About this episode
Unleashed: The Political News Hour with Nate Cain – The rot I saw inside power was not theory. It was paper trails, wire transfers, and deliberate silence. I watched an investigation into foreign access to our uranium supply get narrowed and kneecapped. I saw analysts map money moving through shell companies and foundations until it landed where it should never have gone...Get every episode summarized
Each time America Out Loud News publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
723 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
America Out Loud News — Inside America’s hidden scandals: Nate Cain reports. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
In this political Coliseum, we slay the rising beast with the fateful sword of truth that transcends hypocrisy and censorship. It's time to unleash yourself from the tyrants of media propaganda on the America out loud talk radio network. This is unleashed the political news out. Welcome to Unleashed the political news hour. I'm Nate Kane, your host and there's so much to talk about that has been going on. I want to get into a couple of things right off the bat as everybody has probably heard Robert Mueller has passed away. While there are plenty of things that people may have to say about him in his involvement in the Trump-Russia collusion and all of that, I really don't have anything to say about
the man in the last few years of his life. I think honestly that there was an elder abuse what was going on it was clear by the end of the investigation into Trump-Russia collusion that he was not all there and was likely suffering from some form of dementia or at least had lapses of sharpness. But that said, I want to just reiterate and remind folks that I was the uranium-1 whistleblower that exposed the FBI's cover-up of Hillary Clinton's crimes related to money laundering, public corruption, securities and exchange fraud and terrorism financing. What that all entailed in fact the whistleblower complaint was primarily about a few people. One of them and the number one person was in fact Robert Mueller. It also included a complaint against James Comey and also included Andrew McCabe.
Why? Because those three men were working for the Bureau at the time that uranium-1 was being investigated. There was a company called Rossetom, a Russian energy company that was involved in trying to basically gain access to our uranium supply chain in this country and they were doing it illegally. They were basically bribing people and paying kickbacks in order to gain access to yellow cake uranium transportation. This was known by the FBI. This was knowledge that they had. They had all the evidence on it. There was an intelligence report that showed that they had all of this where they were monitoring these Russian agents and there was another whistleblower at the time who shortly before I became a whistleblower who was a FBI informant that was providing information to the FBI on all
of these transactions and all of these guys. Ultimately, they left that guy out to dry as they did with me. What happened though was I was working for the Bureau and I saw that this was basically was going on and was being talked about and they were investigating Hillary Clinton for her email server scandal and all of that. Somebody came up to me or somebody I overheard a conversation I should say in my office at the Bureau that they had seen a transcript of a conversation that involved senior leadership at the FBI. This will be Comey and Andrew McCabe and others talking about how they were going to essentially shut down investigations that were going on in Hillary Clinton and it was purely being done for political reasons. They were afraid of retribution from her and they believed that she was going to be the next president. Basically, we're going to ignore her crimes which were national security matters.
Like I said, there had already been an intelligence assessment saying that they saw a high probability of public corruption, securities and exchange fraud, money laundering, terrorism, financing. I didn't believe it at first but I decided to go look and I sure enough I found all this evidence that the FBI had. This was just hundreds and hundreds of pages of suspicious activity reports that had already been analyzed by FBI analysts that had mapped out the entire money trail, money coming from foreign countries, many of which are not our friends, moving money through various foundations and ultimately ending up in the Clinton Foundation. Money going from there, going out through various shell corporations and banks and overseas bank accounts and ending up in the bank account of the head spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood.
There was a lot that was being investigated by the FBI that was in my opinion quite treasonous. They basically blew that off and completely ignored it. I made a very difficult decision to walk out of the FBI with 458 pages of classified documents and take them to the intelligence community to basically the House and Senate Intelligence committees. That process took me about a year. I went through the DOJ IG, which was Michael Horowitz, interestingly enough. He's the only IG that Trump kept, even though he was appointed by Democrats, Trump kept him. I think that's because he was a man of integrity, even when I came to him, he went out of his way to ensure that those documents made it into the hands of Congress.
