#154 Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science - Footwear Comparison Evidence
About this episode
Josh Dubin speaks with Bill Osinski, journalist and author of “Guilty By Popular Demand.”
Even when done correctly, impression analysis of evidence, like shoe prints and tire tracks, is purely subjective. Many experts recognize its limitations. But one so-called “expert” in particular pushed the limits of this forensic discipline to produce horrific outcomes.
Learn more and get involved.
https://www.wrongfulconvictionpodcast.com/junk-science
Wrongful Conviction: Junk Science is a production of Lava for Good™ Podcasts in association with Signal Co. No1.
We have worked hard to ensure that all facts reported in this show are accurate. The views and opinions expressed by the individuals featured in this show are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of Lava for Good.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Get every episode summarized
Each time Wrongful Conviction publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.
Email me new episodesFree for 3 shows. No card needed.
No transcript yet
This episode has not been transcribed. Request it and it moves to the front of the queue.
More episodes
More from Wrongful Conviction
#589 Jason Flom with Tyrone Noling
Wrongful Conviction
#588 In Memory of Jason Strong | Jason Flom with Jason Strong
Wrongful Conviction
#587 Maggie Freleng with Deborah Nicholls
Wrongful Conviction
#586 Jason Flom with Ronnie Miller
Wrongful Conviction