
About this episode
Greenland on the table, NATO on edge, and an algorithm deciding who gets a knock at the door. We dive into President Trump’s Davos remarks claiming the U.S. will pursue Greenland, then trace the fallout across European capitals as Denmark draws a hard line on sovereignty and lawmakers move to unwind trade ties. If Greenland is already protected by NATO, what problem is “acquisition” solving—and at what cost to U.S. credibility, markets, and the transatlantic alliance?
From there, we cut through fuzzy NATO math. The much‑touted jump to 5 percent defense spending looks more like creative accounting than real muscle, with roads and rail counted as deterrence and deadlines pushed years out. Theater might buy applause, but it doesn’t buy readiness. On Ukraine, the rhetoric of nearing peace collides with a harsher map: mass drone and missile strikes, a frayed grid, rare hypersonic shots, and manpower strains that no press conference can paper over. Signing a bilateral pact that Moscow rejects as a red line isn’t a glide path to de‑escalation; it’s a fresh wedge that could harden the war.
The most chilling turn lands at home. We reveal how a Palantir‑powered tool helps ICE score neighborhoods and surface targets, while agencies purchase sensitive data from tech brokers to sidestep warrants. When a confidence number can trigger a raid, due process becomes optional and your phone becomes a surveillance beacon. Security doesn’t require pretending algorithms are oracles; it demands laws that protect rights and a strategy that separates signal from noise.
If you value clear analysis over spin, tap follow, share this episode with someone who tracks foreign policy and tech, and leave a quick review telling us which topic you want us to dig into next. Your support helps this show reach the people who need it most.
CHAPTERS:
- 0:00 Setting The Stakes: A Turbulent News Cycle
- 4:16 Trump’s Davos Claim: “We Will Have Greenland”
- 10:55 Denmark’s Red Lines And NATO Reality
- 18:00 Tariffs, Treasuries, And Transatlantic Fallout
- 25:40 NATO Spending Myths And Political Theater
- 30:40 Ukraine “Peace” Claims Versus Escalation On The Ground
- 38:20 AI-Driven ICE Targeting And Civil Liberty Risks
- 44:34 Data Brokerage, Warrant Workarounds, And A Call For Action
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy
Get every episode summarized
Each time Kyle Anzalone Show publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Transcript ready
494 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Kyle Anzalone Show — ICE Using AI to ID Targets, Breaking Down Trump’s WEF Speech. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
You You
You You
You You We are back with another episode of the Kyle landslone show and the new cycle today has been
Absolutely crazy. I feel like I've just been working 24-7 over the past couple of weeks trying to keep up with everything going on in the world Donald Trump is making major headlines. There's a lot we have to talk about today And it really seems like with Donald Trump It's almost everything's like making a wish with a genie right where you know You wish for a million dollars and then genie drops it on your head and kills you or something like that where You want to get rid of the NATO alliance and Donald Trump Is going to maybe do that but only through going to war with Europe over Greenland, which is even worse or You know, you want him to close the borders and have a realistic immigration policy And now we have a militaristic police force all over our country Rounding up random people and in fact as we'll talk about today show even using AI to help out in the process So a lot to talk about today show Trump says we will have Greenland the president is wrong about NATO Trump claims he is about to end the war in Ukraine and an Israeli-style AI
Targeting program for ice. I mean this is absolutely unbelievable and we have to talk about on today's show But let's kick it off here with Greenland Donald Trump is at the world economic forum in Davos and earlier today he was speaking He talked about a range of topics as Trump always does he rambles. He actually looked a little bit under the weather As he was giving this address But he was definitely off scripted a lot had a lot of interesting things to say so let's roll this first clip He never asked for anything And we never got anything we probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force Where we would be frankly unstoppable But I won't do that Okay now everyone's saying oh good That's probably the biggest statement I mean because people thought I would use force. I don't have to use force. I don't want to use force. I won't use force
All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland where we already had it As a trustee but respectfully returned it back to Denmark not long ago after we defeated The Germans the Japanese the Italians and others in World War II we gave it back to them So A lot to say here But first of all the big part about this part Trump's address is that he says the US isn't going to use military force to take Greenland Now this shouldn't be a significant announcement from a US president After all we you know shouldn't be going around and expanding our borders. We got enough problems Here at home to address that we don't need to go in acquire Greenland As a part of US policy But that Donald Trump in recent days have been asked if you would use military force to acquire Greenland And he had said that he's not willing to talk about that the White House has said something along the lines of all options are on the table
