Skip to content
TrackPodcasts
educationSep 3, 202647:07

09-03-26 Part 2

About this episode

No show notes were published with this episode.

Get every episode summarized

Each time Ethan Brings You the World publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Hosts & guests

Transcript ready

1,017 searchable segments. Every word is indexed and playable.

09-03-26 Part 2

Ethan Brings You the World

0:00
47:07

Full transcript

Ethan Brings You the World09-03-26 Part 2. Machine-transcribed; use the interactive transcript above to jump the player to any line.

Richard Barris, be sure and stay with us for that. And what's coming up in the midterms and so much more and how popular the war is, how popular that is, is gonna be very revealing tomorrow's news today. But let me just finish up here. Ladies and gentlemen, when you go to Freedom Rx, you have to understand that it's about preserving health and upholding values, your health, your business, nobody else's, your health, your business, nobody else's, freedom Rx, preserving health, upholding values. The folks that own this are patriots. They first came to me four years ago, one to do this, I agreed three, they had it built about a year ago, they kept adding to it, but going through all the stuff we went through, I wanted to wait till we had a new operation to launch it with this incredible sponsor. Go now to freedomrxhealth.com, preserving health, upholding values, your health, your business, nobody else's, the very best quality, the total selection of everything, the best telemedicine, so easy,

the balls in your court, go now to freedomrxhealth.com. All right, I wanna play a few minutes of coming up more, the boss of Gloria Steinemann others, Paul Erlich, she died at 92, he's still crawling around, I think. This is the granddaddy of the depopulation, this is their high priest. Just to understand, we get into her later in the CIA, this is very important information, here's a few minutes of it. Sometime in the next 15 years, the end will come and by the end, I mean an utter breakdown of the capacity of the planet that supports humanity. Perdot, would you welcome Dr. Paul Erlich? I have to get the death rate and birth rate in balance, and there's only two ways to do it. One is to bring the birth rate down, the other is to push the death rate up. Now, given the population explosion, let alone in this country, what can the government, what ought the government to do about this? Well, what it ought to do is this, the first thing you don't want to put, I'm against government interference in our lives, you want to minimize that. So the very first thing the government should do is try and take the pressure off to reproduce.

There's a lot of pressure in our society now to reproduce. If you're single, people try and push you into getting married. You know, your wife, you have a bachelor over and your wife says, you shouldn't have a nice girl over the idea as nobody should escape, so there's pressure to get married. Young couples, if they don't have children, people say, gee, they must be sterile. They never say, gee, maybe they like the selfish being miserable. You like as having kids as smoking, the sky wants to kill you. You have children. So the first thing that should happen is that the president ought to say, from now here on out, no intelligent patriotic American family ought to have more than two children, preferably one, if you're starting a family now. Not any law, but just say, this is what responsible people do. You ought to make the FCC see to it that large families are always treated in a negative light on television wherever they appear. There ought to be a tremendous amount of television time devoted to spot commercials. That's what we've had against smoking. But the ones in the middle say, in the middle of Beverly Hillbilly's, you get a scene which shows Los Angeles in the smog and it just says, this city has a fatal disease. It's called overpopulation and so long.

Now, that sort of campaign, you could have a sense, a sample census, which would see whether that was having a desired effect. If that didn't, you could move to giving women bonuses for not having babies. That almost certainly would do the job. If that didn't have the effect, then you could move to changing the tax structure so that people who had the money and had the children paid for the children. In other words, you would increase taxes on people with children rather than decrease them since they have the children that require more services. If that doesn't work, then you'll have the government legislating the size of the family and people say, oh, that's impossible. Government can never intrude and tell you how many children to have. Well, I got news. It intruded a long time ago and told you how many wives you can have and there's not the slightest question that if we don't get the population under control with voluntary means that in the not too distant future, the government will simply tell you how many children you can have and throw you in jail if you have too many. And that's China. The form that organization called zero population growth and then Johnny took me on the tonight show with you welcome Dr. Paul Ehrlich. All right, let's stop there. There's a lot more of this. Why you been talking about Lorde Steinem? Why not go and I'll show where he was her boss at the CIA up against poor odds in the midterms

from the betting offices to the pollsters, you name it. Biden Judge, blocks president Trump's executive order ending birth, terrorism. There's so much more happening on that front. And so to look at that, to also look at the public's increasing vast majority four out of five and a whole bunch of polls are totally against all these wars and they get all the bizarre arrogance statements out of Trump about I'm not worried about the average person in the economy. I only worry about war. Could the Democrats write a better script for him to lose the midterms? So there's a huge obvious geopolitical realignment happening. We are in the fourth turning in the cycle. And the big question is, what do we expect in the future? And how can we affect the outcomes of things now? Because when you study history and you study the think tanks that look at trends and developments,

they always talk about in these fourth turnings, the fourth part and the fourth part in a cycle, the 80 something year cycle, things are pretty much status quo and frozen to a great extent, until the fourth turning and then going into the first part of the new cycle. They call that a liquefocation process where it's hard to stone. Now it's malleable like clay. You add 10 billion people, robotics, AI, that all accelerates cycles now. Now the globalists have talked about the end of history. Obama and others wanted a planetary technology to kind of end the cycles, but then submit their control but not have the process of rebirth and then ascension and then corruption and then collapse and rebirth. But their plan isn't going well for their great reset. But you still have the chaos generated out of this and then you have the boomers on average not signaling them out. But still just want to kind of sail into the sunset and don't want to hear any problems. They have become just as cult like as Democrats have been.

