Loading...
Loading...

April 6, 2026, 7pm: In a press conference today with military leaders, President Trump failed to present a plan for the now six week war with Iran, and continued to push threats that may constitute war crimes if carried out. Rep. Maggie Goodlander, one of the lawmakers who urged military members to "refuse illegal orders", joins the hosts to weigh in on Congress' reactions to the president's threats. And, MS NOW National Security and Intelligence Analyst Michael Feinberg joins the hosts to unpack the President's retribution agenda, which may place Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in the driver's seat as the loyal enforcer.
For more, follow us on Instagram and BlueSky @weeknightmsnow and @ms.now.
To listen to this show and other MS podcasts without ads, sign up for MS NOW Premium on Apple Podcasts.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
Subscribe to MSNow Premium on Apple Podcasts for early access, ad-free listening and bonus
content to all of MSNow's original podcasts, including the Char Topping series The Best
People with Nicole Wallace. Why is this happening? Main Justice and more! Plus new episodes
of all your favorite MSNow shows ad-free and ad-free listening to all of Rachel Maddo's
original series, including Rachel Maddo Presents Burn Order. Subscribe to MSNow Premium on Apple
Podcasts.
Good evening and welcome to the weeknight. I'm Michael Steele with Simone Sanders,
Townsend and Luke Russell in for Alicia Menendez, breaking tonight the president.
Desperate to change the narrative on the Iran War fails miserably. Instead,
raising more questions about his ability to lead the country as this precarious moment continues.
And soon we'll speak with one of the Democrats who earned service members refuse illegal
orders. Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander and asked her about Trump's threats that could
amount to war crimes, if carried out. Literally, it's their duty to refuse. Also ahead,
the search for a new attorney general is even more committed to the president,
willing to do whatever it takes and Trump's quest for retribution. Michael Feinberg is with us soon.
Breaking tonight, Donald Trump is trying and failing to control the narrative of his war of choice
with Iran. Today, the president produced a news conference with military leaders,
treating the moment more like reality television than an opportunity to explain why his war
is now stretching into its six-week. It was his moment to tout the amazing rescue of a missing
airman who was shot down Friday in Iran. But, you know, the president failed to offer anything
of substance about the days and weeks ahead. The one piece of new information, he threatened to
jail journalists who reported on that missing airman. Over the weekend, he once again ramped up
threats over Iran, against Iran, over the straight of Hormuz. This is what the president said,
that the time is running out for Iran to reopen the key shipping route, adding, quote,
48 hours before all hell will rain down. That made up deadline. It's now 25 hours away.
Here's Trump at today's news conference.
The entire country could be taken out in one night, and that night might be tomorrow night.
We're giving them till tomorrow, eight o'clock, eastern time, and after that, they're going to have
no bridges, they're going to have no power plants, stone ages, yeah. I can tell you they're
negotiating. We think in good faith, we're going to find out. There's a lot there, but
there's also the president's unhinged Easter message, where he said, quote, Tuesday will be
power plant day and bridge day all wrapped up in one. There will be nothing like it. Open the
fucking straight, you crazy bastards. A reporter asked Trump about that shameful post this afternoon.
Yesterday in your two social, you called the Iranians crazy bastards.
What is your response to critics who say that your mental health should perhaps be examined as
this war continued? I haven't heard that, but in the best case, you're going to have to have more
people like me because our country was being ripped off on trade or everything for many years
until I came along. Okay, so the post this weekend, America,
was disrespectful to say the least. But on Easter Sunday, in which you go after an embarrass
and in many respects, defame the Christian community on this day of days, but then to humiliate
and embarrass the Muslim community, you know, to go after Islam the way he did with that, with
praise be to Allah. At the end, it says a lot about the depravity of the man, the lack of a core.