Unfortunately, Congress did nothing with it. Even though these had been verified by Horowitz. That is what I remember about Robert Mueller. Now we see that James Comey has been subpoenaed in a grand jury conspiracy case surrounding the conspiracy against Trump. This doesn't always find a way in the way that we think, but it does eventually come. I know that regardless, and I don't have any comments whatsoever about anything personal about Mueller or about Comey. I don't know if these men were just cowards or if they were truly corrupt and somehow involved in making money off of this. I don't know. I'm not speculating in that area. All I can tell you is what I know, which is that they obstructed justice for political
reasons. In my opinion, they should have been brought up on charges and they should have gone to prison for it, along with Hillary Clinton and those who, and here's the things, folks. It's one thing, Hillary Clinton being investigated. She deserves her day in court, just like everybody else. In this case, I happen to know for a fact what these guys did. They covered it up and that has been, of course, has come out now and been proven. John Durham's report on page 78, if any of you guys want to go look, covers why they were covering things up and what they were shutting down, and basically they were afraid of retribution, which is exactly what I had claimed in my report. That's cowardice, and it's also criminal for those that are in that position of public trust. As far as I'm concerned, there's too many of these elites that can commit crimes in this
country and get away with it and this is shame. I hope that there will be some justice, and I know that there's always justice in the after life, so I hope that Robert Mueller found peace with God and repented of his sense. And I certainly, I hope that there will be justice for the rest of those scoundrels that basically perverted justice at the highest levels of our country. That said, folks, there's a lot going on and we've got a couple of really great guests. We're going to be talking about California and what the Department of Health knew, and basically their ignoring of the evidence that was showing that people were dying and their ignoring of the evidence that Ivermectin could have helped. I have a whistleblower that's coming on. That's going to be a great conversation with him.
Then we're going to be talking about, in the third segment, we're going to be talking on another guest and we'll be talking about basically what Andrew Breitbart had said, which is that politics is downstream from culture, and so we've got to look at what is upstream from culture if we want to have any change on our culture and ultimately have a change in our politics. That is about all we have time for in this segment, folks, stick with us through the commercial break. We will be right back. Remember, this is unleashed the political news hour where we tell the truth that other people don't want to talk about. We will be right back after a short break. We'll get ready, my fellow Americans, July 2nd, 3rd and 4th, America Out Loud.News in partnership with Clear and the Wellness Company invites you to Nashville, Tennessee for a red, white and blue celebration you'll never forget.
We're saluted 250 years of America and 10 incredible years of America Out Loud news, stand in strong, for truth, justice, and the nation we all love. Three days of high impact speakers, powerhouse voices, delivering dynamic, unforgettable insights that will fire up your Patriot Spirit. And on July 4th, embrace yourself because you'll experience America's most explosive fireworks show, lighten up downtown Nashville and pure patriotic glory. You can reserve your spot with early bird pricing right now at america out loud.news forward slash Nashville. It's America out loud news, 250 10 and Nashville, even. Feeling off since COVID, try the wellness company Spike Detox Trio, packed with natto kinase, bromelain, and turmeric to help boost your immune system and fight off harmful spike proteins. Bounce back with energy and clarity. Go to TWC dot hell forward slash out loud and use promo code out loud for 20% off your
first order. You wouldn't go a day without brushing your teeth or washing your hands, what about washing your nose? I mean your nose does filter the air you breathe, air loaded with bacteria, viruses, and irritants. Make nasal hygiene part of your routine with Clear. No messy bottles to fill, no drowning sensation. There's a natural drug free saline with the added benefit of xylitol, which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion, available in stores and online at clear dot com. That is XLEAR dot com. Welcome back to Unleash the political news hour. We now enter our second segment with a compelling conversation featuring Ronald F Owens, Jr. Who served with distinction as an information officer at the California Department of Public Health from March 2009 through December of 2023. During his tenure, particularly amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Mr Owens gained firsthand insight
into internal operations and decision making processes that profoundly shaped public health policy. He has since emerged as a whistleblower, documenting his experiences and observations in his book Muscle Truth, How the California Department of Public Health rejected COVID-19 treatment and vaccine health risk warnings. In this discussion, we are going to explore the revelations that he presents regarding the handling of COVID-19, the information allegedly suppressing the sorry alleged suppression of concerns and the broader implications for public trust in health institutions. Mr Owens, thank you so much for joining us. Please begin by sharing your key findings from your time at CDPH. Well, thank you Nate for allowing me to share my whistleblower story.
When I came to the California Department of Public Health on March 2nd 2009, when I first walked through the doors, I did not know that my professional career would have resulted in me witnessing the suppression of injury-sparing life-saving information to 40 million Californians and beyond. I say that beyond because what happens in California has a national, indeed, an international reverberation. So, say, for example, if senior leadership at the California Department of Public Health would have at least investigated and come to the conclusion that properly-dosed aramectin can treat and cure COVID, just think how many other state health departments would have followed CDPH, but that did not happen.