I see a lot of misrepresentations in the media, see them every day, I saw without looking, I saw a bunch of examples today and trending on YouTube and X. Oh, Jones wants to join the Democrats. We won't have him. He admits he was wrong all these years now that we were right. Well, you're in the back seat, we're in the front seat. No, Trump was a revolutionary. He did do a lot of things. The system did come after him. A bunch of good did happen, but we're in a cycle. We're, we're in a time of great change. Trump is just somebody that wrote it on a wave of that. So if I support, say a restaurant, I've been going to for many years as good food, good prices, good, you know, and then now that's new owners, and I get food poisoning once. I probably don't go back, get food poisoning twice. I don't go back. So let Trump's like a restaurant I used to go to. And now I got in a second couple of times, I'm saying, hey, I wouldn't go there. You get sick. It doesn't mean I support the other restaurant down the street that, you know, that they deal drugs out of. That's the Democrats. So there are part of the old collapsing order, even more intense, at least Republicans, at least acted like they were part of the forth turning, part of the new renaissance,

revolutionaries, part of the change, as long as they were the underdogs, and really, really speaking like that, they were gonna win. But Trump began to go anti-underdog pro-establishment, very transparently. He was always a mix of that in the last year and a half. And then he does all of the nomenclature and all the PR of a arrogant plutocrat of an oligarch. So it's the worst possible scenario. Doesn't Trump at the populist things he does? Instead runs everything in the ground with renaming bodies of water and empiriously stomping around. I'm ranching here. I appreciate Richard Barris, the people's pundit, the director of big data, and author of the best-selling book, Burn It Down, but the pulsing in Americans really want at people's underscore pundit. Nizo introduction, great to have him here to give us a data dump on this and other big trends we're facing. Richard, thanks for coming on on short notice. But I thought of you when I saw all these new numbers coming out, that just confirmed, looks like it's getting worse by the minute and it is an amplification effect.

Thanks for having me back, Alex. It's good to be here. And yeah, I mean, this is the situation. I wish we could rewind the clock six months to when a few of us were arguing that this could be the grim ugly picture that we're looking forward to going into Labor Day, coming ahead of Labor Day. And now we're here, you know, so at least, you know, the people are starting to come around to see it. I just, the problem with the Republican consultant class, Alex, is that they're still living in a world where they're waiting for that Labor Day turn. And it's not to say it can't happen. But that is the old way of thinking about elections. And in this modern era, the era of information, people start to tell themselves, an election narratives and stories, months and months and months in advance. And I said this yesterday, I'm going to repeat it again now. It's the reason why the switcheroofer Democrats didn't work, Alex, because it didn't matter. By that time, voters had already told themselves a narrative, which was that the country was lied to about Joe Biden, his state of mind, his health, his policies. They were told they were going to bring the adults back in the room.

The boat was going to stop rocking. They could have switched out Joe Biden with anyone. And they still would have lost, because voters look back and they said, we wanted Trump back. The problem Republicans are having now, is that no matter what they say, they can't really erase the last year and a half. They have to do something. Talking to your blue in the face is not going to be good enough. They need to post some very first of all, they need to end the war. It's grossly unpopular and going into a war in a midterm cycle that is unpopular has resulted in a defeat 100% of the time in the modern era. So I mean, they're really going up against an enormous historical headwind here. So people, they know what to do. This is the thing. I mean, they know what to do. So this is a choice at this point, Alex, you know, then can go to the microphone all he wants. This is a choice. And just unpacking that, because everything you say is so dead on, you talk for an hour on each little statement you make. We have the Trump apologists running around with huge amounts of foreign money, Israeli money and even Pentagon money beating everyone over the head,

calling classic OGMaga scum and traders. And I don't care about that from my own personal self, just Trump's wildly unpopular. I'm glad he's differentiated. That's a favor, thank you. But that's for me, for his constituents, totally demoralizing them and freaking them out. And we're seeing a mass exodus out of Maga. And instead of them, you know, trying to put the brakes on and in trying to at least put out populace rhetoric, we're not getting that. And so this looks like it is going to be a real disaster. But the only other good news is the only other group more unpopular than what Trump's done to himself is the Democrats. Their numbers continue to sink as well, because it's all an anti-establishment for a turning situation. So to me, that's the only silver lining that feeds into this, where they might keep the Senate, except they didn't mitigate the election fraud, not that Trump didn't try to unlock it. So I think right now this is, this is, I don't think anybody knows what's going to happen, but it doesn't look good. What do you think? Yeah, we're going to have a new poll coming out soon, but it doesn't look good. And the last time I was on your show, we took a look at a lot of graphics from our polling

