
About this episode
NCR is back after an unforeseen delay (our apologies), and we start by catching up with the conclusion of the Maria Sharapova meldonium case, as Ben welcomes back guest Richard Ings, who had previously discussed Sharapova's positive test with us back on Episode 145A when she announced it back in March. What have we learned over the course of this case? How much should this affect Sharapova's reputation, and should she be labeled a "cheater"? What can ITF do to prevent its athletes having similar pitfalls in the future? All that, plus transparency, TUEs, and more.
Reading material referenced in this episode:
- The initial ITF decision against Sharapova
- The CAS decision overturning the ITF decision and reducing ban from 24 to 15 months.
- Ben's interview with Sharapova in the New York Times
- ESPN's Outside the Lines report critical of tennis anti-doping systems.
Get every episode summarized
Each time No Challenges Remaining publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from No Challenges Remaining

U.S. Open Quarterfinals: On Great Matches and Long, Long Nights
No Challenges Remaining
Sep 10, 20261:18:14failed

U.S. Open Fourth Round Into Quarterfinals: Bob, Five Years, and Taiwan
No Challenges Remaining
Sep 8, 202636:39failed

U.S. Open: The View From Midway Through
No Challenges Remaining
Sep 7, 202656:27failed

U.S. Open Rd 2: Under the Influencers
No Challenges Remaining
Sep 4, 202656:07failed