
Barrister's Misconduct: Lying About Inheritance
About this episode
A barrister in New South Wales was found guilty of professional misconduct for lying about his inheritance in a family law dispute. He initially claimed to have received only $70,000 from his late mothers estate, but later admitted to receiving $230,000. The tribunal criticized him for his evasive answers, lack of candor, and failure to provide financial records. He also breached an undertaking by taking out a mortgage without disclosure. Disciplinary orders are pending, which could significantly impact his legal practice.
Support the show:
Get a discount at https://solipillow.com/discount/dnn.
Advertise on DNN:
[email protected]
This is an automated, high-level news summary based on public reporting.
Report issues to [email protected].
View sources & latest updates:
https://sources.thednn.ai/211dd02ab5a65f87
Interactive timestamps
Jump to segmentGet every episode summarized
Each time Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
Hosts & guests
Transcript ready
22 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.
Full transcript
Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now! — Barrister's Misconduct: Lying About Inheritance. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.
0:00It's March 22nd. This is Sydney News Today, your AI-powered local news. A barrister in New South Wales has been ruled guilty of professional misconduct after lying about his inheritance in a family law dispute with his ex-partner. The New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal found that in a 2017 affidavit, he claimed to have received only $70,000 dollars from his late mother's estate back in 2012. In reality, he got nearly $230,000 dollars. The issue came to light in 2020 when his ex-partner's lawyers spotted inconsistencies in the state documents. He then filed a corrected affidavit, admitting the true amount, but the Tribunal noted he could not explain why he understated it initially and failed. To check any records, Tribunal members described him as an evasive and unimpressive witness, who often dodged questions or claimed not to recall details. They stressed this was not a one-time slip, but a prolonged failure over three years, showing
1:00a lack of candor expected from a seasoned lawyer. He also deliberately ignored a court order to hand over financial records about how he spent the inheritance and breached an undertaking by taking out. A mortgage on the family home for over $330,000 dollars without disclosure. This was for personal debts, not court-approved needs. Disciplinary orders are still to come from the Tribunal, which could severely impact his ability to practice law, though the findings are on the civil, standard, and not criminal. His identity remains protected by court orders.
More episodes
More from Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Ben Roberts-Smith's Overseas Moves Unveiled
Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

NDIS Cuts vs Gas Tax: A Fair Budget Debate
Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

Sandilands & Henderson's Radio Battle: Legal Fight Heats Up
Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!

David Malouf: Bridging Worlds with Words
Sydney News Today | 2 Min News | The Daily News Now!