and it was trends, directionally what we have been seeing since the beginning of the Trump administration. First three to five months were great. When he won the election, Republican was a record number of people in the country who said, yes, I'm a Republican. And of that, about half of them said they were America first, they were MAGA. The thing is they were young, they were non-white. The only group that said they were still traditional Republicans within that group was 65+. That group, that cultist group that you just described, that's the only group that still calls themselves MAGA. It's been completely reversed. 65 and over now calls themselves MAGA and everyone below now does not. So that is directly where this thing is headed. One of the charts we showed, that's up there. That's a great example of this. The other one was partisan affiliation and we told you that that record, wherever Republicans went in in November of 2024, has completely collapsed. And now we are seeing Democrats with a huge advantage on partisan affiliation. That is typically a leading indicator of what you'll see later with registrations, although

we are already starting to see that. And wouldn't you know it this week, the Gallup Party affiliation trend came out and it was a disaster. It's the largest advantage that Democrats have held since Barack Obama won in 2008. Just to give people an idea too, there's a lot of coping going on with that Gallup trend. They may have been, they may have had some misses in recent years with elections, but that trend has directly been accurate every year that we have showed it to people. If in 2024, we tried to tell Democrats, look, not only are you going to lose, but Trump's going to win the popular vote. This is what Gallup is showing. They were right. It's always maybe a point here, two points there. It's not a huge error, but directionally they have been right. And the party that goes into it with an advantage like that ends up winning the national popular vote. It's held true directionally for both presidential cycles and midterm cycles. So we were ahead of the curve on that one. And no matter how much you beat the death Sal, try to get people to pay attention. It really just ends up you've been beaten a dead horse for six months.

But I don't think people will know how bad it can possibly be until we go into until it's Wednesday morning. And I got to say all these conversations about polling misses, nobody's having a conversation about how potentially pollsters could have over corrected for understating Democrats again in 24. So a lot of these polls that are making some of these races look closer than they probably are. At least as likely to have course have over corrected their methodology and are now potentially overestating Republicans in 25. That's all that happened. Remember Virginia, remember New Jersey, all these special and all cycles. Republicans were overestated and Democrats went on to win sometimes twofold or more. New Jersey, it wasn't close, was it, right? Virginia, it was not close. So I'm concerned that we're heading for a similar situation. Now you said something earlier that was really important. I saw complaints by different political analysts that they've held back the majority of the money until after Monday's holiday.

And then I made some calls to White House people and to Roger Stone, you know, who's run some campaigns. And he said, well, that's their plan. They're doing the standard deal to spend it after Monday's holiday. But as you said, these narratives now need to come before and he needs to counter previous narratives that he did to himself with all this elitist talk about I don't care about Medicare Medicaid, I only care about war, I don't care about any Americans, economic problems. I mean, these quotes are literal, you know, just begging to be destroyed and then not responding to the inflation. And you've not seen, we feel your pain saying affordability crisis isn't real. I mean, all of this is the perfect way to enrage people. And I have trouble believing Trump is that stupid to do the opposite of a hole in one. I mean, these are perfect statements he's making, but from a Sepikoo political suicide angle. Sometimes it just sounds like he's frustrated to me and, you know, the data center truth

post. You know, I read it and I thought, now, you know, as a matter of policy, I can understand what he's trying to say. But everybody knows they're politically toxic. It's not like he doesn't know that. So if you have a case to make, make the case, you get super simple to do, by the way, with data centers, if you need them to keep up with China, you equate it to the nuclear era. I remember when I'm holding of them, showing my age, but I remember when we had a similar debate over nuclear power and then we got behind as a country and we had to pick up the pace. Do you remember that Alex? Is it a people protested? You know, well, that's the, that's the argument Trump can and needs to make if they are, in fact, that vital, but ignoring the political reality, and this is a textbook example, the messaging from the White House, it's just bad. Ignoring that political reality, it just doesn't make any sense. Here's an example, a middle size town or city mayor would have the political scale. And I'm going to let's just say Trump said, you know, a solace politician, which I'm not even saying, they would say, well, we need the jobs, but I understand local concerns.

Let me create a commission to look at this and let's have, let's have some people up from Washington. Then he's sit there with mayors that were against it, ones that were for it and act like he's looking on both sides to make both groups happy. Instead, he just says, you're poor and stupid and backwards screw you. You know, sir, you worried about the incredible economic, you know, hardship of the average American. I don't care about any Americans hardship. This is a quote worth for word, basically, I mean, play the clip. All I care about is the war and you can, and he goes, cause the nuclear weapons, but he has to know they're going to clip that out. I still go back to that because it is the most insane level blow your feet off with shotgun behavior, I've ever seen. And in the meantime, while they're waiting for Labor Day, Roy Cooper is bludgeoning Michael Watley over the head all summer long with these clips, Alex. And I have seen some Watley ads. This is a great example. And what is he talking about? Cooper's record on crime. I hate to, you know, who is polling for these people? No, crime is like number four on the most important issues.