There was a time when it was very normal for a president during Holy Week, also Passover was
around this time, where you put out message of unity, may faith, and God bless America, and may you
find your faith in all reigns of premiums, etc. Sunday morning, I'm going to pick up my mom to go
to Easter Mass. I could have text messages from a friend of mine who sends me this and goes,
is this real? I go, uh, yeah, oh my gosh, it absolutely is. And it was the trifecta of offending
people who are friends, Christians and friends Muslim, but also it offends the sensibilities of
anybody who's waking up on a Sunday morning just trying to go through the day. And it gets me to
this point of, what are we doing here? What are we doing here to have something that unhinged while
men and women are in harm's way in Iran? If you're the parent of one of those soldiers right now,
what are you thinking? Who is at the controls? This is the guy with the nuclear codes. Not to mention,
he's now treating Iran like it's some reality TV show, like it's WWE, you know, Smackdown 8 pm,
Tuesday night, while. Here's the thing y'all, this is whose Donald Trump has always been. You know
why we use the F4, we get one F4 to hour according to the idea. You know why we use the F4
in the intro because that's what the president wrote. And I think it is high past time people are
editing for the president. We have to put out there what he said to the American people so that maybe
people finally absorb that this is who the president is. The same man that sent out that unhinged
tweet on Easter Sunday is the same man that had that crazy press conference today where we didn't
really learn anything new except he wanted to jail a journalist is the same man that people elected,
not the 92% but the other people elected in the last presidential election. He has not changed,
he has been wildly and radically consistent and transparent with who he is. And it's high time
that folks just, again, what did that, what did Dr. Maya Angelou say y'all when somebody shows you
who they are? Believe them the first time. Perhaps people should start believing. Perhaps.
Let's bring in some other folks into this conversation. Retired Army Brigadier General Steven
Anderson is with us. And Angelou Corsone who is the president of Media Matters is also here.
All right folks. General, I want to start with you on this one because I want to play for you
a little bit of sound regarding the Straits of Hormuz. And what the president said today April,
I said on April 1st about this. Are you willing to end this conflict with Iran charging
tools for passage through the street? Us charging tools? Iran. What about us charging tools?
Is that something you're considering? I'd rather do that than let them have them run. Why shouldn't we
with the winner? We won. We have to have a deal. That's acceptable to me. And part of that deal is
going to be we want free traffic of oil and everything else. The hard part is done so it should be
easy. And in any event when this conflict is over the street will open up naturally. It'll just
open up naturally. So that was a mash between April 1st of the day. That's what's the day? The day is
the 6th. 6th. 6th. Y'all heard it. So, you know, and the day he comes out he goes, you know,
no bridges, no, you know, power plants, no scrubs. Oh, wait a minute. That's the song of the song.
Sorry, I don't know any of that. That's the song. Let's go and talk about that.
You're take general on the man who doesn't have a plan that is committing more and more of our
servicemen and women that you once commanded into this theater of war. His discretion, his choice,
his war. Michael, I'm very scared and everyone should be scared. All Americans should be scared
because our leadership is letting us down. This man is truly lost it. He does not understand
the enemy that he's fighting. And, you know, the will of the Iranian people to resist, to fight
has only been intensified by virtue of this bombing. Sure, we're blowing them to smithereens.
We're doing a lot of damage to their infrastructure. We're winning tactically every day.
Case in point, this fabulous rescue that was executed the other day, which was great. Oh,
by the way, though, we lost $250 million in aircraft during that, during their rescue. But,
hey, we did the right thing. We got the guy. But, you know, we are losing every single day.
And losing strategically, the United States is in the diminished state right now. Our allies
don't trust us. We're showing ourselves not to be a trustworthy ally. The GCC doesn't trust us.
They say you put all these bases here to keep us safe. We're now we're getting attacked.
The American people are paying more money at the gas pump. You know, the Strait of Hormuz is
still closed. Oh, excuse me, it's open. It's open to the Iranians, okay? The Iranians are getting
out plenty of oil. In fact, they're their revenues have increased. Russia is happy. Our enemies
are happy. The Chinese are happy. Everybody's happy. The United States is in serious trouble. We're
having to divert now munitions from South Korea to fight this war. Lord knows how much I mean,
we shot up in one month about four years of of GPMs of Tomahawk missiles. Four years we did in
one month in one month. That's the kind of thing that we're doing right now. What are we doing to
ourselves? Geopolitically across the the the world, we're hurting ourselves tremendously. America is
going down. Iran is going up. We're in big trouble. I think we shot up four years of the Tomahawks
in one month. I'm concerned. 850 we shot up and it's about 200 a year that we're making.
