know however that paxett Epstein survivors would be given the chance to meet with prosecutors in private and if they desired to be heard out of public hearing he also said he would agree to give federal prosecutors additional training on dealing with survivors of crimes of this nature basically just you know shoving it under the rug and this is why i've been so critical of the department of justice of the FBI and their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein

40:07criminal enterprise and for all the people out there that want to continuously play politics about about this folks i hate to tell you how much more evidence do you need to see that it's both sides of the aisle here that have you know chips in the game they don't want this to be out there they don't want the whole entire scope of what Epstein was up to to be released to the public because it's going to be damning for all of these people as previously reported by law and crime the controversy surrounding Epstein's plea deal dates back to two thousand and seven when federal prosecutors in florida under the leadership of current u.s secretary of labor Alexander Acosta who was then the u.s attorney of the uh for the southern district of florida Acosta's prosecutors quietly entered to a secretive non prosecution agreement with the billionaire pedophile which ensured that Epstein and his go conspirators would not be prosecuted federally in exchange for Epstein's guilty plea to much less serious state

41:07prostitution charges Epstein served only 13 months in a county jail and the prostitution uh prostitution charges were made up you see folks you can't have a prostitute who's under age right so how do you have prostitution charges at all it was child molestation child grooming and child trafficking point blank period additionally Acosta's deal is insured that Epstein's go conspirators were all shielded from prosecution under what is now viewed as an extraordinarily unprecedented agreement and was followed by the FBI is ongoing probe being shut down so the probe was shut down too by the way imagine you're one of these FBI agents who's working on this and some jerk off suit bureaucrat walks in and says well that's a rap boy shut it all down and again that's why my criticism is mainly directed at the bureaucrats of the FBI folks please don't get that confused the rank and file agents that are

42:08out there doing their job i don't have any beef with them people are out there doing their job i get it my problem is with the bureaucrats out here playing games they'll act like they don't give a damn about what's going on here but god forbid you get on the wrong side of them politically and they're going to come after you full bore jack scarola a former prosecutor representing one of Epstein's survivors told the herald that a prosecutor's discretion in granting plea deals while broad is far from unlimited he specifically noted that a defendant's victims have the right to appeal a plea deal at sentencing this was not the case here as Epstein and a costus office reached their plea deal without conferring with any of Epstein's survivors and then you wonder why people again are saying this deal was corrupt the whole thing is garbage it's all gross well this is why and that's why we're going back and going over some of these articles and laying the groundwork again you know that stupid ass article from npr

43:08talking about conspiracy theories when they should be digging into what went on here really launched me into orbit and sent your boy on uh basically a crusade where we're going to go back and cover all of this again for all of the new listeners all of the people who might not have heard it the first time around and with a fresh eye because if there's anything that's absurd here if there's anything that's disgusting it's a sweetheart deal courts reject plea deals when they find them to be unjustifiable and unreasonable especially if they are not told the full scope of the agreement sclerola said he also said separately that congress did not contemplate the extraordinary circumstances of this conspiracy between the government and a serial child molester i disagree with that i'm sure they did and they don't care point blank how many times of has the government hopped into bed with some disgusting animal sclerola previously predicted the Epstein deal would be revoked

44:12paq who took over Epstein's case in March was joined in submitting monday's brief by u.s attorney Jill e steinberg and Nathan p kitchens once again folks you see what's going on here you see that this is absurd and you see why people are fired up about it yet we have no answers we don't have any allies in congress do we have any allies in congress or the senate that want justice here we sure do not nobody calling for hearings nobody calling for subpoenas nobody getting their phone record seized not a damn thing and the band just plays on so it's left to us to continue to demand justice and the best way to do that the best way to get people to act when they're being inactive is to embarrass them so that's what we'll continue to do we'll shine a spotlight on the piss poor job done by the department of justice until they get off their do nothing asses and get some justice i folks it's going to do it for this episode if you like to contact me you can do

45:14that at bobby kapucci at proton mel dot com that's b o b b y c a p u c c i at proton mel dot com you can also find me on twitter at b o b b y underscore c a p u c c c i the link that i discussed can be found in the description box