It's about cost of living and all summer long, all Cooper did was bludgeon Watley over the head with cost of living. All summer long, all Shard Brown did was bludgeoned. John used it over the head with cost of living. It is going to be incredibly difficult at this point to say, and one of them is a good ad. It is. It's about a father who lost his daughter to a bad policy from Roy Cooper, but that is not going to overtake the number one most important issue. It's just not the same thing. You see spain being overrun. You'll be like that if you want for me. For people that don't know, not everybody's been hit by crime. That's why it's the number fourth fifth issue. But when it comes to affordability, not be able to pay your bills, going bankrupt, and that's the, let's go through what are the top issues for people? The top it, far and away, cost of living inflation is number one. And every week we rank them. We do a rank distribution, which means folks, we just don't ask them to choose the number one. But then we say, rank them from one to whatever it may be, and we usually do 12 or 14.

Tell us which one comes in first in your mind, which one? Second, third, and that gives us some much better understand, deeper, wider, more granular understanding of where people's minds are at. Number one is cost of living and inflation, and it's not even close. A distant number two is generally the economy and jobs, the mobility between jobs. Number three is healthcare, Alex, which is a disaster. Any poll that we've ever conducted over the more decade, we've been, I've been in public polling. Any time healthcare has been in the top three, it ended up a very bad election for Republicans. These, one exception to that, which is 2010, but they had commanded that issue because of the Obamacare debate. Number four is crime. That's it. It's number four. And number five is immigration and border security. And after that, actually, is corruption and accountability. And then the problem policy is number seven, just to give everybody an idea. Foreign policy, national security, which is dominated, not just the White House, but Republican talking points. You got a senator like Ted Cruz. He's got poor Ken Paxton fighting the battle of his life to not lose the most important

Senate seat on that map. And every day Ted Cruz is on Twitter, attacking Tucker Carlson and talking about Israel. What do you think that does to the average Texan voter? If they're a swing voter or not, even somebody who may have been part of Trump's coalition. What do you think that does to them when they're weighing their options on who to vote for in November, whether it's Tallerico who's talking about cost of living or it's Ken Paxton who has, who would be a junior senator to this guy? Well, it's exactly, he's not even helping out. That's about to be under him. Cruz, you're right, a member of president. You think he'd want the Texas senator to your senator on the side, but let's quantify that. You have the Israel lobby and the Neocons calling anyone that doesn't support nuclear war basically and total war and as a as a guitar or Iranian agent beating everybody over the head. And it's like the sixth, you know, fifth or sixth most important issue. And but then it is a betrayal to Republican voters, because they know he said he wouldn't have these new big wars. So, so that's just a trust issue. And then people wonder why everyone's sick of hearing about Israel all day, then they

call it anti-Semitic. No, we just want to hear about our jobs. We just want to hear about our security. We want to hear about our future and then we get beat up with the head that we don't want to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on new wars and in danger of the whole planet, we get called anti-Semitic and people just get enraged by that. It is literally Marie Antoinette, let them eat cake type stuff. Alex, you're calling 70% plus of the country anti-Semitic, you're calling them guitarries, you're calling whatever whatever the word to sure is. They they're in a tiny minority. Brow beating only works if you're either a plurality, a strong plurality or you're in a majority and you can brow beat a smaller group. You can't brow beat the larger majority, which isn't even a slight majority. We're talking about a huge majority who just want the war to end and the president knows that. He gets it. He tweeted our poll. He gets it. He understands it. I forgot I should have started the interview with Trump, because I guess your poll the way it was written when I saw it was about, oh look, the Republican party, which is,

obviously even more disconnected than Trump, they are causing a disaster and Trump agreed. That's a big deal. Let's talk about why Trump reposted your poll on social. Yeah, I mean, this is, this was those neocons were hurtful to the peace process. Every time they got close to an MOU, they would jump out with their coordinated attacks and campaigns and try to pressure the administration to back off or try to kill the deal, try to make it just in the environment to negotiate in, basically impossible to get something done. And this is, that ended up happening. The president posted it out to say, look, this is popular, this MOU is popular. And by the way, it was more popular with Trump voters than it was with Democrats. And I told you that the last time we were on, they, Democrats were telling us during the poll that they opposed the peace deal now because they didn't think it was good for the country. But because they wanted the war to continue so they could have a better chance of winning the midterms. I mean, Harris voters were literally telling us they hope it continues.

Because it would hurt Republicans. And Trump posted it because he knows that obviously the American public is just really no appetite for this yet. It didn't stop. And we all know who the usual suspects are, the, the same people. I won't even give them any clout, you know, having their names come out of my mouth. But they actually made it difficult on the negotiation team. So I mean, well, we're trying to win the midterms and save the country. And when we got to go to break, let's come right back into this. Hitler was a terrible guy. And obviously he did oppress people. He was smart enough though to pick a little minority demonize them and go after him to unify a system. Yeah. So he picked a grip was like 5% of the population or something. Exactly when Hillary, a lot of pollsters agree one of the big shifts on her was when she called everybody to pourables. As you pointed out last time we were on a few weeks ago, Trump had the ultimate in modern history. I'm from behind underdog victory. We saw the whole system after him, even in the established repulsed, he was at 57, 58% and then we watched all the missteps go down, down, down, down, down. Then all the never Trump or swing into action, open Israeli money.