So do the math. I mean, it's not that hard. It's it's it's a terrible thing that we're doing. We're
shooting up way too much munitions. We're doing it. Shooting up a lot of picture missiles. And by
the way, we're using it to take out $20,000 drones. Okay. Million dollar missiles. That's how
guerrilla warfare works out this modern day and age. They overexpand you. This is like, look,
this is just like a video game where you just get an unlimited supply of weapons. You just keep
going through. You don't think about exactly how much you use it. And that's the defense secretary
often treats these things like a video game with his rhetoric. Angela, something that you've
studied extensively that I think we've seen come out through this administration. There's little
bits of I would say an undercurrent of Christian nationalism. I want to place a video of Pete
Heggs of today that that struck struck me in a troubling way.
Shot down on a Friday. Good Friday. Hidden in a cave. A crevice all of Saturday and rescued
on Sunday. Flown out of Iran is the sun was rising on Easter Sunday. A pilot reborn,
all home and accounted for you said glory be to God in this conflict. Do you believe that God
supports the United States actions? I do because God is good because God is good and God wants to see
people taking care of God doesn't like what's happening. Now we should say that the Pope and a bunch
of other bishops and religious leaders from many different many different base of all said that
this is an unjust war that there's no justification for it. But in terms of the messaging here,
Angela, it seems like they're setting themselves up in this existential holy war in a way.
And the rhetoric to say a pilot is reborn on Easter. I mean, that is getting into a very dangerous
space. Yeah, they are. And I, you know, that was very scary. The general sort of gave us the reality
of what's happening here. And the undercurrent that's taking place is that this is in fact a holy
war that is biblical. And what the rhetoric that you pointed to is the most mild examples of that.
I mean, Trump has posted a video tapping into a notion that he is the prophecy come to life
that part of what he is doing now was prophesized in the Bible. And that lit up Christian
nationalist communities. I mean, Pete Hegseth is seized the military as essentially a flaming
sword for Christ. I mean, he has advocated for the using the military to project Christianity
when he was a Fox News host. Not only was he pushing for war against Iran, but I think it's worth
pointing out the things that he was advocating for, which was to destroy their cultural heritage
sites in the process of doing it, even though it had no purpose whatsoever, because it was
going to serve God's purpose. And so there was a larger biblical benefit of it. So one of the things
that's happening to sort of intensify the feedback loop here is a notion that this is God's
war. He's on our side. So it doesn't matter if we're burning through all these supplies or
wasting all this money, because God is going to be our sort of our shield. And the scariest
piece of it is that they're starting to tee up a notion. It would talk or did a whole show on
Friday about demons. Vice President Vance talked about the fact that demons are among us with all
these UFO flying. So one of the things that's also happening is they're making, they're adding in
new villains that somehow these demons have come into this dimension. And this is not lunatic
saying it with a theory, but these are people with power that are out there saying that demons
are among us. And we need to start using our weapons and every all of our military might,
not only to execute God's will, but so that we can attack you. Do they know who the demons are?
No, the demons are the main street. The zip code or a phone number that we could all
dial in to someone. Well, I guess I mean, I don't I'm scared by this entire conversation to be honest
from we're out of business. We got demons. We got demons. And I'm just kind of like, first of all,
I will note the Christian Nationalist stuff was all throughout Project 2025. People should literally
look it up. And a very one of the, I think most flaming Christian Nationalists in this
administration is in fact the OMB director Russell vote who was very much so involved in Project
2025. Just one follow up for you on that. Can you just, it's not just the rhetoric about the Christian
Nationalist rhetoric. People are believing what they're saying. That's part of the problem.
