
Justin Clarke-Doane | Mathematics, Reality, and Morality
About this episode
Justin Clarke-Doane is a professor of philosophy at Columbia University, whose interests span metaethics, epistemology, and the philosophy of logic & mathematics.
In this thought provoking-discussion, Justin and I go deep into topics that are typically neglected by most mathematicians and scientists, namely the philosophy of mathematics and morality. Justin has contributed to both these areas via his book Morality and Mathematics, which takes the view that the standard position of being both a mathematical realist and moral antirealist is incoherent. Perhaps the most novel aspect of Justin's work is the treatment of the philosophy of mathematics and morality side-by-side, showing how these two topics, which are usually thought of as being unrelated, in fact have strong analogies. Along the way, we discuss many other foundational topics in epistemology and ethics, with elements of set theory, metaphysics, and logic sprinkled in.
Patreon (bonus materials + video chat): https://www.patreon.com/timothynguyen
Part I. Introduction
- 00:00 : Preview
- 01:56 : Naturalism & Mathematical vs Moral Realism
- 05:34 : Outline of the Discussion
Part II. Philosophy of Mathematics
- 13:25 : Mathematical Realism
- 18:36 : The Reality of Numbers
- 27:58 : Anti-Realist Positions in Mathematics
- 41:49 : Fictionalism in Mathematics
- 44:06 : Distinguishing Metaphysics from Epistemology
- 45:39 : The Role of Naturalism and Fictionalism
Part III. Philosophy of Morality (vs Mathematics)
- 50:24 : Moral Realism and Anti-Realism
- 58:31 : Analogies Between Mathematical and Moral Realism
- 01:05:30 : Kant's Constructivism and Ethical Contextualism
- 01:10:40 : Error Theory in Ethics
- 01:16:02 : Mathematical Realism and Moral Anti-Realism
- 01:17:22 : Contextualism and Moral Realism
Part IV. Select Topics from Justin's Book
- 01:19:11 : Justification and Self-Evidence
- 01:21:24 : The Practice of Axiomatization: Mathematics vs Ethics
- 01:24:51 : Pushback: Is there really controversy in math?
- 01:30:24 : Justification and Belief: Quinean Empiricism and Harman's Thesis
- 01:41:44 : Observations, Explanations, and Moral Facts
- 01:48:41 : Supervenience and High-Level Descriptions
- 02:00:43 : Justification vs Truth: Reliability Challenge in Mathematics and Morality
- 02:03:53 : 2+2 not equaling 4: Accidental Truth vs Truth per se
- 02:13:10 : Pluralism in Mathematics and Ethics
- 02:31:27 : Concluding Thoughts
- 02:32:49 : Correction: "relativism" should be "realism"
Further reading: Justin Clarke-Doane. Morality and Mathematics.
X: @iamtimnguyen
Webpage: http://www.timothynguyen.org
Get every episode summarized
Each time The Cartesian Cafe publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from The Cartesian Cafe

Jay McClelland | Neural Networks: Artificial and Biological
The Cartesian Cafe

Michael Freedman | A Fields Medalist Panorama
The Cartesian Cafe

Marcus Hutter | Universal Artificial Intelligence and Solomonoff Induction
The Cartesian Cafe

Richard Borcherds | Monstrous Moonshine: From Group Theory to String Theory
The Cartesian Cafe