When I informed my management in October of 2021 that properly-dosed aramectin can cure COVID, essentially, they said this is not our job to approve treatment, that's the job of the FDA. Wow. You know, and the crazy thing about this, Robert, is that for a very long time, doctors have had the ability to be able to use medications off-label for things that they were clinically seeing that were helping, and in this case, I believe that all of this, not just in your state, but in multiple states around the country, where they saw evidence that aramectin was helpful, or hydroxychloroquine was helpful, as a prophylactic, they basically ignored it due to trumped arrangement syndrome, that's the only thing I can add up to it. Well, we can speculate about the motivations why the powers that be here in the Golden
State and California didn't take my advice. Number one, they said, Ronald Liffin was junior, you're not a doctor. So no, there was to stay in your place. My job as a public information officer is to work with doctors, and I'm reasonably intelligent, and I'm not the smartest person on the planet, I realize that, but, you know, I did go to college. I had worked as a public information officer for the off-the-mergency services for the Department of Motor Vehicles, for the California Community College of Chancellor's Office in my career. So I'm reasonably intelligent, learning how to read, and how to look at information and data, and ascertain that, hey, this is a pretty good treatment option. And I think that one of the reasons why senior leadership did not want to take this information
and use it for the benefit of Californians, is because it would have been contrary to the mantra that vaccines are safe and effective. They were more focused on vaccines than any other treatment. If I can say, look, we have this bureaucrats here at CDPH who have medical doctors, I respect that. They went to med school, they jumped through hoops, but I cited information in October of 2021 that Dr. Pierre Corey said, look, I treated more than 8,000 people with properly dozed aramectin. I mean, what kind of, I mean, that's great news. Yeah. Yeah. And, but yet, there, I'm talking about management response to me was, you're an out of doctor. Is there focusing on the messenger rather than the gig message?
Well, to be honest with you, it doesn't matter because there were doctors who were citing this. In fact, you had doctors who were directly involved in the creation of mRNA, for example, that said, hey, this is not a good idea. And what, what blows my mind is how there was evidence, I'm all for evidence-based medicine, but there was plenty of evidence that these vaccines were not preventing the spread of the disease because they were not vaccines. They were essentially gene therapy. And there was also evidence that there were some serious side effects for many people, including deaths. Now tell me about what you saw in regards to the evidence with regards to how people were reacting to these vaccines. And at what point did you approach them and say, hey, we've got a problem here.
And what was their response? Well, I had been hearing, listening to various doctors who were censored, de-platformed, their medical relicings revoked. I know this one doctor who used to live in California, she moved to the Midwest. They sent two armed guards from the State Department that monitors or oversees or regulates doctors licenses. They sent two armed guards to her house. So in a way, I had been listening to these kind of physicians who were basically touting Arbomectan and other treatment options and were warning us that these COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous. And so Nate, I came across this information on April 14, 2022, one of the social media platforms called Telegram.
I used to go there just to collect information, see what's going on. Because at this point, I didn't trust anything from the mainstream media, whether it be Fox on the right or CNN on the left or in between. So I discovered on April 14, 2022, the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, he was Sarah said, this regarding the COVID-19 vaccines, he was appearing on a White House convening on equity summit, and he said, quote, we know that vaccines talking about the COVID-19 vaccines are killing people of color, blacks, Latinos, indigenous people at about two times the rate of white Americans. You know, last week, with the last time that I checked in that particular YouTube video is still on the official White House's YouTube channel.
Back to what happened in 2022, I was shocked, surprised, did I hear what I thought I heard? So I brought this information to my management, and in the research that I found, I could not find that the vaccines are killing people of color two times the rate of white Americans. I don't care what color you are, but online is that I discovered that the vaccines are killing people, period. And so I basically shared information from the vaccine adverse event reporting system. I noticed that there were 26,000, eight, 26,976 COVID-19 vaccine deaths noted on bears. I also shared data showing COVID-19 vaccine allergic reactions, facial paralysis, miscarriages, heart attacks, heart inflammation, seizure strokes, and sudden deaths.