Billions being spent domestically. You know, it admits eight front war to suppress us. That completely backfires. And then what is the Israeli lobby and the war lobby going to do? It's not just them. The defense contractor is going to do when we lose the House and Senate probably House I think we're sure. And then the Democrats go on an incredible jihad. I mean, probably literally not just politically. And we'll obviously get the blame for them losing though we're in consequential. I just don't know what 60 days left. If it's possible to reverse this, maybe if Trump made every right move, maybe maybe mention the president, what would those moves be? I think at this point, so much trust has been lost. I don't think the genie can be put back in the bottle because even when Trump does good things and I'm just trying to call balls and strikes, my listeners and I've been on here 30 something years and I don't just follow the listeners want, but I listen to them because I respect them. They get enraged at me and just say, we're done. Burn it all down. I'm not just quote in your book. Most people I know, including people below age of 15, even some older, they're just

done and want to go ahead and just have a revolution. I don't think they know what that's like quite yet. I rather have a cultural revolution of liberty versus globalism and that usually revolutionists don't turn out well, but that is the sentiment I'm getting. Go ahead, sir. Yeah, I mean, I've tried at this point. They would have I've tried to give advice on what to do. I mean, the closer we get to the election, Alex, the boulder, the moves need to be. I mean, how bold, guys, I mean, at this point, historically speaking, just from talking to people that we interview for polling, it would have to be very bit. First of all, the war has to end. Second of all, you'd have to do big things like remove, protect protections for vaccine injuries for the manufacturers. You'd have to do big, big things that people have been striving for, you know, accountability. People want real revolution. They want, they want real revolution. If they arrested Bill Gates, if they arrested Bill Gates and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, they went on landslide. Yeah, I mean, this is the kind, this is the kind of stuff I'm talking about. I mean, big, big things, the wow moments going out there and releasing a plan on affordability

for housing or healthcare or something like that. Any time you try to pull something like that at this point, the very first reaction is what have you been doing for a year and a half? You had all this time to do it. Even the stuff over the save act, you know, that time has come in past. It can trend on Twitter every day until November and Republicans can pound their fists on the table. All they want, it's not happening. John Thune's not passing anything. Was one of his biggest mistakes right out of the gate was backing John Thune. He should have went with Rick Scott, who's not perfect, but at least Rick Scott had a better idea about what put together the 24 coalition and what it would have taken to hold it together. And I'm not saying that he's not, you know, a part of the foreign policy lobby. He is not as bad as thin. Why does Trump almost always, why does he almost always bet on the worst establishment person? I think it comes down to, and this is what I was going to say before we went to the break, you know, all the critics and the panicans in, to me, I think it's clear now, but even six, eight, 12 months ago, I think they were the ones who were really trying to protect

the president. I don't think that there are people, many of them who really think about the president's well-being and what it's going to look like if Democrats take both houses. And by the way, if they were to God forbid, which is a realistic possibility to feed Ken Paxson in Texas. I mean, that's the headline that you're showing right there from Thune when we started the first segment. Thune is out there saying we could really lose this. This is, we could lose the whole thing. We could lose the Senate. Now, they're begging Donald Trump to come in with their money because they wasted $100 million to protect John Cornyn against Ken Paxson. Had Donald Trump endorsed Ken earlier on in the process, those donors would have been scared out of that primary and they would not have even have spent that $100 million. Now, they're being petty and they're being vindictive. They're spending the money in Michigan, which is a long shot because why? Like Rogers is a warmonger, he's in their club. Ken Paxson is not. You just hit the key. If you look at the races, and I've talked to a lot of experts where the money's been spent, is that it's going to the Zionists, it's going to the Neocons. So they are, they are spending it, and just like spending way more than they'd spend in

10 or 15 other congressional districts to get good Republicans elected, they spent so much money that donors aren't going to give now to other people taking out massie. So these vinge curves is going to lose this whole thing. And what taking out massie was another issue. I understand people have their problems with Thomas Massey, but this is a game about addition, not subtraction. You don't start cutting arms off of your coalition and legs off of your coalition when you won by 1.5%. You did not win by eight or ten points like Barack Obama in 08. You didn't have the luxury of casting off lepers every time they didn't agree with you. This is a game of addition, not subtraction. And let me just issue this warning, I don't know, I'm sorry, but let me just issue this warning. I'm glad to see the president echo that warning that I've been making for days now. You cannot lose Ken Paxson in Texas. You cannot lose that seat in Texas. I've seen them do this, the donor class and the consultant class. They did this in 2020. They were petty. They were vindictive with David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler. And it went on to lose both of those seats and the runoffs that have not been able to

reclaim a single one in Georgia. Only Donald Trump was able to win that statewide at the federal level. By the way, plenty of times to start over, this isn't a, you're issuing, I never heard you say this, you're issuing a warning to the Republicans in the White House. I totally agree. This is like Stalingrad in World War II. We've got to get Ken Paxson as a great guy in regardless. But this is a major optics issue against this Communist pervert, weirdo. So start over, agree, this is Max Trump needs can't Trump directly see the dump money in this issue. They're telling him to dump money. He's saying you dump money. Whoever does it, do it now. I don't really care. Again, give up on the long shots. You couldn't win Michigan in a pro Republican year. The idea you're going to win it now is ridiculous. They haven't won that seat since 1994, the Republican Revolution. And before that, Alex, you have to go back to 1972. And even when they did win it in 1994, they lost it, the very next cycle, which George W. Bush got elected in, they lost it in 2000 to a woman. We all know now is Debbie Stabenow. They haven't been able to win that seat even with Trump on the ballot.