Without a doubt. I mean, when, you know, the reason why Trump is tapping into that is because there's
been, you know, there's been a lot of coverage about the fractures within the right wing about
over this war. The one thing that has been growing in popularity and support for this war is
the evangelical communities, the Christian space. All of that part of their media ecosystem
is excited about this. So not only are people believing it, but they're getting impassioned
because he's making these very explicit calls to their religion. General, I want to talk a little
bit about war crimes and the bombings. I want to get into the sound of it so far because I
don't know how much time we have, but I just want to get your thoughts on a president who talks about
we have the power of our military to burn down every bridge to take out every power plant to
create the kind of humanitarian crisis in Iran that the rest of the globe would look at and go,
Oh hell no, you can't do that. That is against every, every civilian law that we can think of to
protect people who are not military personnel. Well, Secretary Hexeth needs to rename his office
from the Secretary of War to the Secretary of War crimes because that's exactly what they're
advocating right here. And any soldier that would obey the war crime that's being directed by
the President and the Secretary of Defense would be committing their own war crime. They would
be illegal. They would be essentially executing in illegal order. And that's exactly what Senator
Kelly and his colleagues talked about warned us about a couple of months ago. You know, we cannot
let that happen. It's terrible that there's gotten into the situation. And the chairman of Joint
Chiefs of Staff pushed back a little bit on Donald Trump today, but he needs to push back more
because our soldiers that execute these missions that are being directed by the President
may one day have to answer to the hagg or some other international tribunal figure the Nuremberg
trials. Okay, 12 senior leaders from the German military were executed. We're hung as a result of
their actions during World War II. Would we like to see that same thing happen to our American
soldiers? Of course not. Senior leaders need to understand that what they are being directed to
to do to execute would be an illegal order and they cannot in good conscience allow their soldiers
to execute those. All right, Brigadier General Steven Anderson and Angela Corson, thank you guys
very much for kicking us off here on our conversation. In just a moment, we'll continue this conversation
with Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander. One of the Democrats who urged service numbers to refuse
illegal orders. We're just talking about that. Mr. President considers asking troops to commit
what could amount to war crimes. And later folks, the Trump Justice Department wants to throw out a
warrigate era law designed to maintain presidential records. We'll have the details on that as well,
ahead right here on the weeknight.
As President Trump continues implementing his ambitious agenda, follow along with the MSNOW
newsletter Project 47. You'll get weekly updates sent straight to your inbox with expert
analysis on the administration's latest actions and how they're affecting the American people.
The American people are basically telling the president that they are not okay with any of this.
Sign up for the Project 47 newsletter at ms.now-slash-project-47.
So let's get back to that breaking news. Donald Trump claims the U.S. will start attacking Iran's
infrastructure if they don't reopen the state of Hormuz by tomorrow night. Here's the president
today in his own words. Every bridge in Iran will be decimated by 12 o'clock tomorrow night,
where every power plant in Iran will be out of business, burning, exploding, and never to be used
again. And it'll happen over a period of four hours if we wanted to. We don't want that to happen.
Keep in mind, military and law experts say bombing power plants that Iranian civilians rely on could
amount to war crimes. Joining us now on Congressman Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire,
she is one of six Democratic lawmakers who recorded this video last fall, reminding troops
they can refuse illegal orders.
We have we have a plan because of the power of our military, where every bridge in Iran
will be decimated. Are you going to serve that your threat to bomb power plants and bridges
amount to war? No, no, no, no, no. I hope I don't have to do it. People like you who I know
are fake, you're fake. The second reporter there was Zolan from The New York Times.
I'm wondering, Congressman, when your thoughts, we just had General
retired Brigadier General Stephen Anderson on. And he noted, and I'm going to quote him a little
bit here, he said, any soldier obeying the orders that the president was talking about in those clips
would essentially be executing an illegal order. Do you agree with that sentiment?
Well, thanks so much for having me.
Here's what I'd say. Look, the president is clearly unhinged and he's doing what we've seen him do
many times before, which is to speak off the cuff and on a whim and to degrade the basic rule of
law. He is a president who has said again and again that he has checked only by his own morality.
Well, here's the real check as I see it. We have the greatest military that the world has ever known
and we have service members who raised their right hand and they swear a note to our constitution.