So there was a real concern here that Donald Trump was actually considering using military force to take Greenland Now almost more shocking than that that he you know Doesn't ways in the United States talking to the American people addressing American reporters He's not telling them that he's not going to use military force to take Greenland He waits until he's at Davos in front of a bunch of European leaders And I think in part he does this because he he wants to issue commentary on his own statement He wants to not only say that the US isn't going to take Greenland He then wants to tell the audience the European leaders how they should be acting They should be breathing a sigh of relief. They should be happy about this But then he goes on to say we are going to acquire Greenland And so this still puts us in the the problem of how is the president planning on doing this
And so he has some more statements when it comes to Greenland let's roll the next clip The American presidents have sought to purchase Greenland For nearly two centuries you know for two centuries they've been trying to do it They should have kept it after we're two but they had a different prison. That's all right people think differently Much more necessary now than it was at that time however In 2019 Denmark said that they would spend over two hundred million dollars to strengthen Greenland's defenses But as you know they spent less than one percent of that amount one percent just no sign of Denmark there I say that with great respect for Denmark who whose people I love whose leaders are very good It's the United States alone that can protect this giant massive land this giant piece of ice Develop it and improve it and make it so that it's good for Europe and say for Europe and good for us
And that's the reason I'm seeking immediate negotiations to once again discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States Just as we have acquired many of the territories throughout our history As many of the European nations have they've acquired. There's nothing wrong with it So there there's a lot here the big part of course is Trump saying that we're entering Into immediate negotiations to acquire Greenland the problem is Greenland isn't for sale right? I can't just go knock on my neighbor's door and say we're entering into immediate negotiations for me to buy your house If his house is in on the market and he doesn't want to move right and if I do that every day I think he's going to get kind of concerned that maybe I really want his house and I might do something Absolutely insane to take it and so Donald Trump ruling out using military force but then saying we are going to acquire this territory Is kind of confounding because if it's not going to if Denmark is not willing to negotiate and not willing to sell the United States or in some other way
Grant the United States Denmark through a diplomatic process Then the only other option is military and Let's go ahead and just play this clip of the Danish Prime Minister explaining. This isn't an option As I also understand the president touches on this in a speech in a way that respects our red lines That's what we can negotiate about I mean, we don't start any negotiations based on giving up on some fundamental principles We will never do that. We are living in 2026 We stand on a foundation one that the US itself has largely helped to create after World War II Where there are international legal rules Where the right of peoples to self-determination must be respected And the sovereignty of nations And that's the approach we take into these discussions and and we are not going to budge an inch on that He's saying we're not going to budge an inch on the on the core thing which is you know sovereignty in respect for air national law which means
Greenland isn't giving our Denmark isn't giving Greenland To the United States of America and so we come back to the the fundamental problem here Which is what does Trump do when he says we need Greenland? We must have Greenland We have to acquire Greenland. He's making this about our national security He's saying this over and over and over again and Greenland isn't Denmark isn't willing to give a Greenland So then what happens how does the US acquire Greenland this seems A real problem for Trump and my guess is that he is still eyeing using military force I think he actually ran into a little bit of a problem that he created for himself which is He he not only said this, but then he started to poke at and start to escalate an economic war with the Europeans He started by placing tariffs on eight countries 10% tariffs threatening to raise those tariffs to 25% in June
And Europe responded in a couple of ways one the European Parliament actually voted today after Trump made these remarks They voted to cancel a trade agreement that they have With the United States that was signed back in June and that trade agreement the US agreed to lower tariffs on the European countries And it's changed for the European countries agreeing to invest sits under a billion dollars in the American economy and also by 750 billion dollars in American energy at sports And so this was you know a massive influx for the American economy and not only that Europe does a lot of other business in the United States They buy a lot of US Treasury bonds and so not only did Europe cancel that agreement, but European countries were also talking about selling off their US Treasury bonds Just you know non-government pension funds had announced that they were selling off their US Treasuries And so this was going to create a problem for the US dollar
