
About this episode
The ‘Broadview Six’ case was one of the Trump administration’s prominent prosecutions of anti-ICE protesters. Federal prosecutors in Chicago brought felony charges to fanfare, then curiously dropped them, keeping only misdemeanor counts. Now we know why: they engaged in egregious misconduct to obtain the felony indictments, which they then sought to conceal from the judge, who is not amused.
For all subscribers, we discuss that and US Attorney Andrew Boutros, who issued a weird memo promising reform, and the news that his office is apparently running a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, examining whether she lied in a deposition hundreds of miles from Chicago.
For paying subscribers (upgrade your subscription now at serioustrouble.show) this week, there’s also:
* Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s big and unusual win on vindictive prosecution, which is already inspiring the Southern Poverty Law Center.
* A sordid case involving an Eleventh Circuit judge whose sofa cushion required forensic testing after clerks asserted she was noisily carrying on an affair in chambers.
* A free speech win for West Point faculty.
* An interesting new insider trading case involving Polymarket.
* A probably-too-clever motion attacking the “anti-weaponization fund,” and
Get every episode summarized
Each time Serious Trouble publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Serious Trouble

If You Can’t Trust Michael Cohen, Who Can You Trust?
Serious Trouble

The Happiest Place on Earth (a Courtroom)
Serious Trouble

Because I Got Highly Likely to Lose an Anti-SLAPP Motion
Serious Trouble

Who's to Judge Jeanine?
Serious Trouble