They above all operate under the law. We made a decision as a country after the Second World War
that we wanted to be a country in which our military doesn't blindly follow orders. They follow
the law. And that is exactly why I came together with five of my colleagues to repeat this basic
principle under the uniform code of military justice. And it has been important every day since
we've said it the first time and that is why I will not be intimidated or silenced in doing my
job and saying what I believe the law is because that's the uniform code of military justice
that Congress writes. I was going to use the word unhinge to describe what the president has
said over the last few days and I want to talk about something that your colleague on the
Senate side, Chris Murphy said. He said in a post yesterday quote, if I were in Trump's cabinet,
I would spend Easter calling constitutional lawyers about the 25th amendment. This is completely
utterly unhinged. She's already killed thousands. He's going to kill thousands more. Of course,
that's in response to the open up the epit-straight. So you see that Congresswoman and I wonder,
there is no authorization for the use of military force for this war. His Republican colleagues,
the president's Republican colleagues have stopped a real open debate about it in a real vote on it.
Do you think that this moves the needle at all to where members of Congress on the Republican
side will hear from concerned parents that, hey, my son or daughter could be in a very serious war.
We haven't debated this. Oh, and by the way, the commander-in-chief who is sending them into danger
does not appear to be all with it. Do you think this moves it at all?
Well, what I can tell you is I am hearing from parents of service members who are overseas right now
putting their lives on the line from military families who have been put in an incredibly painful
situation where very suddenly their loved ones were sent overseas and we have a commander-in-chief
who is unprecedented in the cavalier and downright dangerous way that he is executing his
constitutional responsibilities. You know, when I take a look at the cabinet, the 25th amendment
really turns on people of good faith who mean their oaths to our constitution when they took them
who are willing to hold this president accountable and so far we don't see that kind of courage
from the president's cabinet. In Congress, I continue to believe that every member of the United
States Congress should be forced to vote on this war every day as long as it's being waged.
And we're 37 days in and with no real end in sight. And this is our most basic constitutional
responsibility. The Speaker of the House continues to do his job in a way that he is serving at the
pleasure of the president. And that is just absolutely upside down and truly dangerous in this
moment when we have a president who is making us less safe overseas, who has created a global
energy crisis that is jacking up costs right here at home. In the state of New Hampshire alone,
we've seen $40 million more in spending at the gas at the gas pump as a direct result of this
war. And that's just the beginning of the cost that people are feeling because of this president.
He's now saying we can't afford Medicare or Medicaid in this country because he wants to fund
this war of choice. We need people of good faith who love this country and who believe in their
responsibilities under their under our constitution to step up and do their jobs.
Congresswoman, you are not alone in with your colleagues in making it very clear. The opportunity
that our service men and women have to stay in the right lane when it comes to the orders they
receive. In other words, not following an illegal order. We had headlines this weekend and in the
past few days from the Archbishop of the military, Timothy Broglio, who is the head of the
Catechar Stysies for the military, who noted very clearly it's morally acceptable for troops not
to follow illegal orders. You also had a contrast in Easter messages to put it
politely this weekend between the Pope and the president. The Pope, the Pope noting that
we should not be engaged in military action right now. Not a piece imposed by force,
but through dialogue, not with the desire to dominate others, but to encounter them where they are
and to work through negotiation. The president, as Simone noted in our first block,
responded to what's going on in Iran that there will be nothing like the hell that he intends to
open and open the F and straight, you crazy bastards, ending that tweet with praise B to Allah.
With that is the backdrop. As a member of Congress, when you encounter men and women in the
military, what is their response to you and the stance that you've taken to reassure them
that the Congress has your back or it should in this regard. But the American people also
from everyday moms and dads to the Pope, to the Archbishop of the Military,
understand the moral code that we should be anchored by, that this president is not for the record,
is not. And yet here we are.
We have the greatest military that the world is ever known. And part of what makes us truly
extraordinary is that we made a decision as a country. After the Second World War, we decided
to be a country in which our military follows the law, upholds the law, doesn't just blindly
follow orders. This was Robert Jackson, who served as Attorney General, who was a Supreme Court
Justice, and who was the Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg. He was a critical part of crafting
the Department of Defense's law of war manual. And what he said about that decision we made,
he said it was the greatest tribute that power ever paid to reason. And part of why he said that
and why I believe that's deeply true is that this is not only who we are as Americans,
it is strategically sound. It does not make us safer to indiscriminately kill civilians.