And I think Trump realized he got himself into a real pickle here where he was going to end up doing damage To the American economy in the process of taking Greenland which I'm sure would have been highly highly unpopular with the American people So all this you know said Trump has just You create a whole unnecessary problem with all this the US doesn't need to take Greenland Doesn't need to have Greenland the whole thing that he keeps going bad to in all his speeches That oh Russia and China are present preventing presenting a threat to Greenland and the government at Denmark isn't doing enough to protect The island from those two countries which you know, he says oh, they agree to invest 200 million in their defense of Greenland Well, it's a huge territory $200 million isn't going to do absolutely anything But the most important point is
Denmark is a member in NATO Greenland being a Danish colony is under NATO protection and Donald Trump says again and again and again That the US will uphold its commitments to NATO which means if Russia or China attack Greenland the US would come to the island's defense and so What he's saying that Russia or China are going to attack Greenland if the US doesn't take it over Is simply on true because it still has the backing of the American military and the status quo Now one interesting thing that Donald Trump keeps doing that Isn't gain a whole lot of attention is he keeps trying to cast doubt on Denmark's claim to Greenland he'll say something like oh, they had a couple of boats land there a couple a hundred years ago And why does that mean that they control it today? We had a couple boats land there too Which I'm sure there have been American vessels in Greenland although I'm pretty sure Denmark has established a presence in Greenland before America
Was the independent country so you know that the timing on that is somewhat significant as To how colonies and things like that are determined now as a libertarian of course I think the Greenlanders should if they want to remain a part of the kingdom of Denmark Let them do that, but if they prefer a path of independence I think they probably do according to some of the polls. I've seen That they should be allowed to do that But of course it has nothing to do with the United States of America He's also Referred to the fact that during World War II their large American occupation there and you know We scaled that that occupation after the the end of that conflict and he's basically saying that that was a mistake That we should basically just kept Greenland militarized colony of the United States and and then it could be an official colony are part of the United States under the Trump presidency So this all about Greenland seems completely assinine But it is very important for a lot of reasons including this does really have the potential to fracture the North Atlantic Alliance
And I'm not even saying this as necessarily a bad thing, right? I wish the United States would get out of NATO and would support almost I will almost any scenario that gets us out of NATO Maybe the one scenario I wouldn't support is the United States going to war with Europe Over and completely a relevant territory to the United States of America And then having the Alliance fracture the relationship fracture the trade agreements fracture All over something that absolutely does not benefit Americans at all We should withdraw from NATO We should it go to war with NATO, which seems to be the path that Trump really wants to go down Now after Trump gave his actual address at the W-A-E-F in Davos He then sat down with NATO Secretary General Mark Grute on the sidelines and gave a press conference So I have a clip from that The Danish Foreign Minister rejected your call to negotiate on Greenland
What will happen? Sorry the the Danish Foreign Minister rejected what you said in your speech that you were hoping to negotiate Why are Greenland essentially saying that this is not something that they are willing to discuss What will those negotiate? So You see Trump watching his plan absolutely blow up in his face in real time Right this reporter is saying that you know, she's I think referencing the clip of the Danish Prime Minister that I played before That they had ruled out negotiating over their sub what they views are sovereign territory And now what is Donald Trump going to do? Well apparently he's going to sit down with NATO Secretary General Mark Grute who is not Danish And he says that he has reached a framework with Grute Can we pull up this a true social post that Donald Trump put out just this afternoon
Donald Trump writes based upon a very productive meeting that I had with the Secretary General of NATO Mark Grute We have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and in fact the entire Arctic region And so now Donald Trump says oh, I sat down with Rute who I believe was the former Prime Minister of the Netherlands so and not Denmark And we reached an agreement on on Greenland What what does that have to do with anything right going bad to the example of my neighbor's house before Right if my neighbor who lives to the left if I want his house and keep you know telling me as a cell to me even that He doesn't want to I go talk to my neighbor on the right and he agrees that they're going to sell me You know the neighbor on the left's house. That means absolutely nothing It has nothing to do with the situation here and get Donald Trump is announcing this as if he's reached some massive deal for Greenland