And I advised them that they should inform senior leadership, the director of the California Department of Public Health at that time was Dr. Tomas Argon. I advised them to alert the California Health and Human Services Agency, which is the state equivalent of the Department of Health and Human Services that have your viscera overseas and Robert of Kennedy, Jr. is his successor. And if I can digress just a second, have a viscera, by the way, is running for governor of the state of California, okay, back to the subject. I also advised that the governor's office should be made aware of this shocking information with viscera said about the vaccine's killing people. The response I got from my deputy director, she was very unalarmed at learning that COVID-19 vaccines are injuring and killing people because all she said, quote, thanks for your
email, Ron. Well, it's, quote, wow, you know, there were some, one of the things that was very disturbing to me and to me, it shows culpability, look, I understand that, you know, experimental vaccines, things like that, there's likely going to be some problems, but I can't think of another time in history where they had that number of confirmed, you know, deaths listed in VAERS, you know, which is put in there by health professionals to where they didn't pull, immediately pull a vaccine and, you know, like I think it's something like if they had 10 deaths or 20 deaths, they would pull it. We're talking 20,000 and I saw that same data and one of the things that was very disturbing and sickening to me was you had the CDC under Rochelle Walensky who had actually seen Pfizer's own data that showed that it was causing, you know, that they had strong evidence in their
own data that it caused stillbirths and miscarriages and it even affected children who were breastfeeding. And she went forward five days after receiving that information and being made aware of that and what said, oh, this is perfectly, you know, safe and effective for pregnant women and nursing mothers, disgusting. These people have had to protect you myself legally, but these people have allegedly committed crimes against humanity. Absolutely. When you talked about, let me make this point, I, almost six months later, from the time that I initially said an email to my bosses about what the server said, I responded or revisited the issue in October 13th of 2022 and the deaths increased for more than 26,000 nationally
to 31,330 deaths, increase of more than 4,300 people. And I noted in that October 13th, 2020, to email that the 2003 smallpox vaccine program for healthcare workers, it was halted just after two deaths. Yeah. Yeah. Can you tell me 26,000, there's in April of 2022, 31,000, there's in October of 2022 and we're still telling people that these vaccines are safe and effective? Yeah. Well, the thing that's crazy is that, you know, they lied to us. They told us, hey, you need to take this so that grandma doesn't get sick. Knowing full well that it did not prevent the spread of the disease.
So they told us, remember, you had Fauci get up there and in previous videos, he said, ah, you know, these paper masks aren't really going to do anything. You know, cloth masks doesn't really stop. Do you think? But then later, he's on in the public saying, oh, yeah, you should double mask. It may be even triple mask. It's clear to me that they knowingly lied to the American public. You know, there's two kinds of line and I'm a Christian and I know the word of God. There's line by commission and there's line by omission. And again, I am sad to say, and these people, I don't have anything personally against them. Some of them have left the department. Some of them are still there. But they have lied by omission by not sharing with 40 million Californians that these vaccines are not safe and effective that they're killing people. Yeah, without a doubt.
Well, and you know, look, that's the best of them that light by omission. There were some that flat out knew and then went out there and actually spread lies like Wellinsky and Fauci and others, but, but you're right. There was a lot of people who just lacked courage. They lacked courage to speak the truth about these things and let the public know what was really going on. And, and, you know, and that we have laws about that that's called informed consent. And that's the problem is that they were not giving informed consent about these vaccines or, or about the fact that Ibermectin hydroxychloroquine and other things that were being seen to be very helpful. So yeah, it's, it's a very sad time in our country. I really, I think what's more sad to me than anything is that the American people fell for it. That they allowed themselves to be manipulated and controlled by the government. It says, you know, it basically says a lot about where we are as a people.
And, you know, we really, I think it should be a wake up call for all of us because I think it was a grand experiment in seeing how far they could push the American people into just obeying them blindly. Yes, it is unfortunate that 40 million Californians were not provided with informed consent. Since I've retired, I've gone throughout California, writing a cool K-NM spider motorcycle. And I've been speaking before the boards of supervisors throughout the state. I've gone to 52 out of 58 board supervisors this past Tuesday. I was at, I was an independence appearing before the annual county board of supervisors. And there's a doctor and local CEO of the hospital there. He now had a conversation prior to the meeting about the, with the blower, experience I had with CDPH, he's four vaccines, quite naturally, I'm opposed to them.
But you know what we agreed on? We agreed that people have a right to be informed so they can make decisions for themselves and their family members. Yeah. No problem with people who were at risk that decided they, you know, they wanted to take a chance on an experimental vaccine fine, go right ahead. But what bothered me was the fact that people were not informed of what the risks were, what the dangers were. And they were coerced in many places like in my case, I was working as a defense contractor and I was told, get vaccinated or lose your job. So I left and started my own business. Good for you. You know, I was not going to, and for me, it came down to, I had worked for the government long enough to know that when the government, the media, the hospitals, the drug companies are all walking hand in hand and singing kumbaya, something is wrong. And they're censoring dissent and is that the same thing? Yes. You're right.
And that was the really, that was the main thing that caught my attention was when they start censoring people like anybody that just even something as simple as a study, asking the question. Yeah, asking a question or publishing a state, I published a study that showed that the, it was a study done by two scientists out of India that had were geneticists and they said, there's no way that this thing came from a wet market. It could not have evolved that quickly. It had too many inclusions from, from murs, from SARS, from HIV and all these other things is that this thing was genetically manipulated. And I published, and that was out of a Lancet study, by the way, a peer review double-blind study. I ended up basically publishing that on Twitter and all I said was, hey, look at this. My account got banned. So that right there told me, wow, there's some serious manipulation going on here. Yes.