So start over with your warning, we need maximum American taxing because if he gets shot down, what is that to do? Checkmate Alex, it's checkmate. The the morale blow to Republicans from losing Texas in 2024 would count when 26 would carry over till 2020. Democrats would be foaming at the mouth. It would be morale boost on steroids. And I've seen this play out before. A Republican sleep on a state they think is super red. And then the next cycle, it turns into a blue state. It can go in the right conditions for a Democratic candidate. And we are in a bad Republican year right now. If they lose it, they will go all in in 28 because they will see checkmate on the board. It's like sharks smell in the blood in the water, folks. If they get Ken Paxton, they will go hard the way that Biden went hard in Georgia and went hard in Arizona. This is, I feel like it's deja vu all over again. And these consultants, they don't care. For people that don't know, California used to be the red estate in the union.

Other than that. And then now look at it. We are so close, you've got all these tech billionaires pouring money in. Only Elon is fighting him some. We need Elon to come in. You know, big big big for Paxton, because you're absolutely right. The Democrats aren't spending record levels of money into and all they're doing here. The reason they know is Texas go. So goes the nation. As Eisenhower first said, this has to be maximum effort. And then there you go, Trump sitting on his hands, saying he's supporting Paxton, but not engorging him with the money. I mean, I bet if, I mean, why don't they spend the amount of money they spent in a house race in Kentucky on Paxton? Even in North Carolina, I'm in North Carolina. I don't want it to go to Roy Cooper. He was my governor. I know he's not this like conservative Democrat. They paint him out to me, but you have to make decisions and look at the big picture. Yeah. Okay. But again, there are long shots. They're throwing a lot of money at which one is more important now. It's hoping Mike Rogers defeats El Sayed because you called him a socialist or making sure

that you shore up red state. You actually have a chance in and oh, by the way, if you lose, it is checkmate. You cannot win the electoral college if you cannot keep Texas in your column. They will see it and they will go hard at it. And oh, by the way, thank Mary and Adelson for Tallerico. She's the one who bankrolled him. She made Tallerico. She's not coming in to help Ken Paxton right now. Everyone's, you know, everyone in the, probably start over. Tell them about Tallerico. For people that don't know, our little literal Adelson and her husband said, we wish weren't we're in America. We're not really Americans. We're Israelis. They say this in public. I mean, this is literally the foreign governments main paymaster doing this here domestically. I knew about this, but I haven't talked about it enough. People don't understand. She's behind this literal monster demon. There it is. She bankrolled his political career when he ran for the state legislature. She's through other groups helped in the primary. So, you know, there was this concept that maybe Jasmine Crockett would be a stronger candidate

because she just got so much turnout and juiced among the black vote and they need that in the midterm to win. Well, as it turns out, Tallerico was far more dangerous because the Hispanic population in Texas is far bigger. And Tallerico spanked her with Hispanics, including Alex. If you look at Star County, if you look at Hadoogo, if you look at Zapada, these are all areas where you could see Trump making a massive gains with Hispanics. And by the way, people at the time thought that they called, they called our polling a mirage at the time. They didn't believe it. It happened. And if you go and look at the primary and where Tallerico performed the best, he performed among those Hispanic precincts and communities where Donald Trump made the most gains. He got in some areas, it's like 80% of Kamala Harris's vote in a Democratic primary. These are small areas too. So why is that important? We know exactly how many voters are there. He could only have gotten that number of votes if he got Hispanics who just previously voted for Donald Trump to instead cross over and vote for him.

And that's why this clip is so dangerous. And you went over this quickly earlier. People don't know. The Republican party didn't set up till, you know, basically the abolitionists in the Abraham Lincoln before that it was the Wigs or two party system wanted to go away. The Democrats, the original party. And for those that don't, you know, this, you don't remember it. For the first time ever when when Trump won two years ago, he was the guy that presided over the Republicans now in all the polls being the biggest majority party, not the Democrats anymore. And now he has squandered almost all of those gains from the coalition groups that crossed over. He's lost a bunch of his original base and literally all he has is boomers, love him to death, who've got five to 10 years on this planet left. That is such a disaster. And I know that people understand that. So people need to take it very serious that Texas is on the verge of going blue. Guys, we explain this in a lot of not to shamelessly plug the book, but no, no, the book last week and Reddit. It's amazing. Burn it down. Tell us about burn it down. I mean, this is exactly what we're trying to explain to people in the book.