Now I could imagine one or two scenarios here one Trump is actually backing down He's realized that the economic ramifications of severing ties with Europe over Greenland simply isn't worth it And so what he's going to do is Mark Rute is going to go to NATO and he's going to get each country to pledge between like 100 and 1,000 soldiers to send to Greenland some F 35s are going to build some military bases Spend a few billion dollars in Greenland and then Trump is going to say because of my threats The island is now protective from Russia and China which again Never present a threat to Greenland in the first place. So maybe this is Donald Trump finding an adhesive ramp The second possibility is Trump really doesn't understand the whole dynamics at play here And he really thinks that he is going to send JD Vance Marco Rubio and Steve Wichoff to sit down with some NATO officials and they're going to work out a deal for the US to acquire Greenland
It's absolutely insane and completely out of the realm of what's going to happen But that is what the president of the United States is saying Now Maybe the most interesting statement at the W EF this year was from the Canadian Prime Minister Mark Cardi This is only kind of gently related to the Greenland thing But I really just want to play this clip because I got a huge kick out of it We knew the story of the international rules base order was partially false But the strongest would exempt themselves when convenient that trade rules were enforced asymmetrically And we knew that international law applied with varying rigor depending on the identity of the accused or the victim This fiction was useful An American hegemony in particular help provide public goods Open sea lanes a stable financial system collective security and support for frameworks for resolving disputes
So we placed the sign in the window We participated in the rituals And we largely avoided calling out the gaps between rhetoric and reality This bargain no longer works Let me be direct We are in the midst of a rupture not a transition Over the past two decades a series of crises in finance health energy and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration But more recently Great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons Terrifices leverage financial infrastructure as coercion supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration When integration becomes the source of your subordination Absolutely incredible right that this is the leader of canada just coming on stage and saying all those years that we talked about international law
We knew it was all fake that the war in Iraq that wasn't legal that all these countries we sanctioned We looked the other way even though it was a violation of international law But now now that Donald Trump is Treating canada like he treats Iran or Venezuela Well now it's a problem now it has to be addressed now. We can't play pretend anymore Now it matters and it's really just an absolutely crazy emission first of all that all of us We're right all along that when we have said this isn't about international law. This isn't about human rights This isn't about You know making sure that bad regimes don't make money. That's why we had to have these sanctions in place It was that that's all a lie as he said it was a ritual we went through the ritual which This is a partly is unsaid. It's a blood ritual right? This is the ritual to create a war in a country where there need not be war
These are wars of choice These are sanctioning countries because we have minor disagreements with the leaders of those countries not not major disagreements We don't have territorial disputes with the Iranians the Iranian government isn't dropping bombs in the United States They're not there's not a mass wave of Iranians arriving at the U.S. Southern border, right? We have minor insignificant differences with the Iranians that that would matter 0% to any Americans as they go about their daily lives whatsoever But because you know, there's influences in the United States that don't like Iran and they decided that they're an enemy of choice The entire Western world goes along with the ritual that oh, they're bad We have to condemn them naughty naughty naughty and this is all about human rights and for the good of the world and About international law and upholding what's right and he's saying that that was all this whole entire time
It was all just a lie that they've been all their moral grandstanding as he over the past couple of decades as he said Has been just that it has nothing to do about helping the Venezuelans or the Iranian people the Iraqi people the Syrians And two dozen other countries that have been absolutely destroyed by the West And all in the name of human rights, but it's not it's not about human rights guys and So it's great that you know, we're getting this emission and why maybe the positive things about Donald Trump Is he's provoking leaders to make these kinds of statements? but It is just so telling and so bleak that we've had to sit through this for so long while they lied to us about You know this being about human rights and and those of us who oppose these policies right when if you didn't oppose last week Or if you didn't support last week the United States bombing Iran then why don't you care about the Iranian people
You care so much about the Palestinian people, but not the Iranian people are the Iranian government's killing their people Why don't you care about them and they keep you know going and trying to demonize you for opposing their wars Which they say are based around human rights, but as Markarni says it's all just a ritual It's all just performance. It's all just propaganda to get you To either go or to send your children to go and fight for and wars potentially, you know lose your children lose your life yourself You know spend your country's money to achieve the goals of the leads in a few countries All right now. There's one more clip of Trump's press conference with Mark Routet. I wanted to play and I just want to really debunk this lie. So let's go and roll this clip We lifted the GDP from 2% to 5% together. That was done jointly And it worked out really very well We appreciate it Mark. So we'll be talking about various things. We'll be talking about Greenland