Wow. Yeah, so they're definitely, so tell me again, for those that are listening, what is the name of your book? And I'm assuming it's on Amazon where people can get to it? Yes, my book is titled, Muzzled Truth. I'm the truth that California Department Public Health Muzzles, they muzzle me, but I'm thinking, you know what? I'm not going to muzzle myself. Yeah, Muzzled Truth, how the California Department of Public Health rejected COVID-19 treatment and vaccine health risk warnings. It's available on Target, Walmart, or Amazon. And if people go to my website, muzzledtruth.com, M-U-Z-Z-L-E-D-T-R-U-T-H.com, there are buttons where you can purchase muzzle truth and paperback in e-book, as well as audio book read by yours truly. I recorded the audio book, which is just over four hours long, so people are on the road
trip and went to read Muzzled Truth, they can't, I'll listen to it, they can. That's great, that's great. Well, I'm assuming that people can also, if they want to get a hold of you to have you on their show, they can, is there a link to your email on that page as well? Yes, but I can't mind giving my email addresses, Ronald, R-O-N-A-L-D, at muzzletruth.com. My social media on X is muzzletruth1, and Facebook is Ronald F. Owens JR, Ronald F. Owens Jr. Excuse me. Thomas, forget my name. Well, thank you, Robert, for Ronald, Ronald, by the way. Ronald, Ronald Ford, that handed an illuminating perspective on muzzletruth. We appreciate your willingness to address these critical issues. As we prepare to step away for a brief break, please stay with us folks. When we return, we will be joined by Tim Dillard to discuss his innovative work with Freedom
Place, Mr. Dillard focuses on uniting communities, reclaiming foundations of cultural truths, and reimagining economic structures. We'll be right back after a short break. This is unleashed the political news hour. Virus protection and immune boosting just got easier. Enter the daily V-stack. Using cellular absorption technology, we put vitamins A, C, D, zinc, and quirceton together with a multi-mineral complex for complete protection. The daily V-stack is basically an oral IV of six products all in one at an affordable price. Go to chemicalfreebody.com, Ford slash out loud, get the daily V-stack, protect yourself, boost your immune system, and save 20% on your first order. In a world of rising prices, you can still grow abundance. I'm Doug Evans, author of the National Best Seller, The Sprout Book. Sprouts grow in three to five days without soil, sunshine, or fertilizer on your kitchen
countertop for under a dollar serving. Take control of your food and your future. Visit thesproutingcompany.com slash out loud and use the code out loud for an exclusive offer. Grow food, not fear. Welcome back to Unleashed the Political News Hour. We now transition into our third and final segment with Ten Dillard. The founder of Freedom Place, Mr. Dillard is advancing a comprehensive vision that seeks to unite communities around shared principles of faith, freedom, and national legacy. Through initiatives such as the American Legacy Park and related frameworks, he emphasizes reclaiming foundational cultural truths, fostering genuine unity among citizens, and restructuring economic systems to promote sustainable prosperity. I had you on my show last night, and we talked about some things.
One of the things, Tim, that you said that I thought was really interesting, and I think it's a very profound idea, which is that Andrew Breitbart, of course, is famous for saying that politics is downstream from culture. You had made a comment last night that really kind of, it stirred me, and it said, what is upstream from culture? Because we've got to look at that if we want to fix anything, and I thought that was such an appropriate thing, so thank you for joining tonight, or thank you for joining me today. Let's get into this. Awesome. That's great. Excuse me just a second. I had to cough there. Yeah. No, I'm glad it stirred you a little bit. Hopefully it stirred some of the people who got to see it in last night and subsequent days. We're serious as a heart attack about what we're doing. We've already been attacked multiple times by the forces that be.
We're very prepared for what's coming, but we have a lot to do in a long way to go. When you talk about, let's start with Breitbart, and politics is downstream from culture, and we talked about it briefly last night about how we had just such a great immediate example of how the culture ran out ice in Minnesota. They controlled the culture and the culture ran out ice. When you analyze history, which we did a little bit last night, and I'm happy to sit down with anybody and go through the details of that to prove it, because it's staring you in the face. The truth is just sitting there. When you say, okay, well, if politics is downstream from culture, and it is, it's just why do the leftists, why does the principle of communism stem a rise out of the principle of socialism, because they're socializing the culture? That's what it's about. We said last night, Stalin said the only purpose of socialism is communism, and that's true.