And by the way, you just put up the Gallup numbers before even the boomers are basically evenly split. You act as if or not you, but other people Republicans say act as if boomers are just this deeply red group. They're not. They're broken up in a two different groups. The older group is more Republican. The younger group birthed the managerial professional class in this country and they are much more democratic. If you don't win back these younger non-white coalition members that Donald Trump brought into what was to me, the most impressive coalition, any Republicans put together. You could look at Ronald Reagan and you could say, well, he won more states. Yeah, well, it was a lot wider back then. Alex, it was easier to do so. Yeah, no Trump getting, they tried to demonize him and say he was Hitler. He got the biggest votes ever, I guess, other than like Nixon of non-whites. And so you talk about squandering this. That is such a central point to understand. And now do you think Trump even understands, because all he cares about is legacy, I think, how much he's destroyed his legacy?

You know, I don't know the answer to that question. I do hope every day that he thinks deeply about it because he is, and I try not to count him out because I'm from originally that part of the country and I've watched one Trump come back after another. But I think at some point, you have to, it's September 3rd now, Alex. I mean, we've been screaming about this for a year. There's almost no way he couldn't have had a conversation about this with himself. And the people that I think, again, when you get into DC, you got to make a decision on whether you're going to confront certain people in certain forces. We were just talking about the US Senate. That was in my mind, in my mind, a big mistake. I feel like he's a little bit boxed in at this point because he didn't. He needed to do that right off the bat. So people at home understand the biggest obstacle that you have to change is not the Democratic Party. It's the Republican Rhino institutions that are entrenched in DC. The biggest defender of the deep state is the Senate Republican conference.

The biggest pushers are the Russia hoax in during Trump's first turn. We're Republican senators and Republican lawmakers. And his decision not to take them on, I feel like probably cemented this trajectory because he had, he wrote into office in our polling, which was the most accurate national poll nationwide. We actually did approval rating for when he was in office before. So it's interesting we can compare it now. He wrote into office when he won, he was positive, which is something no other president who was a prior president has been able to do. Turn an underwater approval rating into a positive one in that short period of time. And when he was riding high, even outside the honeymoon period, Alex, you were talking about like a plus 15 plus 18 approval. You could destroy anybody you want if you're a president who just won an election like that. He chose not to do it. And I think regardless of how it ends up, that's going to have an impact on his legacy because the way what he said to get this majority, what he said to put together this coalition, people believed it.

And it's what it comes down to. Republicans who are still holding on, they're white knuckleing the dream, the 5D chess stuff. I would just ask them this, did you expect people not to believe it and not to hold you accountable for it? So it always makes me surprised that people who still rapidly, that vehemently support the president are mad at voters for believing them. Exactly. Well, I'll say this in closing one final question. I'm sure you have a lot of great sources. I know you do. I have a lot of great sources, not as many as I did, but a lot. The majority of people are totally free town in the White House. The Pentagon's freaked out almost everybody's against the war. And but they say nobody listed. Trump only has a small group. He listens to it and they're so upset because they're worried about the Democrats or they should be about. But the average person boomer that still supports Trump and like you said, boomers are waking up fast. I think like 10% of their support in the lower group in age has already defected over and

is now, you know, anti Israel first. So there's a lot of good things happening there, but it's a day late in the dollar short because the Democrats are in free fall too. They may get in hand at the ball and try to democrat social stuff. But when that doesn't deliver right away, that's going to boomerang right around in 2028. If the Republicans can put somebody forward that is populist and means business. So the danger is the Democrats realize that that's why they're going to go for pure totalitarianism as soon as they get back into control because they understand it's in the forth turning and they understand that they're going to lose one way or the other. That's my view. What do you think? Yeah, I would just add to that that I and I think a lot of people on the right don't want to come to grips with this. When you're in a for turning, it's not like you have a finite amount of time to keep playing the boomerang gang. The game, the pendulum swinging game back and forth every couple of years. Democrats have to do nothing but buy their time. That's it. You had to make a move after this election and the 24 election.

You had the ball. You had to make a move with it. But explain this because when the for turning stops, it then goes into the first which solidifies whatever they choose at that moment. What happened? That's right. So whoever is left holding the ball is going to win here, folks. I mean, so Democrats just appear to understand that better than the right. And I would just ask the right is, they're the long game player. They're the long game player. They're playing the long game. Why are you know, right wing people out there ask yourselves this, look back at the last, you know, the post Obama era and look at all the election. Yeah, you want some you lost some you want a lot. Why do you keep losing? Because Democrats understand what they need to do when they have the ball and the right plays around and they make excuses and they, you know, go in a sick sick of and see mode and they make excuses and they make behind the scene deals with the Democrats for money. They sell out a lot. Let's be real Alex. Let's call it. I've never defended selling out, but you don't sell out. When you're ahead by one point in the last 30 seconds, this is the, that's a super ball.