I imagine it may come up in our discussion and But I think the trip has been amazing. So it's been amazing as you know we're staying and tomorrow we're doing something else having to do with the board of peace. We're getting tremendous Uh Acceptance of that So we'll see how that all works out, but we're doing that tomorrow. So Donald Trump keep keep doing this He keeps saying this again and again and again and so misleading that he raised the minimum spending Among NATO members on their military to 5% of GDP This is a this is an absolute outright lie So what NATO did agree to is they have this loose cap that says all members must spend 2% of GDP on defense Now currently a third of the alliance doesn't meet that minimum and there are no repercussions for not meeting that minimum So it's really not a minimum. It's just a recommendation
Right, it's not a standard. There's no consequences. It's not you know if your country isn't spending this much on defense Then they no longer get to access the mutual defense of the alliance or something like that, right? It's it's just a recommendation However Last year they did increase the cap to basically 3.5% and then they they changed that to 5% But 1.5% is allowed to be spent on infrastructure So if the Germans build a new railway or a new highway that counts towards their minimum spending on defense Even though it has nothing to do with defense, right? Oh one day we might put a tank on a railway car and run it down this railway and so this counts as defense spending Obviously not Right, so they actually raised the recommendation to 3.5% not 2% But several members said that they have no plans to meet that several members don't have a plan to get to 2%
By the end of and by the way that cap or that recommendation doesn't even take effect until 2032 So 5 sits years from now Even Donald Trump gets another term. He would still be out of office by the time that that thing went into effect And so it's never going to happen. This is something that NATO did to pull the wool over the eyes of Donald Trump Right, they're going to pretend like oh, we're working on hitting the Trump 5% goal When in reality they're just going to now say that they're spending 1.5% more of their GDP on defense every year Because they're going to start including their infrastructure spending which they were already spending on It just didn't go to count towards the old 2% goal So this is all just Fitchin absolute Fitchin and that's why Mark Rutte fist pumps there because he knows that this is all just the scam To keep the Americans within NATO and get through Trump's four years in office until there's a more controllable figure in the White House now
He also had something to say on Ukraine here So I want to play this haven't talked about Ukraine a lot recently on the show and want to give some updates ending eight wars I have one to go. I thought that was going to be one of the easiest ones and it's turning out to be one of the tougher ones But you heard he say before 25 30,000 people dying a month. It's ridiculous And I think we're getting close to Jared's here and Steve Whitcup is here Well, a lot of people that are working on that are here and they're done a good job Are you just cut the clip and then we'll I'll just talk so I know sorry that the volume on that clip was really low But basically what down Trump saying he thinks we're very close to gain a peace deal done in Ukraine In reality the war is raging on in Ukraine on Tuesday night 300 Russian drones and missiles Noted out power to tens of thousands of people in Kiev by the way It's like negative three degrees in that city right now They knocked out the external power supply for the Chernobyl
Nuclear power plant disaster site there in northern Ukraine This is this war is not deescalating. We are not moving closer to peace tauts and any sense the word Right now just like it's a complete another fiction that Donald Trump could negotiate with Mark Routay to reach a deal for Greenland Donald Trump is working on signing a peace agreement with just one party To the war in Ukraine the Russians have said that they disagree with half of what's in the proposal That the Ukrainians and the Americans are working on and yet Zalinsky is going to come to the United States and sign it in the next couple of weeks That agreement is going to say that the US is going to Try to make Ukraine a formal ally of the United States of America with a bull on bilateral mutual defense path The one thing that Russia said when they evaded Ukraine is that Ukraine has to be neutral
So in a very important way Trump is actually taking us further away from resolving the war in Ukraine Then actually gain us closer to finding an end to that conflict He is Completely unhinged and disattached from reality Especially when it comes to American foreign policy And we just see it again and again and again and when it comes to Ukraine He's helping to escalate this conflict right the Ukrainians are hitting energy targets deep into Russian territory They try to hit one of Putin's homes in Russia They are escalating and provoking this war with the full on support of the United States of America Sure, unlike Joe Biden He's not sending two billion dollars in American weapons to Ukraine every week but He is helping Ukraine in other really essential ways and in ways that the Biden administration wasn't Particularly through the intelligence sharing and helping the Ukrainians to map out routes to