It doesn't make us safer to make these empty threats. You know, the president so far has been,
the outcomes for the American people have been really terrible. This war at bottom, this war of
choice has cost us in lives, in dollars, and it has emboldened our adversaries. It has been a
true gift to Vladimir Putin. We are funding his war machine because of the big break that Donald
Trump gave to Vladimir Putin on sanctions relief. This has been a gift to Xi Jinping and the Chinese
Communist Party. This is what we're dealing with, the president who is totally detached from who
our real friends are. And by the way, again, today, we hear him threatening our NATO allies.
You know, the upshot of this is that we've seen damage to one of the most important
alliances in human history. And we've seen the hands of our adversaries strengthened enormously.
Well, Congresswoman Maggie Goodlando, we're going to leave it there. Thank you very much for your time.
When we come back, folks, new reporting on the president's search for a permanent attorney general.
One of the top contenders in his former personal lawyer. You are watching the weeknight.
As President Trump continues implementing his ambitious agenda, follow along with the MSNOW
newsletter, Project 47. You'll get weekly updates and straight to your inbox with expert
analysis on the administration's latest actions and how they're affecting the American people.
The American people are basically telling the president that they are not okay with any of this.
Sign up for the Project 47 newsletter at ms.nowslashproject47.
Well, Donald Trump's Justice Department is now arguing that the law governing presidential
records is actually unconstitutional. According to Politico, a new DOJ memo challenging the 48-year-old
law appears intended to give Trump the legal leeway to destroy White House records from his current
term and to refuse to hand over any remaining records when he leaves office.
The Presidential Records Act was created in the wake of the Watergate scandal as a check on corruption,
making clear that presidential records belong to the country, not the president.
Why do y'all think he wants the ability to destroy records?
Yeah, that's a very good question. So let's read a little bit from the memo from the DOJ's office
of legal counsel noting the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional because it exceeds
Congress's enumerated and implied powers and aggrandizes the legislative branch
that they expensive the constitutional independence and autonomy of the executive
one should note that that is not legally binding, that the next president or the next head of DOJ
could come back with a very different reading. 40 plus years in the making, it is sound public policy.
Period. But it is something that I think a lot of administrations have taken very seriously.
I mean, Simone, we spoke earlier about this, about how when you were in the White House, this
was something that was front and center that people saw really as a public service.
Yeah, the same attitude. And remember, the president works for the American people.
He works for the American people and it's important for the American people to have the ability
to review what went on in the people's house. By the way, there's about fencing that pushes you back
hundreds of yards ahead of family come in this weekend. You can even get near the people's house
anymore of the White House with all the fencing they put up. But the bottom line as you see things
like this is it feels like they're just trying to legalize something they're already doing.
Correct. I don't believe they're taking the acts the way they're supposed to. We saw that when
they ended up in the Mar-a-Lago bathroom. And remember, we now know, we don't know exactly what was
in the documents, what was the map, but we now know because of a memo that was accidentally
released by Congress that there was some highly sensitive information that was released in those
marbles that the president had. Macro, they're trying to undo the biggest reform after water
gate. That's a lot. And we have to ask why. Where do you hide it?
I didn't stop that. Where do you hide it? No one is doing that's illegal.
Well, nobody, how about this? Nobody go anywhere, okay? Because there's another hour of the weeknight
coming right up. We're going to discuss the economic chaos Trump has unleashed with his war
and refuses to address frankly. The other cabinet officials who could be fired by the president
and we will seek with Sean Harris, the Georgia Democrat hoping to fill Marjorie Taylor green's
old house seat. Keep it right here on MS now.
People act like the culture wars started five minutes ago. Meanwhile, adults have been panicking
about books since forever. Bandcamp, our top ranked podcast about banned books, is back for its
10th season. This time around, we're reading JD Salinger's classic The Catcher in the Rye.
We're reading the book out loud, covered to cover one chapter per episode.
By the way, we have no clue what's going to happen. We should have read this book in school. I don't
know why neither of us did. So you're basically going to hear us dumbling over words,
trying to figure it out as we go. It's going to be embarrassing. It's going to be cash.
So if you've never read it before but always wanted to, or you want to experience it again
through a set of new eyes, now's your chance. That sounds like you're kind of show you already
know where to find us. That's banned camp. Band, like in banned books. Not banned like tubas and snare drums.
The Weeknight