Caroline is a great example. You have the population in and around the research triangle, Wake County, it's rising Democrat squeeze huge margins out of that. The only reason Trump was able to stem the tide of losing a state like North Carolina is because it's not quite like Northern Virginia. It's not that situation. And Trump was able to take counties in Eastern North Carolina, for instance, which is a great example, like a high county, Carter at Craven and turn them into massive margins. If you lose those massive margins, which he gets by also adding non whites, non college non whites, if you give up any of that coalition and you let any of that bleed out, then Wake County and the rest of it overtakes you. That's why Cooper's right now presently spanking Michael Watley. This is why Barack Obama was able to take North Carolina from John McCain after George Bush had a similar disaster. Well, it's the last question you got to go and I got to go, but real fast. I know you like to go off the science of the polling, but you also get future trends

very well. What happens when the Republicans lose the House and send it if they do, which things are going to happen probably? How does that, what does that do to Israel first brainwashing in the White House? Or does Trump reject them or double down in the last few years for looting and just not give a crap? I know some people right now are understating the threat and they're just starting to roll around to this now. Like what it would mean, what would the Democrats do and how difficult of a life would they make everyone's in the White House? And it's unfortunately just now starting to dawn on a lot of people. I think, well, maybe this is wishful thinking, but I do think at that point, Alex that he realizes, like, you know, you guys led me into a bad position here. You've boxed me in. And I've got these people coming from my scalp. Everyone's scalp around me. He eventually puts them on ice. Maybe that's just a hope, but I do think that's going to happen because at some point, and this is the last, and I know we're getting close, the Israel first crowd moved as fast

as they did because they know their time is up. They had to push as hard as they could right now because everyone from Tel Aviv to Washington DC knows that people like myself and Mark Mitchell were right about the trajectory when it comes to support for Israel in this country. They have overstepped. The left is reacting to it quicker than the right. But again, lightly, they've destroyed themselves PR wise. They've ruined themselves. And I mean, we talked a little bit about this last time I was on. I've read internal government reports. They know it, but their decision was to keep pushing and try to get as much as they could right now while they still had the ability to do it. Well, I don't think Donald Trump's going to react to that very well. Maybe I'm, again, maybe I'm wish casting over here, but I think Trump will come around to it. The problem is it unfortunately just be too late. Alex. I think we're hearing all this because I know it's all true. You can see it on the street, not just inside of it, pulls like yours. And it's so sad. We Trump had everything two years ago. And I've never seen such a comeback. I've never seen it squandered. It's just it's so sad. We just got to keep engaged and keep informing and keep promoting that, you know, communism

and socialism and all this is at the answer. Just because Trump went sideways, you know, doesn't mean the solution is the Bolshevik revolution 2.0. Richard Barris, thank you so much. It's a wonderful job as usual. But I can find you on X at people's underscore pun. Where else can they find all the great work you're doing and your book burn it down? Yeah. Burn it down is available on Amazon, books a million everywhere. You guys can go check it out on SNS link. That's on there. It is right there. And also on locals. I mean, the best place for the community is on locals. People's Pundit dot locals dot com. People's Pundit dot locals dot com. On your book, I'll be out soon, by the way. It's not as easy as it sounds. It's fun to do those. Thank you so much. Richard Barris, thank you. All of that, brother. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Okay. Yeah. I mean, of course, we've been proving right about the Air and War been proving right about all of it. It wasn't hard to make those predictions. Okay. I make a lot of predictions that are really hard to make. I made something that nobody else can make. Everybody knows that. I've been so pissed because I've no other place to replace one justice and security and freedom.

And I don't want to blow up the Israelis. I want to blow up the Muslims. I still want them in the country. Now everybody got manipulated to this. Israel only thought about one step ahead because the Netanyahu being all this trouble. And it is a disaster for everybody. We're going to go to break and come back with Andrew Mayor, who's upset with me. I'm going to have a long time. He's orthodox, too. And I made a video game with him. He did a great job. And doing back from when he was the don't taser me, bro. It's like 18 years ago, and whatever it was, that's coming up. I can't spend the whole hour with him because I got to get into glory as time in the CIA and Paul Arlic. But we'll spend some time with him. And I'm going to continue to get folks on from the pro-Israel side. Who I think at least mean well, they please don't have a smelly on, please. Okay, well, I'll have you on that. He's not a representative. Okay, well, don't have that right. I don't have this guy on. So we'll all have some discussion with you about that because I think it's important to open that up. Please remember, I cannot fund this operation without you. I'm not funded by the Qataris. These railways, the rises of the Chinese.

Anybody I'm funded by viewers and listeners like you at the alloshinastore.com. We have a new big sale going on right now at the alloshinastore.com. New offer. Every order gets a free bottle of CMOS gummies, not a sexy name, strongest iris CMOS out there, 93 vitamins and minerals, traits, elements, the very best organic delivered iodine. It is incredible. Get a free bottle of iris CMOS gummies right now at the alloshinastore.com with every order by a ball cap. Get a free $40 value. Any order over $99 gets a free tub of beef, tall, low highest quality. One of the healthiest best, the most delicious cooking oils there is, good in your eggs, good in your french fries. It's unbelievable. The alloshinastore.

More episodes

More from Ethan Brings You the World

View all episodes →