If politics is downstream from culture, then what's upstream? And history is sitting there with blatant, in your face, facts of how to analyze this, but without going into a lot of detail. The media is upstream from culture, clearly, and the media controls the culture. Even as they lose market share like crazy to all the alt-right media, they still maintain control of the narrative, because they control the brand of media, and they control the official stories, wherever there is an official story. And so they use that to leverage media to dominate the culture. Now media used to be TV radio and newspaper, now it's big tech. Big tech has supplanted big media. 70% of all that dollars now go to big tech, and it's actually more than that. That's the number you'll find if you go research it.
So big tech has supplanted big media. They used the exact same process that big media used, mate. It's a bidding war to see who can give them the most money. That's it. In TV, you gave them the most money, you got the most spots, you got the lowest rates. Newspaper, you got the biggest ads and the lowest rates. But nowhere in there is there a guarantee for sales. Right. And then 2000, we mentioned this last night. In 2000, everything changed. It went from traditional media, but we call estimated audience size media buys. How many people are watching? How many people are reading? Then this or how many people are listening, then your ad is going to cost X amount of dollars based on those supposed ears or eyes. And that's like your Nielsen ratings and all of that, which is some weird magic formula that they use to figure that out. Well, there's corruption everywhere. Right. So, but big tech came in and said, well, we're not going to charge you for estimated
audience size. We're going to create a one-to-one relationship between your advertising dollars, which is 100% at risk. And what you see as our new definition of results, because the old definition used to be, you spend enough money on enough ads, you'll eventually get sales. That's it. That's how the whole thing worked for 500 years. It worked that way. And nobody could tell you how much you needed to spend or how long you need to spend. That was very involved in that world. I know it really well. So big tech steps in in 2000 and says, no, we're going to let you get a click to your website and you'll pay for that. Or we can verify that somebody saw the page that your ad was on. And we'll call that an impression. And that caused a lot less than somebody clicking that ad and coming to your website. And all the money went, wow, that's more accountable. Let's go over there. And that's so that's what happened. Well, all right. Now, we're talking about this because we're talking about how to change the
culture so that we can fix the politics. Because clearly, when Nate Kane walks in with all the evidence of what's happened when you did what you did. Well, the world should have just said, my God, he's got all the proof. Why don't we just, well, no, because politics doesn't work that way. And so the politics is corrupt and broken. The media is corrupt and broken. The culture is rather. I mean, they're cutting off children's genitals and calling it life affirming. The literal words. Yeah. Okay, well, I read about that in 2007 when I was talking about the plans that they were using to take over the country. And in the final phase, it said, there was a bullet point said, confusion of the genders. And I was thinking, what? What's confusion of the genders? But we'll know. We know. Megan Flock's going in and there's also, you know, it's clear that, you know, they they have been able to manipulate and
particular our children through the public education and private. Because it's also the universities that are pushing a lot of this communist nonsense. Sure. But, but they're, but there's one area where we really actually do have some capability of being able to influence. And that is where we spend our money. And so I do think that there's something to what you're saying and the importance of being able to change the way that we do business. Well, you don't even have to do that. That's, that's, that's the beauty of what we're about ready to do. It's not, it's, we're not saying change who you buy from. All right. So, so advertising is now about clicks and impressions. There's $700 billion a year going into clicks and impressions just in the media. That's digital media. The other 300 billion goes to the traditional media of outdoor newspaper, radio and TV. But half of that they don't tell you is being spent on clicks and impressions.
So 85% of the ad dollars in the United States. Now, here's how broken we didn't get into the details. But since you asked about Freedom Place, I'll give you a little detail here. Here's how broken the system is. All right. Now, we're, we're in the context of how are we going to change the politics? Well, we've got to fix the culture. Well, well, how do you fix that? You, you go upstream and you find the most vulnerable spot that they have. Which is advertising. Their entire system, I looked it up after we talked last night because we were talking about alphabet, right? And they're money and we talked about how much money they make off of data sales. I have all that, all those numbers. It's less than 1% Nate. They make 80% of their money off of advertising, 80% which is 100% clicks and impressions. That's why when we put this in the AI and said, after meeting with FTC lawyers, you said, oh, my God, we've never seen anything like this. When we put it in AI, I was thinking, well, how are they going to react to us?