Send drones to hit energy targets deep inside Russian territory The more this happens the more the Russians are going to escalate Just a week ago they hit a Ukraine with the second arrestnic missile ever fired This is a hypersonic it is a nuclear capable missile although at the speeds that it travels It could do tremendous damage without a warhead whatsoever Which is what hit a military base in Western Ukraine last week they destroyed a drone facility A warehouse military barracks and a couple other things with a single missile And this was a direct response to the Ukrainians attacking Putin's residents so As the Ukrainians continue to escalate and carry out more provocative tads deeper and deeper inside of Russian territory With American support The Russians are going to also escalate in kind and they are going to knock out more Ukrainian energy infrastructure leaving people cold in the middle of winter
Making the Chernobyl site more vulnerable and also killing a lot of young Ukrainian men Who are conscripted and sent to the front lines You know I read a story recently that I guess two million Ukrainian men at this point are dodging the draft in another 200,000 have gone a wall. I mean Massive matches about some manpower problems in Ukraine and if Donald Trump doesn't get realistic on the Ukraine war very fast He could be looking at a situation where the Ukrainian military collapses And Zelensky is negotiating at the barrel of Vladimir Putin's gun and Putin essentially will dictate terms to Zelensky And there's nothing Washington could do about it anymore So if you want to have any influence on the war in Ukraine He better exert that influence soon and be very tough on Zelensky now Before I let you go This is Extremely troubling absolutely unbelievable. I'm sure a lot of people in my audience will remember
Something that I've been covering for a couple years now and that is the lavender program in Gaza Which was an AI developed by the Israelis where they would essentially give every Person in Gaza a score of how likely they were to be a Hamas militant And so you know they would have a certain they would set the metric let's say at 70 points You're considered a member of Hamas And so the then they put that into the AI and then the AI spits out a list of names of everybody It says scores above a 70 on the how likely are you to be Hamas And then some IDF soldier and this is according to IDF soldiers spend 20 seconds 20 seconds on each name So basically they check to make sure the person's a male and above the age 18 And if they are there put on a kill list now as the Israeli said at the time It's very easy to change these metrics So let's say if you said at 70 the the air force is running out of targets
They're saying hey, we we got like more up missions to run over Gaza today But we don't have any more targets So they drop it down to Sidstein they had another 10,000 names to list right this is this is what was going on in Gaza So now This has been It's not a kill list, but it is a very similar AI program Call to lead developed by Palantir and it's being used by immigration enforcement in the United States And basically what they do is they get a map of a neighborhood And it assigns each person that neighborhood a score of how likely they are to be in a legal immigrant And if you score over a certain number Ice then goes nods on your door and rounds you up in the rest of you if you don't have documentation So there is Joseph Katz at 404 media who wrote this story last week And he was interviewed on a news say man I thought you have some really interesting insight. So I want to play this clip for you guys
I'm hearing about this thing called elite I didn't know what it was at the time and we didn't really know What tech ice was using to actually find people But eventually I got leaked this user guide which explained the tool in detail I found this testimony from Oregon where an ice official, you know, under swan swan deposition Explained exactly how they were using this tool to actually target neighborhoods And I also found this link to Palantir as well I think finally providing the clearest link yet between the tech the Palantir is making And how ice is actually choosing where to raid and where to target And ice official said it's basically like a Google's map into face where you can look around the united states You can zoom in on targets And I've seen the interface and he's exactly right there's exactly what it looks like You then click on an individual person and it brings up their name a photo Most importantly for ice there are apparent address and also a confidence score on how likely it is that person is actually there
Such as 90 out of 100 or 75 out of 100 It allows them to really zoom in on who they want to go pick up that day So you write about the app user guide what did the user guide reveal to you It really showed in granular detail what exactly ice is able to do such as if they want to target this neighborhood There may be a drawer circle around it and that will bring up information on all of the people there If they want to figure out where a certain population might be they can use it for that And of course, I think really importantly for what is happening in Minnesota at the moment The tool can be used to sort of write up special operations is what ice calls it and that can send target lists out to people on the ground And then they can then pursue them as well as part of these much wider operations that was sitting across the united states So this is absolutely terrifying and this is coming from a person who I wouldn't call myself an immigration hawk But certainly after four years of Joe Biden I really did see a need for America to secure its own border