Thinking it would tell us they're going to laugh at you all the way to the bank because they're not worried about you. And it said just the opposite. They're going to view you as an existential threat. And it went into great detail. Why? Okay. So how? Why? Again, there's nothing more important in the world than saving America. Nothing. We're going to lose the Senate and the House in November. Period. The question is, how much? You're going to lose it. There's no way. Right now, unless something concretibly dramatic happens. But as of today, there is no possible way. Historically, I'm still praying for a miracle. Let me be really bold. I am the miracle. Now, when I say that I'm representing hundreds of people, we are the miracle, okay? Because we have three parts to what we're doing. We have to unite people. And you're not going to unite them with a movement or let's go fight on. Let's go, you know, you're not going to unite people like that.
We're going to have that two minutes of prayer on November 1st, two days before the election. And we're going to have so many people all over the world, two billion people. We've got people all over the world getting ready for this. And we're getting ready to launch it in America, probably at CPAC this week in Dallas. And all of this applies to what we're talking about in the media and the clicks and the impressions. We're going to unite the people, the amount of pastors that we have all over the world that are going, we have to say of America and we're very worried about November. All right, so God works through people. And when I say I am the miracle or we are the miracle, we've worked on this for a long time. It's been a lot of money and paid a hell of a price to get here. All right, we can look anybody in the eye and say we've earned the right to sit at this table. But everything we're doing is for God, family and country, period. And we can prove that to anybody and we'll be very open with anybody that seeks to doubt that.
All right, so we will unite people with that because we're going to put so much pressure from around the world to pray for two minutes all at the same time around the world, the exact same two minutes all together through a unique app, which in the video I sent you, you can look at that and you're welcome to show that to anybody. You can see how it works. It's so simple and everybody does the same thing. And I've had people that have been in and out of the the the Oval Office that have gone, oh my God, we got to do this. Now, there's a long way between them saying that and then getting involved and we really don't need them. We would want them. So that's very important. So when you say you're praying for a miracle and I say in all humility because I'm the least likely redneck, hillbilly cage and Texan to be involved in any of this, but I'm super involved because I know what we have to do. And so now you look at what happened 25 years ago when they said just clicks and impressions. But they're doing the same thing. It's a bidding war for each click and each pression and they win whether a business gets sales or not. And there's this huge dissatisfaction
with the whole clicks and impression model. But it's a lot better than what we used to have. So we've come along with a technology that says businesses only pay for sales. It's not there's nothing going to change, Nate. We've got hundreds of thousands of business. We have multiple platforms on our deals platform. We got everybody from Walmart to thousands and thousands of local businesses already ready to go. That's just on our deals platform. We have a gift cards platform where everybody buys a gift card for 10% off. So when and that's what I'm saying, we're doing something completely different, completely new and it's not going to make sense until you see it. And then it's going to you're going to go, this is so simple and it is. Because everybody just joins for free and passes it on because all we have to do is so simple. You can't believe it. And I'll finish the thought on the media. So our technology says, is there something better than what Google, Amazon, Facebook, YouTube and all the rest do right now?
Is are we at the end? Have we got to the the the pinnacle of technological prowess in the advertising customer acquisition process? And we say, well, what if businesses only had to pay for sales? And there's not a business alive that's not going to choose, well, I want to pay for sales. Now, the reality check is you still need estimated advertising media like TV and radio and newspaper. And you still will need clicks and impressions advertising. But we've got a new model that says businesses only pay for sales, which that alone is revolutionary. But you talked about the perpetual loop ecosystem. What our technology does is each post sale payment goes to people in a way that they get the money that used to be a hundred percent at risk on clicks and impressions. And it's now a hundred percent after the sale so that they're finding out about products and businesses by getting the same money. And it's actually the same process for the business.
The business isn't even have to change what they do other than they do it in our new ecosystem. And then the money goes to people so that what happens the business gets more sales so that what happens more people get more money. Because we're so connected. How many people in your phone? How many people in and I don't want you to tell me, but in your email and your and your cybersecurity understand the connectivity that's out there. It we're hyper connected as human beings now. Well, the media world was built on the fact that we weren't connected and they everybody needed a middleman to broker the buying and selling. And so when big tech came in with a much more accountable model, all the money went over there. But it's the same thing. It's the same bidding war. You don't get sales and they win whether you get sales or not. They're always winning. And the person that bids the most money is going to get the most clicks and the most impressions.
Ours works and it's the same bidding war. And the money that's bid is just like a click or impression, but it's called a rebate. And that's it. It's basically it's redirecting money away from the big tech companies and to the people so they can actually get a rebate. We're all connected. We don't need them to broker our buying and selling any longer. I'm going to say that again, we're all connected. We do not need big tech and big media to broker our buying and selling. We need something to activate all the connections that you have Nate. And that's all. You just join for free and pass it to them and go and you're going to tell them you all pass it to everyone you know and they pass it to everyone they know. We'll track for four passes. This isn't multi-level marketing. It's not affiliate marketing. It's brand new. It's it's called transaction networking. If you think about those two words, transaction networking, we're all connected. I want you to make money off the people that you're connected with. So they're not going to get the rebates when
they buy stuff. You are. And the person who you signed up through and the person who they signed up through and the person who they signed up through. Everybody joins for free and passes it on. And we're going to be doing six to eight months of just that because Nate, the system is broken and corrupt. All right. And we'll tie this all together. The system is totally broken and corrupt. The politics is broken and corrupt. Hillary Clinton will never get in trouble. Yeah. No one's going to get in trouble for the Epstein. No one. It isn't going to happen. This isn't new to the American experience. This isn't new to politics. It isn't new to how governments work. They've always worked with two to three systems of justice. It's just how it works. I can give you the historical evolution of that, but now it's not the time. And so all we've got to do, if that system is broken and corrupt and if politics is downstream from culture and media is upstream from from culture and media controls culture. And if we have a better way of doing customer
acquisition, no more clicks and impressions. You only pay after a sale, but we're making them did the same way. They're bidding to pay people more money that's vitally spread so that the people get the money to find out about the business so that they go buy this more stuff from the business so that even more people make money. That's the perpetual loop ecosphere. We have all concept platforms, gift cards, classifieds. Wait, dude, wait till you see what we've got come in for just charity. Our charity systems are totally broken and corrupt. You did, did you learn anything about the charity of the Clinton Foundation? Oh, yeah. It's a big money laundering scheme. Right. Well, they all are. Look at the NGOs that doze in. And then, well, that's a big problem too. Even for what we would consider legitimate charities, you know, there are rating systems which will tell you how much money is actually even going to the charity versus, you know, how much is going towards administrative fees. And it's unbelievable.
I think most people don't realize a lot of the money they're giving to charity isn't actually getting out to helping the people that they're, you know, trying. Well, yeah, the typical charity has about that. Well, let's just take churches. All right, churches. Yeah. The average church in America, 90% of all money that comes in goes to real estate or staff, 90%. Yeah. That and the charities are usually worse. Yeah, but they're like 95% usually makes you wonder what Jesus would be doing today with the money. I think about this. I told you about one of our partners Dr. Bing Graham, please pray for him. He's fighting cancer, but he has Graham family films, came out of the Graham family brand and all that. He's got 200,000 pastor. He's one of many. He's got 200,000 pastors. They have 40 million people waiting on us to start. We're going to do is also fix giving. So what we've done, Nate, is we figured out how to take nobody really changes what they're doing other than they invite everybody else to join with them so that you can make
money off of them and who they pace it to and who they pass it to and who they pass it to. It's a multi level marketing. It's it's nobody pays for anything. You get to see how much money you're making for you even have to pay anything. So Tim, where can people find out about this? How do they reach out to you? Right now they need to email me directly. Tim at freedomplace.com. There's lots of stuff we can show, but we're not putting it out in the public yet. But if they're if they say they saw me or heard me with you, I'm glad to talk to people because we're just beginning this piece, which we're going to propagate that Nate, this is really simple. This is how to sum it up. We have to move everybody from A to B. And those who make the rules get the gold. We've changed the rules. And they're very vulnerable in that in that particular place advertising. And we have a better model. That's it. Let's move everybody from A to B and we win. Our balls equals cash. We just need to move the eyeballs. Okay. Well, Tim, I want to thank you for coming on the show
and sharing this. I think that we need more innovation. We need more entrepreneurship and any way that we can cut out these big, massive corporate big tech companies that do not have our best interests in mind, the better. So I think this is a great thing that you guys are doing. Well, that concludes today's edition of Unleash the Political News Hour. We appreciate the contributions of our guests, Ronald F Owens Jr., whose book Muzzled Truth Shed's Critical Light on Public Health Decision, making during the COVID-19 era and Tim Dillard, whose work with Freedom Place presents an innovative path towards community renewal and systematic reform. We also extend our gratitude to you, our audience, for joining us as we examine the pressing political and societal issues of our time. Please continue the conversation through your preferred platforms and join us next time or further analysis and discussion until then stay
informed, stay engaged and stay committed to the truth and liberty. This is Unleashed the Political News Hour signing off.
More episodes
More from America Out Loud News
Turning the tide on America’s fentanyl crisis
America Out Loud News
Remembering the anniversaries of Charlie Kirk and September 11
America Out Loud News
Is public education unconstitutional? Nebraska Court to decide
America Out Loud News
As we remember 9/11, what have intelligence agencies learned?
America Out Loud News