Understand who was coming into the united states and probably Pretty drastically reduce the number of people coming into this country In an overall sense However whenever you support a government policy You always had to be very aware that there are really serious potential ramifications And one of my biggest concerns in always in supporting any kind of immigration restrictive immigration policy Is that there are millions of people living in the united states illegally And if you really did have any serious intention of addressing that problem You would need tens of thousands of police to constantly be going around and harassing people right like asking for their identification and It Part of what's great about the united states of America is that the freedom that we all have in this country Not to be walking down the street and have to you know have our papers on us our risking thrown in jail or you know
Just have a copy and able to stop you and ask you for your papers, but A mass deportation policy requires that and of course what trump is being cartoonishly worse than it would even have to be Rather than having any kind of trained police officers and any kind of Reckon recognizable police officer uniforms right like these people are going around And resting you know women mothers and and they have Rifles on them right they're not just like cops with the sidearm that doesn't get pulled out no They have their rifles strapped around them at all times with with all these civilian encounters You could tell that most of these ice people are Are all the people who 20 years ago when they got a high school our college were too stupid to pass the police exam And so now that the government is super desperate for law enforcement They finally have in Some kind of role where they could have authority over other people's lives
And they've spent the toy past 20 years Famicizing what they would done as a cop and now that they're being put on the street They're given this authority. They're given a big rifle. They're allowed to wear a mask They feel essentially wallless right like nothing to restrict them the president has their back You could gun down a woman in the street in her car and absolutely get away with it Right and so they're acting exactly as you had spent they would absolute in a hundred percent thugged tree All over the united states of america we we cannot allow this to happen even if You are pro The porting more illegal people out the united states of america you have to understand What trump is going to do to execute that is going to destroy the united states of america Probably and i don't think a lot of people understand this How much Information our government has on each and every one of us now you would think for the government to have the information
That's on your cell phone. They would need a warrant But they don't they just need the american tats fares checkbook because what they do is they write chats to google And facebook and all these other bait tag companies and they sell your data to the government Right data that they would actually need a warrant that they would have to go to the judge And get a warrant with your name and you know a date and what is to be seized they they would have to do this right But instead they're just buying it You know it would be completely illegal if you know you had let you lived in an apartment And The cops want to come in and search your apartment They go to a judge and judge denies them the warrant They can't then go to your landlord and pay your landlord $500 to let you into that apartment That's a bribe that's illegal and the evidence will be inadmissible But here you have them using all this data that they collect on us
Now they're plugging it into these ai ai algorithms and again They look a hell of a lot like the ones that israel was using in gaza And they're using it to surveil to monitor And if i guess you know any of us are ever considered undesirables As all these illegals in the united states are now could be used to round us up and throw us in jail art spells from the country This is this is absolutely terrifying We should all be highly concerned and highly active on these two particular issues One government using ai to identify potential People either for deportation our crimes our things like that and two Government particularly intelligence agencies buying our government buying our information that they would otherwise Nea warrant for With our tats dollars right there. They're using our own tats dollars To bribe and to buy our information from the our tech overlords and to surveil and monitor
Deras. This is this is absolutely unacceptable unconstitutional and un-American All right, everybody that will do for the show a day. Thank you. Also much for listening Please subscribe to the show. We are a growing channel But they only grow with your with your support right if you guys aren't out there recommending liking sharing our stuff Then it's not going to grow in spread so do me a favor go out there like and subscribe to this show and we'll be back with another episode tomorrow You
More episodes
More from Kyle Anzalone Show

[Guest] Prof. Glenn Diesen : Trump's Legacy: The Catastrophic Destruction of t...
Kyle Anzalone Show

US TROOPS ON THE MOVE: IS TRUMP RESTARTING THE WAR?!
Kyle Anzalone Show

[GUEST] LtCOL Karen Kwiatkowski: Trump Orders Hormuz Blockade After Talks Fail—C...
Kyle Anzalone Show

[GUEST] Larry Johnson: Are Russia, China and Iran the Big Winners of Trump and N...
Kyle Anzalone Show